Even honest leftists are now coming to grips with the fact that feminism is a failure

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cybitch 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

As a woman who is planning to never start a family and never wanted to, it's just hilarious to see men online throwing that shit in women's faces, like "you will never find anyone". First of all, there are still people in my life that I love, and always will be, I don't need anyone with a dick around to have a fulfilling social/family life. Secondly, there are so many bitter older women who are bitter BECAUSE they were involved with men. Reproduction is just a natural drive people have because we're animals like any other, it's not some sort of guarantee you'll be happier and healthier, in fact statistics shows it's the other way around for a lot of women.

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

You will never feel fulfilled in life

[–]DisgustResponse 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

What a selfish and pathetic perspective.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Fine and its good that woman like you don't reproduce. You're genetic waste and its best that you're purged from the genepool. The future women will be docile ones that love to make babies, those traits will be selected for and your kind will vanish from history

[–]Aureus 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not going to claim that single life genuinely doesn't make you happy. I can't and won't persuade you one way or the other, and I'm not sure anyone's individual choices matter at this point.

But I have to point out that this attitude doesn't work. The feminists who don't work with men aren't winning the culture. That's definitionally impossible, unless you can convince men to disappear, and somehow keep the human race going after that. It's the feminists who do work with men who win the culture.

I'm not saying that feminists who work with men are necessarily good. I actually think that the current majority who do work with men are terrible, far worse than the current majority who don't work with men. Most feminists who work with men are the ones pushing hardest for trans insanity - claiming that mutilated males are women, brainwashing young men into rapid-onset-gender-dysphoria, forcing mutilated males into women's sports and locker rooms. The problem is, feminists who work with men win, and feminists who don't lose. It's a basic numbers game.

Shutting out 50% of the population and refusing to reproduce aren't even guaranteed to be losing strategies, as long as you can convert others. It worked for monasteries, after all. However, these are guaranteed to be losing strategies if the dominant ideology (woke pro-trans progressivism) is against you, additionally embraces the entire population and accepts reproduction, and converts others to boot.

Put more viscerally: trans-exclusionary feminists aren't keen on starting families, by and large. Look at who is keen on starting families (nothing crazy, just a Dove soap advertisement). There is a clear problem here.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Ignore u/Letssavethefirstworld and u/disgustresponse, I wish we weren't so toxic towards new comers.

With this subject, I agree that your mileage may vary. Where a lot of us get annoyed, is when "normalcy" is challenged. We've never had issue with uniquely talented women going into the sciences or a 1 in a million athletic talent pushing herself to greatness but why is this pushed as the default now? Why are women (and men) encouraged to completely forego child rearing and family? 25% childlessness is a lot! And not sustainable. In functional countries, the vast majority of men and women should live quiet wholesome and proper lives and of course there is room for outliers, but that's what those people are; outliers.

[–]cybitch 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Men have always been pushed to make something of themselves, not just to live quiet lives, but to be an important, respected part of society. Nowadays, women also want that for ourselves, we want to do work that is considered important to society. Even if you want a family as well, having a child takes a lot more out of a woman than it does out of a man. It doesn't help that chores are still divided in an unbalanced way. The vast majority of men still expect women to be doing everything at home as well. Even when women do agree they wish to be homemakers, the salary of one person is no longer sufficient to have the sort of lifestyle most people desire. The solution of governments everywhere seems to be to import more people from somewhere else. We'll see how it works out.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Men have always been pushed to make something of themselves, not just to live quiet lives, but to be an important, respected part of society.

You're going to get mad at me for saying this but this is a good thing for women and I'd argue is almost "feminist". Males live in hierarchies and compete with each other for dominance and this gives women something to judge her potential offspring viability. I know it sounds like social darwinism (and it is) but it's just the model that homo sapiens follow.

You need to bear in mind a few things when you mention this- mating more or less follows the Pareto principle of 80:20. 80% of women will go after 20% of men where as men are not very picky. This creates HUGE amounts of men who simply lose at life. When men crash and burn, they crash and burn hard and all of this explains why men are pushed to strive for dominance more than women. It also explains incels...

Even if you want a family as well, having a child takes a lot more out of a woman than it does out of a man. It doesn't help that chores are still divided in an unbalanced way. The vast majority of men still expect women to be doing everything at home as well.

I mean, speaking as someone who is married and has four kids, this isn't necessarily the rule. And I'm not sure where you get this idea that chores are asymmetrically divided- in my household and community, men tend to do yard work, hard labor, and building/repairing. Myself and my kids can all cook too, we love doing it and this seems to be the norm; I want to squash the boomer trope of men being helpless buffoons which I think is what you are basing this off of.

That's kind of going by the wayside now. Most young men today have stiff competition with things like social media and dating apps and have to be as able as possible. Men being fat lazy Archie Bunkers is being phased out of culture because frankly, it was pathetic from the get-go and is no longer tolerable.

Nowadays, women also want that for ourselves, we want to do work that is considered important to society.

And that's fine, but why can't homemaker be the default? My wife has a psychology degree that she uses whenever she wants to work again, but for the most part she enjoys being a homemaker. Women should have the flexibility to do either but not feel obligated to work. Where you run into problems is thus:

the salary of one person is no longer sufficient to have the sort of lifestyle most people desire.

And here we are 100% in agreement. This is fucked. And it broke society.

[–]cybitch 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And I'm not sure where you get this idea that chores are asymmetrically divided

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/us/the-household-work-men-and-women-do-and-why.html

I want to squash the boomer trope of men being helpless buffoons which I think is what you are basing this off of.

A lot of that trope is kept alive by men who pretend to suck at household chores so women won't ask them to do it again. Combine that with the complaints about "nagging" whenever women tell them to do something that's awfully difficult and unreasonable, such as suggesting they might try changing a diaper sometimes, and it's easy to see why women just accept their husbands are morons and do everything themselves. This breeds resentment and soon you'll get the stereotypical marriage where both parties hate each other.

why can't homemaker be the default?

Well, what kind of attitude did society used to have towards women, back when they were mostly homemakers? That they were important? That they had to be respected, their voices heard and their opinions taken seriously? Or was it more like "what do you say to a woman with two black eyes?" I'm sure you can finish the joke yourself. Is that what you want for your daughter, assuming your kids aren't all boys?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is that what you want for your daughter, assuming your kids aren't all boys?

No absolutely not, and I want my daughters to marry men like me who are able bodied functional adults that put the needs of their family first. I don't have any broad disagreements with anything that you have said, but I don't think the answer is to burn down the family unit and create a daycare society with two parents working. Tbh none of the tropes that you have mentioned are true of my household at all (lol I just changed a diaper). I'm all for creating a more equal household in terms of child rearing and chores- none of those complaints are unreasonable and I like to think myself and my neighbors are all a force of change in that department. I mean part of "being a man" is just getting shit done ("I have spreadsheets to fill and sports to coach, so that fucking diaper needs to be changed").

I think you just hate shitty men. My issue is that society seems to have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't think it's toxic to tell someone they won't be fulfilled without children

It literally says in the Bible that women are saved through child birth

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's definitely not true of everyone. Humans are a weird species with savant individuals that pour their efforts into strange things. Isaac Newton never had children, his efforts were in his studies. Nor did Amelia Earheart or many other individuals who devoted their life to their craft.

I do think it should be the norm though.

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're right about not everyone. For women the generalization definitely has more potency, however. Also in today's world having children is grossly out of balance.

Is what I said toxic, probably, I don't know the person so I shouldn't make such statements in absolutes

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Aversion to having children comes from self-hatred. You don't want them because you don't want more people like yourself around you. If you're still a self-hating person in adulthood then perhaps it's best not to reproduce.

[–]cybitch 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's odd, I thought it was from my hatred of snot and stepping on legos :) I also have this weird thing about not having my vagina literally tear itself in two. Maybe you can get to the bottom of what causes that too?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just wait until you get old.

Little by little, you will struggle to do the most basic things. There's not going to be around to help you and there's not going to be anyone around who cares. You will be at the complete mercy of total strangers.

[–]cybitch 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As opposed to old women now, who have so many people that help them...Oh wait, they get put in nursing homes all the same. The husbands die before they do, so that's of no help either. Just because you have an adult child doesn't mean they're going to agree to being your caregiver. I plan on taking care of my mother of course, but it's far from a guarantee for everyone, and if she, god forbids, develops something like dementia or some other very disabling condition it might be that I won't be able to look after her. So, sad as it is, this is not an issue that's unique to childless old people.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh wait, they get put in nursing homes all the same.

Because the families are selfish.

The husbands die before they do, so that's of no help either.

It's not as big of a problem if you have kids.

Just because you have an adult child doesn't mean they're going to agree to being your caregiver.

They will if you raise them right.

[–]EuropeanAwakening 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, when you are a promiscuous woman and you spent your 20s and 30s sleeping around with pick up artists and players who never had an intention of a long term relationship and just see women as a vagina, you will be abused and end up psychologically damaged and bitter towards men.

Not all women can or need to have children. There have always been women that never had children. I hope you can have happiness, though.

[–]cybitch 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know what women you're talking about that are sleeping around all over the place. The majority of women I know irl are university students and noone seems to be living that sort of lifestyle. The other group of women I have interacted with, feminists, have some older women who have families and they don't seem too happy. I agree with you though, I don't think casual sex is good for women either. We didn't evolve to compartmentalize sex the way men do. Pregnancy is a serious risk to our health even now, let alone back when there was no civilization yet. We also didn't evolve to have the same sex drives men do though, so I'm sure I can be happy with or without a man.