BREAKING: FBI whistleblower @realSteveFriend revealed that bureau leadership received cash incentives to inflate the number of their “domestic extremism” cases! The FBI has been targeting our fellow Americans as “extremists” in order to abuse their power.

submitted by Chipit from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Lie. This is fake news.

Fake Claim #1 - Chipit is lying when he says that anyone was incentivised to "inflate" cases of domestic extremism.

Truth: Actually, in the video cited by chipit, Gaetz says the following:

"one of the things Steve Friend bought forward in his whistleblower report is that there were cash incentives given to people in FBI leadership based on case volume."

There's nothing cited by chipit which indicates anything to do with domestic extremism. So how did that part get added to chipit's claim? It got added by a domestic extremist, is my guess.

Fake Claim #2 - Gaetz in chipit's video claims that Friend reported "that there were cash incentives given to people in FBI leadership based on case volume". This was a lie by Gaetz.

Truth: actually this wasn't said by Steve Friend at all! And certainly not part of his whistleblower report. The House committee released the full transcript pdf and cspan has their autosubs available online. He didn't say it.

It was actually said by Garret O'Boyle on Fox news. Somewhere in this video which I don't care to watch.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/whistleblower-willing-homeless-hands-fbi-speak-out

?? Claim #3 - "there is a system in the FBI where the executive management does get a cash bonus if they get gold checkmarks in certain criteria" is the claim made by O'Boyle in the video, as cited by fox below the video.

Truth: who cares? Did anyone care before today how the DoJ maintained gold standards in its field offices? Private sector executives get stock and I know ASAC Hank Schrader isn't walking around with federal treasury certificates. So I don't care whether they use a cash bonus system, I just care that we get through a year without on-site molestations or slippin jimmy lawsuits or whatever fucking KPIs the field offices use. I don't care

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Just so everyone knows, the above is a paid poster trying to disrupt our conversations on this site. Click the "block user" button above and disengage.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I kind of doubt @Site_rly_sux is paid to troll, as untreated mental illness is far more likely. Just going off comments I've seen in the past day or two though.

The thing I dislike about blocking dysfunctional users is it disables your perspective of reality. Thomas Grays conclusion (bastardized to 'ignorance is bliss') is correct, however the downside is you've cut the flow of information from your environment. Imo, awareness trumps happiness. But who knows? Maybe that's just because:

You haven't a thought of your own, as you've parroted far right abuses and disinformation at Saidit for years and anyone who doesn't join you in the circle jerk you label a leftist and block them, so that you can continue parroting the same far right lies like a good gimp for the .01%.

😁 (This is what you'd miss if you blocked trolls!)

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Weird how the paid posters automatically jump in to defend the powerful and crap on the little guy. Exactly the opposite you'd expect, especially on a site dedicated to dissident political content and free speech. Who writes long graduate student-like research comments telling people off for exposing billion dollar megacorporations for fucking us over?

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not really the opposite. A percentage have always sucked up to the powerful. "Bro, let me be your minion and I'll defend you for the benefits of complicity."

Saidit is pretty far from free speech (hence, my absence), and dissident political content here is far to the left of sites I've been using, despite the trolls that attracts.

As for the "graduate student-like research comments telling people off", your and my reactions kind of point away from that being a paid propagandist, unless I'm still overestimating average IQ. I think a genuine propagandist would look to 'fit in' more, and not be so contrary and obvious.

Regardless, commentary in the near future will likely be dominated by AI bots, if it isn't already on the more popular platforms.