you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Flynn was not under oath #1 and he did not lie #2. The original 302s that were filled out by FBI agents said Flynn did NOT lie. A little editing by Sztrock changed the outcome, just like the guy that changed "He is a CIA asset" to "He is NOT a CIA asset" in regards to Carter Page. They were about to close the case against Flynn, because there was "no derogatory evidence" against him. I suggest you read the DOJ Motion to Dismiss. It goes in to the details.

https://thehill.com/regulation/496649-read-doj-motion-to-dismiss-flynn-case

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Holy shit, you are brainwashed. He lied about his conversations with the Russian ambassodor. he admitted to it.....twice!

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Flynn's behavior is not the issue- the Obama administration tried to sabotage the incoming administration by goading him into a process crime. Definitely an abuse of power.

I can say this, you can't find anything even remotely close to the level of corruption that is weaponizing the FBI and DOJ like was done by Obama. His administration spied on the opposing party nominee and President elect. Framed people working for him. Blackmailed them into pleading guilty to crimes they didn't commit. This is Watergate on steroids. You can pretend it isn't if you want, your choice.

Obama - there is no precedence for letting a liar off Scot free

Um...James Cartwright anyone????

2017 - General James Cartwright lied to FBI, pardoned by Obama

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Nonsense. Obama told Trump the day after the election about Flynn so Trump is in on it too?

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Obama knew that Flint wasn't "colluding" with the Russians, they all did. You're behind on this. Watch Jimmy Dore. The only reason this isn't "bigger than Watergate" is because the people who made "Watergate" a historical flash point don't want to do the same to the Obama presidency.

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Complete bullshit. Jimmy Dore....LMMFAO......I thought you meant real news sources.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

He's more honest and has better news than the "real news sources", all of whom backed the Iraq war that they knew to be a lie, and who routinely support corporatist candidates in elections. Fuck the "real news sources."

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Honest maybe but factual and actually having access to the facts, no? I'd rather read the actual court documents and have.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The original 302s that were filled out by FBI agents said Flynn did NOT lie. A little editing by Sztrock changed the outcome, just like the guy that changed "He is a CIA asset" to "He is NOT a CIA asset" in regards to Carter Page. They were about to close the case against Flynn, because there was "no derogatory evidence" against him. I suggest you read the DOJ Motion to Dismiss. It goes in to the details.

https://thehill.com/regulation/496649-read-doj-motion-to-dismiss-flynn-case

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)