None of the explanations offered up so far to explain the Flynn case make any sense. Throw in the bizarre behavior of the judge and it suggests there is something behind all of this that is much bigger than General Flynn.

submitted by Chipit from thezman.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Nonsense. Obama told Trump the day after the election about Flynn so Trump is in on it too?

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Obama knew that Flint wasn't "colluding" with the Russians, they all did. You're behind on this. Watch Jimmy Dore. The only reason this isn't "bigger than Watergate" is because the people who made "Watergate" a historical flash point don't want to do the same to the Obama presidency.

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Complete bullshit. Jimmy Dore....LMMFAO......I thought you meant real news sources.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

He's more honest and has better news than the "real news sources", all of whom backed the Iraq war that they knew to be a lie, and who routinely support corporatist candidates in elections. Fuck the "real news sources."

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Honest maybe but factual and actually having access to the facts, no? I'd rather read the actual court documents and have.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The original 302s that were filled out by FBI agents said Flynn did NOT lie. A little editing by Sztrock changed the outcome, just like the guy that changed "He is a CIA asset" to "He is NOT a CIA asset" in regards to Carter Page. They were about to close the case against Flynn, because there was "no derogatory evidence" against him. I suggest you read the DOJ Motion to Dismiss. It goes in to the details.

https://thehill.com/regulation/496649-read-doj-motion-to-dismiss-flynn-case

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here, read the actual files

https://old.reddit.com/r/Keep_Track/comments/ghcupg/the_flynn_timeline_revisited_a_fivealarm_fire/