Jon & Vangelis - Horizon by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

neat

resplendence! by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

!!chat_widget

we must explode the dark heart of chaos by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

for resplendence!

synth by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

synth!

Same Shit, Different Day by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Just argue backwards from difference of outcome and allege discrimination. Patriarchy, wage gap, tranny insanity, male oppression -- it's all the same shit.

Maybe there just was a lack of black leadership. Maybe there just was a lack of female professionals. Maybe there just was a lack of trannies.

Feminist Compassion by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I guess I finally understand what feminists have been about all along. People are naturally angry when they lose their privileges, so that must be what cis-gender women are feeling about having to give up their privileges.

Same Shit, Different Day by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Look what victims we are! Now give us shit and stop questioning the facts and logic of our arguments!

Same lies as the White Ribbon campaign spread, some Gillette bullshit, same demonizing of men, same cry bully tactics. The cry bully is one of the biggest abusers of our time. Victimhood erases all logic, it justifies all cherry picking and you can distort statistics about male targets of domestic abuse as much as you like. You are helping women, after all. Erosion of due process, running roughshod over rights in family courts, misandry -- all because we're victims.

Get a taste of your own medicine, you feminist fucktards.

https://avoiceformen.com/featured/white-ribbon-australia-fraud-exposed/

You are all a bunch of cry bully liars.

See, the thing is that women are actually hurting themselves because they have internalized trans-misogyny. It's really hard to see privilege when you are the one privileged, so you women need to listen to the lived experience of trans-people, you see? Yes, once we have solved the inequality of trans-people, maybe then we can get to working on your silly complaints. After all, we didn't need to abolish the discrimination in the Selective Service Act, either. That wasn't consistent with our narrative of male oppression. Now, I am afraid your silly little hetero-normative cis-gender issues need to take a backseat, too, but we'll get to it. Wow, why are you so upset? You really must have a lot of toxic cis-gender normativity, don't you, honey? For the same reasons that men's suicide epidemic was self-imposed I guess you are just angry about the loss of your privilege in a cis-normative society. Men were simply upset about losing their privilege when boys fell behind on every metric of academic and professional achievement, and this is simply something you cis-gender people need to go through as well. Those sort of entitlement issues you need to work out between you and your toxic cis-entitlement. See, the rage that you are feeling is because of your cis-gender entitlement that is part of the patriarchy. Once we deconstruct that, you'll feel so much better. I am sorry, but you just need to deal with your entitlement issues. Here, look, we even have studies how oppressed trans-women are, coming out of the same sort of academia that pushed your feminist studies, and I'm afraid to tell you that you just aren't at the top of the victimhood pyramid anymore, love. So sorry. As Big Red would have said:

THAT IS PART OF THE PATRIARCHY!

Boo hoo hoo, cry me a river.

https://qz.com/587511/what-if-masculinity-was-killing-older-white-men/

HURR! FEMINISM IS ABOUT EQUALITY! by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The same bullshit arguments that "feminism is just about equality", the same hipocrisy, the same double speak, the same idiotic victomhood I hope radfems get to experience now.

Why are you people such bigots? Why would you be against equality?

Because sameness is not justice! That is not equality, neither with trans-people nor with men vs. women. Not all disparity of outcome is discrimination. Not all discrimination is unfair. We discriminate all the time between men and women.

Remember the frustrations countless people have had when pointing out the hipocrisy of feminism when it came to the selective editing of gender disparity in legislation, such as the rate at which women get custody or the Selective Service Act, or the differences in suicide.

"Oh, we'll get to that!", "Well, men are doing this to themselves. That's just their toxic masculinity."

Maybe it's the toxic heternormativity of radical feminists that they just can't realize what bigots they are. They must have internalized transphobia, those poor souls!

Same Shit, Different Day by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The same asinine re-interpretation and selective editing of history. Historical absence as proof of discrimination. Marxist oppression narratives. Trannies took the playbook of patriarchy theory and ran with it. Be it the debate about white/black differences, patriarchy, or trannies -- it's always the same tired nonsense.

You idiots did this to yourselves. They are completely consistent with your bullshit. The only way you have managed to argue against the tranny nonsense is capitulate, in your usual half-assed fashion, to some of the biological realities that exist between men and women, and even there only as far as serves you to rehabilitate the remains of your bullshit patriarchy theory.

