you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zapped 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Like the top comment says, it should be easy to see if someone or several people dropped off huge stacks of ballots that day. Otherwise, they had to have been inserted between pickup and delivery, which would be part of a big conspiracy, or added at the counting station and written up as coming from the drop box, which would be part of an even bigger conspiracy. Of course, this also needs to be confirmed by more than the gentleman being interviewed in this video clip.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Should be an episode on Ancient Aliens

[–]Zapped 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Nope. Simple investigative skills would do the trick, unless there is an effort to block an investigation. By law, there is supposed to be chian-of-custody in all ballots, including mail-in. If there are discrepancies, then that shows a break-down and potential fraud. Any effort to suppress will act further to discredit past and future elections, whether real fraud exists or not.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

(I'm joking about the fraudulent claims that there was substantial fraud at that dropbox. Yes, normal people know that there will be no reliable video clip of the stuffing of 19000 fraudulent votes, as this is obvious GOP dead horse kicking propaganda meant to argue for greater voter supression. Hence - in that video: aliens.)

[–]package 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The claim is that 19000 ballots were attributed to the drop box, not that 19000 ballots were physically stuffed into it by one or more of the 24 people who visited the box

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good point - and still no appropriate evidence is provided on Twitter about the claim of 19000 votes or also that 18976 people did not visit the drop box. A bloke's unsubstantiated claims on Twitter are not reliable, as we learned from Twittler.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Every illegal vote is a legal vote suppressed.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes...

[–]WhoFlu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Precisely, what pisses me off is that a simple investigation by those with law-enforcement powers could have easily caught a good number of people, with enough evidence to file charges. It doesn't have to be "to overturn the election," but rather what Democrats learned from the last election is that they can get away with mass fraud, and the only consequence will be their opponents complaining. No ballots tossed. Nobody sent to jail.