you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GConly 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Jesus Screwtape, this is the most eye wrenching migraine inducing sub design possible.

You're also correct in some respects about gendercritical feminist.

It's basically Marxist theory with patriarchy subbed in as the oppressor. Most of them on GC (not all) are hard core anti capitalists as well as radfems. It's still adhering hardcore to the old Soviet era belief that all differences are down do socialisation, which is utter bollocks.

They post the same two authors that they claim support 'socialisation' in a loop and ignore the hundreds that have shown innate differences.

I think this and other Marxist based ideologies stick hard to 'no innate differences' because critical theory frames everything in term of oppressor Vs oppressed. Admitting innate differences means oppression isn't the main cause of differences in outcomes for race/gender/class. Can't have that getting out. How will Marxists get people to vote them into power if they don't feel helpless and victimised?

The facts have never supported no innate difference and the far left's intellectual leaders figured this out some time in the nineties. Everyone with any brain could see how that cookie was crumbling. It's why they ditched support for science in the nineties and started supressing hard science in the college's that it had a strong presence in. Now it's all lived experience and equity instead of facts... Or else.

Please please please change the sub design...

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

marxism is supposed to espouse scientific materialism. This means ignore religion and philosophies that are fake such as capitalism being good cuz of the invisible hand, and focusing on how the world really is. This should include race realism and gender realism. Many have pointed out Marx is "racist" and problematic and had certain views on women.

If we had socialism, meaning leftwing economic policies such as a new new deal, that would be like how in 1984 the theory of oligarchic collectivism said the rich would be swept away. One way the fight this with cultural marxism. That was similar to how they had ingsoc, English Socialism, instead of perpetual world revolution or interantional socialism. They didn't unite the entire world they had 3 factions agreeing to fight each other in proxy wars for eternity. We have that now with USA/Europe, Russia and china. We have people snitching on their frriends and family members and making them unpersons. We have 2 minute hate to hate trump or the other sides guy like Clinton. Weird tranny shit that you know is wrong so it's like 2+2=5.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus Screwtape, this is the most eye wrenching migraine inducing sub design possible.

Thank you.

Please please please change the sub design...

No. I am going to add animations and more mushrooms.

Also, why compliment me on my sub only to then ask me to change it? Makes no sense.

One mushroom for you, for the effort. Please come again.

My mods are very gay.

May Chris King bless you with resplendence, my son.