Islam On Women by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another subject that is often misrepresented, or painted with too broad a brush, is the role of women in Islam. More than about any other system of social organization, there could probably not be more consensus about the oppression of women under Islam. As far as I am concerned, you could probably make a conclusive case that Islam is one of the cultures that has taken things too far in one direction.

But even here we tend to overlook the responsibilities and restrictions placed on men. Most of them are consistent with the biological tendency of assigning men the role of providers and women as the ones provided for. For the man, that means the burden of labor. For women, that means reduced agency and independence. What is false, though, is to think that there are no restrictions on men. Many regimes that are oppressive towards women are oppressive in general. For neither gender those cultures are a haven of liberty. At the very least, it's best to read first before coming to conclusions.

I know that men should not wear silk garments, but if a garment is made of party silk but is not silky,soft,shiny, and feminine looking and looks like wool (suit coat) then would it be ok?

Abu Moosa (may Allaah be pleased with him) reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Gold and silk have been permitted for the females of my ummah and forbidden for the males.” Indeed, a stern warning has been narrated concerning this matter, as was reported by al-Bukhaari (5853) and Muslim (2069) in the hadeeth of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with them both), who reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Silk is only worn in this world by the one who will have no share of the pleasure of the Hereafter.” Anas (may Allaah be pleased with him) reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever wears silk in this world will not wear it in the Hereafter.”

No, you might not care about wearing silk or gold and you might think that this is a silly example. The point is that our intuition that Islam might be completely correct, but we should still know in what ways exactly Islam is bad. We should also see that most such systems of social organization in some way tend to be consistent with male and female predisposition, even when they are exaggerated.

And, no, it should not mean that we should therefor continue to organize society in this way. One of the major reasons why men and women engaged in the division of labor and responsibilities the way they did was because it was a dangerous world and we had to use every biological advantage we could get, being hairless, clawless apes. Men and women are not enemies, they are collaborators. The world is dangerous enough without infighting. Nowadays, however, the role of the male protector is less and less needed. We can stop simping already. Women do not need protectors in the same way they used to and it is not surprising that some of our innate differences would cause resentment in modern society, for both men and women.

Praise be to Allah.

The ruling on men using cosmetics such as creams and so on varies from one case to another. To explain further:

Firstly:

In the case of things that are used only for the purpose of beautification or adornment, it is not appropriate for men to use them, because the woman is the one who needs beautification; what is appropriate for the man is the marks of masculinity such as roughness and toughness; being feminine or effeminate is not appropriate for him.

Those silly MRAs ... by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some more interesting bits:

"As against her husband, the law confers on a woman who has married him the unilateral privilege of main- tenance. The earlier law made this privilege dependent on her obedience, cohabitation with her husband, and her observance of outwardly decent behaviour. The present law has set her free from all these restraints. Since 1857 the Secular Courts which then assumed juris- diction in matrimonial matters, has given up all attempt to enforce obedience, but' the most violent methods, in- cluding imprisonment and sequestration of the property of the husband are employed to enforce her claim to maintenance. By a recent Statute (the Act of 1884) the process of imprisonment to make a wife obey an order to return to her husband was abolished. By the famous decision in the Jackson Case the husband was prohibited from himself using force to compel her to return. But the deserted wife by magisterial order can get her desert- ing husband sent to gaol. And neither legislature nor the Courts, which took away her duties of obedience and cohabitation, ever dreamt of depriving her of her privilege of being maintained by the man whom she can flout and insult with impunity. As a successful lady litigant (May, 1896) remarked to her husband, ** There is no law which compels me to obey or honour you, but there is a law that you must keep me." This woman tersely sums up the position."

Is it really that obvious that one gender was oppressed at the expense of the other? A deeper reading of history makes it less obvious the more you read.

It also does not matter what opinion you have on the particular source of these laws. All of them can be independently verified and where they are misrepresented, you are welcome to comment your corrections. Many other countries have -- or still have, in the case of India and others -- similar laws on the books.

I am neither on the side of people who say women were oppressed, nor am I that sure that the people who then run to the opposite extreme are correct. As a man, you have an amount of body strength that is easy to abuse against the vast majority of women. As a woman in society, you have many social protections in place that men have a harder time accessing. Patriarchy theory pretends that the supposed oppression of women is a modern thing and that we used to live in a state of egalitarianism in times prior. This could not be bigger nonsense. If anything, before modern society the biological advantages of men over women, which are some of the most obvious among all sex differences, would have been exacerbated. It is with modern society that women have been able to join a relatively equal footing with men, in an increasing range of occupations and social functions. Patriarchy theory, as most of feminist bullshit, is a complete inversion of history, putting common sense and facts on their head. It contradicts everything we know of history and it contradicts everything we know about biology or what we can intuit from everyday knowledge about men and women. The only women, and feminist men, who could be this far removed from reality are the ones so deranged from healthy social interaction that they probably rarely witness normal interactions between men and women.

Those silly MRAs ... by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A woman simply to be believed in court?! What an outdated notion! Surely, we would have progressed from such gendered discrimination in our modern and enlightened times.

What do I hear? "Believe all women?" #MeToo

Well, see that is only to compensate for the evils of men of PRIOR generations. See, we need to be biased in favor of women NOW because we have been so calloused towards their plight previously, see? It's all justice. Sure, we don't usually hold children accountable for the crimes of their parents -- what an outdated notion of injustice -- but in this case, you see, the inherent discrimination in our system continues to this day, and in order to right this wrong we just need to tip the scale into the other direction for a while, sort of like with black Americans, you see? Under patriarchy and in prior times, we never believed women! We simply believed men, you see? So now, in order for justice to be served, we just have to believe women for a while. I am glad you understand, now accept your sentence and go to prison for the next ten years. Several women have credibly accused you and surely you would not smear the name of these fine ladies.

Why do you not hear about legislation like this from feminists? by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/57842NCJRS.pdf

Under common law, a husband was held responsible for any crimes committed by his wife against a third party. Although a wife had responsibility for crimes she committed, there was a legal presumption that her husband compelled her to perform any act she undertook when he was present. Today, husbands and wives are equally liable for their own criminal actions.

https://law.jrank.org/pages/7458/Husband-Wife-Crimes.html

There were advantages and disadvantages both to being male and being female in society. It's pretty disingenuous to only show one side. How are you going to weigh it against each other? What metric are we going to use to tell which side had it worse?

Most oppression narratives are nonsense. There are clear examples of oppression in history but this one, which is so intimately tied with the biological differences between men and women, is likely not to be found in theories of patriarchy or social constructs but in our biology. If patriarchy is in biology, good luck trying to dismantle it. I guess trannies are trying regardless, though.

Something to balance the cherry picking of women's supposed oppression by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How Are Feminists Going to End Men in Positions of Leadership When Differences are Innate? by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One of the most hilarious self-owns of feminists has been one of their core pillars, which is that differences in outcome between men and women, now and across history, has been proof of oppression. Now that we have taken this thought to its logical conclusion and ignored the biological differences between men and women long enough, it is suddenly unfair that trans-women compete against women. There are no complaints about trans-men because their gender is less socially constructed, apparently. Now we hear that it's unfair. Why? Because men have innate advantages over women! Where is the patriarchy then? In biology? Is the patriarchal oppressor in our skeletal muscles? And how are we going to deconstruct it now?

You would expect that people with a brain would also reflect on other areas of society where men have exceeded women and that perhaps similar innate differences are responsible, not the oppression of women by men. Don't hold your breath, though, for feminists to think that far.

The idea of the patriarchy in feminism is trash. Once you toss it into the garbage, not much is left. That same is true for the so-called radfems that have been tossed off Reddit. I can't quite tell which of them are dumber: radfems or trannies. They both draw from the same playbook of victimhood and oppression, all validated by shoddy science, being oblivious to statistics, and reasoning backwards from outcomes. In all their drivel, replace "men" with "cis people" and you will find perfect ideological compliance.

Patriarchy is associated with a set of ideas, a patriarchal ideology that acts to explain and justify this dominance and attributes it to inherent natural differences between men and women.

I will be patiently waiting for radfems to get rid of patriarchy. Maybe, though, it would be much quicker and more entertaining to put all trannies and all feminists into a big arena and let them battle it out. I would hope that neither of them would be left after, but maybe we can napalm the area from above to get rid of whoever survives.

