Judge Rips Kids Away From Moms Who Get Caught Not Wearing Masks

submitted by scrubking from nationalfile.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Bigs 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

There's no "ripping away", just temporarily stopping shared contact - something men have had to fight for, for decades and at huge expense, just to have taken away for the flimsiest of "reasons".

But now it's problem, when it happens to women?

Cry me a river?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Moreover - this appears to be only about one incredibly selfish person, who is such a selfish asshole that she had difficulty wearing masks in order to avoid this court case, which is meant to protect her son, who has asthma (and thus getting COVID19 could kill him): "she finally signed an agreement to get limited time with her 14-year old son who has asthma but still must wear a mask during visits."

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Just for the record not a single child with asthma has been killed by covid.

This is about enforcing compliance. It's a control technique. Forcing people to do things that are obviously unnecessary is a way to break their spirit and make them more obedient.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just for the record not a single child with asthma has been killed by covid.

You don't know this. The ongoing studies indicate that asthma patients suffer more from COVID19. Data about the causes of death is still in development. It's strange that you can make your comment with such confidence when you could not possibly have the evidence to support it.

This is about enforcing compliance. It's a control technique. Forcing people to do things that are obviously unnecessary is a way to break their spirit and make them more obedient.

Again - there is no reliable evidence for this. It's a kind of psychobabble.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Socks, there is no psychobabble in what that canned bot is saying there. I saw a kid playing outside, alone, climbing a tree, all the while wearing a mask. This is the new normal. I remember the very first week every major company had commercials talking about the new normal. Don't ever try to obfuscate this one issue. They are forcing healthy people to wear masks, and children are being raised by the left/right rabble to think and expect that this is right and proper.

I understand that some people want to wear masks to try and protect themselves, and I understand a sick person wearing a mask if they ever need to go in public (if they so desire), but I will never ever in a million years understand your (and the GovCorps) incessant need to try and force healthy people into wearing a mask (or two!). Edit: it is obviously a psychological operation at this point.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well - I do feel sorry for the kid wearing a mask outside, especially while on his own. Indeed there are obvious overreactions (and underreactions). It seems odd to me, however, that the management of the pandemic (even for those who don't see it as such) in the US has been so bad (and badly managed in the UK, Spain, Italy &c). Is it all a PSYOP? If it is, they (GovCorp?) really suck at it. The only official PSYOPs I know about are verified military PSYOPs. I often worry about the spread of disinforamtion by propaganda news corporations such as Sinclair, which I would argue is definitely a PSYOP (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvtNyOzGogc), and it's worked.