Debate a "leftist"

submitted by DoubleReverse from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

"So, if we buy the land, and build our own institutions, what is your problem?"

None. People do that all the time, it's called a commune. I'm telling you you can't deny people access to public resources on the basis of skin color or any other aspect of their identity.

"No, we don't. If we tried to establish Orania in America, it would immediately be prosecuted for refusing to sell a stake to the first non-Afrikaner who tried to buy a stake."

Lol, that's hilarious, your eternal victimhood narrative is self-defeating!

As far as your victimhood goes, opposition to racism is not opposition to white people. If you don't want to be treated like a scumbag, then stop acting like a scumbag.

[–]frodo-baggins 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I don't think you understand what the words "self-defeating" mean.

So let me get this straight- No, you don't have any problem with us creating our own community. However, you find it hilarious that we will immediately be prosecuted for attempting to do so?

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You assume that an all white commune would be impossible because of your ideology of inherent victimhood, which is the only reason you think you need an all-white commune in the first place. That's pretty damn funny. Either your ideology invalidated itself or that was never your goal in the first place.

[–]frodo-baggins 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

No, it would be impossible because of the laws in this country. If we had laws similar to Mandela's South African constitution, that would not be the case.

You've said that you don't have a problem with us creating our own community, but you celebrate that we will be destroyed by malicious outside forces.

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Again, I think it's funny that you gave up on your idea for the exact same reason you thought it was necessary in the first place, and the supposed anti-whites never had to do anything or even indicate that they existed in the first place.

You can pretend not to understand all you want, I don't care what you make up about me.

[–]frodo-baggins 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

There literally is no legal way to do it in America. We need a self determination clause, as South Africa has.

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What's illegal about buying a plot of land and building whatever you want on it?

[–]frodo-baggins 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Because nonwhites would be refused to buy a stake, and then we would immediately get sued.

[–]DoubleReverse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You think you would get sued for not selling your land?

[–]frodo-baggins 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If I sold a plot to a White person, but refused to sell to a non-white person, then yes, I would be sued and/or prosecuted under current law.