Either way, you people are both fucking morons. Just because you realize how dumb trannies are does not mean I am on your side. You still spout the same feminist bullshit and you can all go to hell.

The sociologist Sylvia Walby defines patriarchy as "a system of social structures and practices in which men dominate, oppress, and exploit women".

It's the same Marxist bullshit of victomology, repainting history, selective editing of facts, and focus on male privileges at the exclusion of male responsibility, such as defense of country or having to be criminally liable for one's wife.

Marxist theory, as articulated mainly by Friedrich Engels in The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, assigns the origin of patriarchy to the emergence of private property, which has traditionally been controlled by men. In this view, men directed household production and sought to control women in order to ensure the passing of family property to their own (male) offspring, while women were limited to household labor and producing children. Lerner disputes this idea, arguing that patriarchy emerged before the development of class-based society and the concept of private property. In stupidity it's right up there with the wage gap.

This will be part of a series "1001 Reasons Why Feminists Are Stupid Pieces Of Shit".

Trannies And Radical Feminism by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Radical_feminism

You heard it! Genital differences don't matter. Stop complaining about people with penises in restrooms, radfems.

BTW, this is a debate sub, bro.

The Patriarchy by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's no way to speak to your mother!

The Patriarchy by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck you! You're not my real dad!

Fuck Feminists by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Patriarchy by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You're nothing to my pink fist.

The Patriarchy by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You are a wonderful wombat. I still think I could take you in a fight, though. I have just started jogging again.

This Is Now A Gender Free Zone by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All gays are gender

This Is Now A Gender Free Zone by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hot af

This Is Now A Gender Free Zone by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

gayniggers from outer space

This Is Now A Gender Free Zone by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cock.

This Is Now A Gender Free Zone by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

too late. i destroyed them all

This Is Now A Gender Free Zone by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

all genders are gay

conspirrazie by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Noooooooo... that's so gay.....

This Is Now A Gender Free Zone by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gender is bullshit. Therefore your post is redundant.

Mods are gay by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm diagnosed with certified gayness.

The Patriarchy by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Rude of xer tbh. How did xer see that the person is a man? Women and other genders also have man looks and therefore can't manspread. This is a horrible stereotype. Xer is not representative of all man haters!

your mom's gay by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unfortunately not.

Wir Mussen Die Feministen Ausrotten! by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As you might all be aware by now, feminists have infiltrated this site. There can only be one solution to the feminist question. We must eradicate the feminist scourge. We will accept nothing short of a complete and total victory!

My Gender Critical Comment by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

marxism is supposed to espouse scientific materialism. This means ignore religion and philosophies that are fake such as capitalism being good cuz of the invisible hand, and focusing on how the world really is. This should include race realism and gender realism. Many have pointed out Marx is "racist" and problematic and had certain views on women.

If we had socialism, meaning leftwing economic policies such as a new new deal, that would be like how in 1984 the theory of oligarchic collectivism said the rich would be swept away. One way the fight this with cultural marxism. That was similar to how they had ingsoc, English Socialism, instead of perpetual world revolution or interantional socialism. They didn't unite the entire world they had 3 factions agreeing to fight each other in proxy wars for eternity. We have that now with USA/Europe, Russia and china. We have people snitching on their frriends and family members and making them unpersons. We have 2 minute hate to hate trump or the other sides guy like Clinton. Weird tranny shit that you know is wrong so it's like 2+2=5.

My Gender Critical Comment by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

women live life on tutorial mode

My Gender Critical Comment by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus Screwtape, this is the most eye wrenching migraine inducing sub design possible.

Thank you.

Please please please change the sub design...

No. I am going to add animations and more mushrooms.

Also, why compliment me on my sub only to then ask me to change it? Makes no sense.

One mushroom for you, for the effort. Please come again.

My mods are very gay.

May Chris King bless you with resplendence, my son.

My Gender Critical Comment by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]GConly 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus Screwtape, this is the most eye wrenching migraine inducing sub design possible.

You're also correct in some respects about gendercritical feminist.

It's basically Marxist theory with patriarchy subbed in as the oppressor. Most of them on GC (not all) are hard core anti capitalists as well as radfems. It's still adhering hardcore to the old Soviet era belief that all differences are down do socialisation, which is utter bollocks.

