you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"Lucifer" literally means "The bringer of Light" allegorically the ruler of multiple solar systems around and including ours, and hierarchically above Satan, who was God's chosen ruler for this world.

As far as I understand it, the Luciferan revolution was a good and necessary thing for the evolution of the human mind, and not actually evil. It is Satan's horrors that one should fear, and not Lucifer, who wished only to gift us with higher reasoning and mental capabilities.

Satan is truly evil, but not Lucifer. Now, people often use these two figures interchangeably and this is a very misguided mistake. They are as different as anything ever was.

In more detail as they make themselves known again to me, Lucifer's plan was to distance somewhat Man from the Light of the divine, in order for Man to develop his own capacity for Intelligence, something he could never achieve if the Light of "God" is constantly guiding him. This guidance is called "upward evolution" through the hierarchies of the cosmic orders of intelligences. He wished to gift us with "downward evolution" which could replace millions of years of upward evolution with a few decades of downward evolution.

It was risky but there is so much to be gained!

Satan, seeing that the plan was to take some distance from the light, sought to bring about absolute darkness in the minds of men and in general on the Earth. Enslaving Man, reducing his life to an experience of torture, suffering, heartbreak and pain was his plan. Why? Because the energies that are within us are actually very pure, so BLEEDING us from it and feeding off it is very delicious for his order of (lower) entities.

So the difference is absolute. Does this guy mean actual Lucifer? Or does he mean Satan and uses Lucifer interchangeably? Of course he would know the difference, but would he write the plain truth down, or would he not disinform the letter at least to some degree? Yeah probably the latter and he used "Lucifer" for meaning "Satan". Maybe.

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I mean, I see your point I guess, but this guy is also the head of the KKK as well as one of the top Freemasonry guys. Both those organizations were/are not doing good things, imo. Judge the tree by the fruit it bears, you know?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, they may have, in their own twisted ways, goals that aim to be good, and the mistakes are being committed in the methods being used.

For example, let's say they have some objective that they hold as the supreme good for mankind. Then they might say, well any means to get there are OK since they lead to goodness. They would be misguided in that "evil" would be guiding their minds to begin with and thus, make them believe that only methods they can imagine lead to said "good" goal.

They would be wrong of course because Reality does not depend on human mind in order to exist or function. As such, intellect, even the most massively overpowered such as the one I was endowed with at birth - it's destroyed by mercury poisoning now, moreso every day that goes by - can only make a puny and hugely insufficient effort at understanding Reality itself, and even moreso at guiding events toward a "supremely good" goal which one entrusts said wildly insufficient intellect at divining.

I for one, hold that humans cannot know "good" and "evil". The closest approximations one might make are, as my friend Earendil said, "life affirming" and "life negating".

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Everyone sees themselves as the good guy in their own story. That doesn't mean objectively terrible things don't exist. The road to hell is paved with good intentions after all.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed!