"If we ever want to reclaim power, we must create truth that is discontinuous with humanitarianism."

submitted by DisgustResponse from threadreaderapp.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

You're shooting yourself in the foot to spite this imaginary foreign occupation while the GOP goads you on and happily robs you blind. The Republicans have controlled every branch of government for the last 4 years, how goes your progress against these supposed invaders?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

It is not imaginary, look at who funds both parties. The Civil Rights act supersedes the first amendment and white civil rights.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

I'll be waiting for news about some kind of invasion force. Until that point, you're a useful idiot for the wealthy elite.

The Civil Rights act supersedes the first amendment and white civil rights.

Not even a little bit. Civil rights are white civil rights, and they have no overlap with the first amendment. The GOP fed you that narrative to keep you from voting in your interest and you fell for it hook, line, and sinker.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

The right of freedom of association is implied in the first amendment. This is what made segregation legal under the constitution, hence why white people voted for it. Affirmative action, racial scholarships, university quotas and government minority business loans are examples of systemic racism against whites. Also, we live in anarchical tyranny where the laws are subjectively applied based on whether the person is white or not. A civil rights lawsuit by a white person is not likely to succeed because the court system is biased against whites Even if you record your boss telling you they are hiring someone because they are black.

Laws are also subjectively enforced upon white people. If they get into a altercation with a non-white they will get hate crime charges for defending themselves while a non-white can yell racial animus and attack a white person unprovoked and avoid hate crime charges. In my state, there is no FBI hate crime charges when they are multiple hate crimes against whites in the local newspapers every year. The system is not fair to whites and I don't see it as legitimate.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Institutions only give advantages to demographics if that demographic is heavilly underrepresented in the institution. How are you going to say they discriminate against white people when just about every other employee is white?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

If you hire someone based upon race, that is racial discrimination.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Yeah, and? It was racial discrimination to only hire specific demographics in the first place. You aren't being victimized, you're deliberately rejecting context because you think they should only hire white men.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Yeah, and? It was racial discrimination to only hire specific demographics in the first place.

That is ridiculous because it depends on the selection process used to hire employees. If I had a perfect algorithm for selecting employees based upon ability and every employee selected was a white man it would not be racially biased unless I purposely tuned the algorithm to disregard a qualified non-white candidate. Also, some jobs pick employees that are "team oriented". It makes it even more likely that the unbiased algorithm would pick the white employee because racial diversity causes division in the workplace.

You aren't being victimized, you're deliberately rejecting context because you think they should only hire white men.

White people don't want to be victims, we want independence and sovereignty over our societies again. There will be some non-white employees but there will be a limited number of them and will be hired based on merit.

[–]DoubleReverse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

The alt right wants to be victims because you think it would justify your bigotry, but it wouldn't. Outside the context of your own personal land or business, you don't have a right to decide where other citizens are allowed to live or work, regardless of your sense of entitlement or the violation thereof.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

you don't have a right to decide where other citizens are allowed to live or work, regardless of your sense of entitlement or the violation thereof.

The sovereign group that holds power decides rights it gives to its subjects. Whether you care if it is fair or not doesn't matter. Nobody cares if you call it a big bad word because that is not how rights work.