They post the same two authors that they claim support 'socialisation' in a loop and ignore the hundreds that have shown innate differences.

I think this and other Marxist based ideologies stick hard to 'no innate differences' because critical theory frames everything in term of oppressor Vs oppressed. Admitting innate differences means oppression isn't the main cause of differences in outcomes for race/gender/class. Can't have that getting out. How will Marxists get people to vote them into power if they don't feel helpless and victimised?

The facts have never supported no innate difference and the far left's intellectual leaders figured this out some time in the nineties. Everyone with any brain could see how that cookie was crumbling. It's why they ditched support for science in the nineties and started supressing hard science in the college's that it had a strong presence in. Now it's all lived experience and equity instead of facts... Or else.

Please please please change the sub design...

Ott - Smoked Glass And Chrome by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is now national anthem of deadbeef.

Zork! by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Had me one of those computers back then.

Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Good news! As you all might have heard by now, we are ever so slowly but surely converging towards a state of global consciousness. As the prophet Edgar Mitchell has predicted, the singularity of synchronicity of consciousness awaits us.

http://noosphere.princeton.edu/

Please focus your ESP energies on resplendence of your consciousness tonight. The noosphere will be filled with deadbeef this week.

https://somafm.com/deepspaceone/

Chris King: Patron Saint of Deadbeef. Resplendence! by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rx1afLXd8us

As most of you know, it really is all about resplendence. Resplendence is at the core of the dark heart. Resplendence is a win-win for the world. Resplendence! Resplendence! The future is resplendence.

The only way out of the karmic cycle of death and rebirth is exploding the dark heart of chaos, as we all know.

King, Chris. "Exploding the Dark Heart of Chaos: Part I." Prespacetime Journal 3, no. 3 (2012).

https://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/download/352/346

With resplendence, is there anything more in life worth striving for? There really isn't.

I submit motion to have Chris King elected patron saint of deadbeef, effective immediately.

More sine wave! by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Makes every shader better. http://glslsandbox.com/e#66482.0

http://glslsandbox.com/e#66475.0 by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Proof that tossing sine waves of time makes every GLSL shader better by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

http://glslsandbox.com/e#66481.0

title: was meant to read "tossing in"

Funky Shader by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

http://glslsandbox.com/e#66480.0

Look at parent of fork to see the original. Play around with inserting time variations in other portions of the code. You're a lucky bastard if you have a nice system with a fast GPU.

Maybe this is better: http://glslsandbox.com/e#66480.1

For maximum funk: http://glslsandbox.com/e#66480.2

Ray marching is sweet.

conspirrazie by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

reported for hate speech. enjoy your ban

I LOVE THIS SUB'S COLOR SCHEME by IAmSatan in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'll report this post to Screwtape for hateful transphobia.

I LOVE THIS SUB'S COLOR SCHEME by IAmSatan in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

WTF? You're gay. This sub's color scheme is an eye sore. Fuck you for liking this sub.

Annoying Piece of Shit by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He did actually lock this thread and I only saw after I tried replying. This was one of the most annoying things on this sub, yet.

I am proud. One day my mods will be just as gay as the ones on reddit. I have taught you well.

I LOVE THIS SUB'S COLOR SCHEME by IAmSatan in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

HAH

NEAT

I LOVE THIS SUB'S COLOR SCHEME by IAmSatan in deadbeef

[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The multiple triangle design looks like something I used to see on acid except that each line was moving left to right or right to left.

conspirrazie by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Self-hate. smh

I LOVE THIS SUB'S COLOR SCHEME by IAmSatan in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I LOVE ANEURYSMS!!! ALL MY SLAVES ARE ANEURYSMS!!!

I LOVE THIS SUB'S COLOR SCHEME by IAmSatan in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

it's epic, like I'm having an aneurysm

I LOVE THIS SUB'S COLOR SCHEME by IAmSatan in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

haha

Clown World Trannies by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lawl

locked for transphobia - I identify as something so this is offensive because I feel like it

SHITPOST! by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is a beautiful piece. Who's the painter?

Ah well. Locking this thread because I'm gay. lol

asfd by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]IAmSatan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Farts

I heard tattoo artists practice on bigs because they are close to humans by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

*pigs whatever

Mods are gay by [deleted] in deadbeef

[–]SeasideLimbs 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

hot