Judge Rips Kids Away From Moms Who Get Caught Not Wearing Masks

submitted by scrubking from nationalfile.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Bigs 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

There's no "ripping away", just temporarily stopping shared contact - something men have had to fight for, for decades and at huge expense, just to have taken away for the flimsiest of "reasons".

But now it's problem, when it happens to women?

Cry me a river?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Moreover - this appears to be only about one incredibly selfish person, who is such a selfish asshole that she had difficulty wearing masks in order to avoid this court case, which is meant to protect her son, who has asthma (and thus getting COVID19 could kill him): "she finally signed an agreement to get limited time with her 14-year old son who has asthma but still must wear a mask during visits."

[–]RightousBob 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

I truly hope that you are nothing more than the sponsored partisan/pharma shill that you've exposed yourself to be. Because if you happen to be a parent yourself ( which I doubt you are, given how repulsive and unattractive you are ) you are truly a horrible human being for this comment and all you do to support the destruction of families under the guise of health and safety. This case is proof positive that COVID is nothing more than an excuse for increased tyranny and state sponsored oppression. Masks are virtue signaling and nothing more, (and you know it) and Covid is NOT a mortal threat to 99.9% of the population (and that is plain to see in state reported statistics). Yet here you are cheering the destruction of a family at the hands of the state. You are the worst kind of scum! If you are, or ever become a parent, I hope your child grows up to read your vile and uneducated views and promptly disowns your ass. You are a soulless coward, and I am disgusted to share the same planet with you.

[–]Bigs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Virtually ALL divorces (and less formal splits among parents) are instigated by the woman, not least because they know damn well that most of the time they will get the kids, the house, the allthemoney and the "child" support.

This RARE FUCKING OCCASION that a woman pulls a family apart and SHE loses custody or contact, now it's a tragedy? Now it's so sad to see? Now it's "destruction of the family"?

Your passion is great, but try aiming it where it's deserved.

[–]RightousBob 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

My grievance is with the state not the parents.

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If a woman actually lost custody of her kids to the father in the Western world then she's a truly terrible mother, because the courts are so heavily biased against men that only the worst of the worst mothers ever lose custody. So aim your grievance at her.

Regarding masks, sure they're a joke and just for show and social custom, doing jack shit to protect anyone from a virus. Her willingness to flout social custom and rules is likely just another symptom of all-round bad behavior, even if we can agree the rule is a stupid one. Far too many women take the view "Rules don't apply to me, because I have a vagina".

That they are often correct in the Western world today is a major part of why the Western world is so cucked and fucked now.

RIP.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Bob - what would motivate anyone to be a 'shill' on Saidit, arguing with 10 people?

Regarding vaccines, masks, social distancing, COVID19, &c, I hope you appreciate that 99% of the planet appreciates that these are important. It's not just my opinion. And - most importantly - I do not have to come to Saidit to discuss them. Reasonable information about them is ubiquitous. I know one anti-vax person, a cousin, whom I like but will never convince regarding vaccines or medical history. The evidence she kindly sends me is entirely developed with disinformaiton and misinformation. Think about the of the sources used by anti-vaxers and those used by the 99% of the world. The latter is science, for former isn't. Now think about the unhinged, angry post you've sent me, and the many others. Remove me from this conversation and you will still be angry with 99% of the world regarding vaccines. Is that necessary? Do you have information that they don't? No, you don't. And you don't have to take out your anger on strangers at Saidit. There are much deeper issues here that you will want to consider, but you don't have to listen to me regarding them. Best wishes.

[–]RightousBob 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Saidit is frontier land compared to the state controlled social platforms of twatter and faceslap and that is why you are here, to sway opinion and to try to mold this site into what the others have become, echo chambers of controlled groupthink. I'm sure saidit is not your only haunt just like I'm certain that this is not your only account. You are a weak sauce shill, consult your flow charts lackey.