Sackler family wins immunity from opioid lawsuits

submitted by [deleted] from (bbc.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]UbiquitousCultOfSelf 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Can someone give me a tl;dr of why the onus is not on the user of said drugs?
To me, it's a given that opoid class of drugs would both be addictive AND not very good for anyone long-term. Where exactly should liability come in?
Someone made the comparison to cigarettes, but let's be honest, even if Dr.s were telling people "oh, it's healthy!" the logical person's response should have been, "Oh really, dr? Then come, let us set fire to your office, breathe that in for a good half hour, I'll be over across the street. Come talk to me after you've had a good cleansing few lung fulls of smoke!"

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Much like the covid vaccines, the Sacklers and the FDA convinced not just patients, but Doctors that their special patented controlled release formula was non-addictive and had bogus studies to 'prove' it. Many patients did not realize it was an 'opiate', and even if they did, were assured by their doctors that studies proved this new formulation was safe and non-addictive.

[–]StillLessons 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If there is one thing I have learned over the past 10 years, it is that physicians hold absolutely undeserved esteem for their position in society. Doctors are the priests of the new "$cientism" religion that is obliterating centuries of social norms because "they are smarter than us, right?" This is just like people thought the priests in the Middle Ages were "the smartest guys in the room." Belief in some special knowledge possessed by doctors which means we should accord their opinions "expert" status is the root of a tremendous proportion of the suffering in the world today.