all 18 comments

[–]joewest1313 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Deep state has deep reach

[–]The_Lear_Bluce_Ree 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I personally think that he has something that can bury Obama. You barely heard a peep out of him (Obama) until the Flynn pardon thing started now he's talking to anyone who will listen.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think the "Russia hacking" was a euphemism for Israeli hacking.

A redacted FBI document was recently released stating this was the case.

This single FBI document contains more tangible evidence than was introduced during the entire "Russia Gate" charade.

[–]whistlepig 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yea... whatever it is, Obama is clearly neck deep. He has shown every sign that he'd be more than happy to be off the stage.

[–]asg101 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is generally safe to take NOTHING that the government says or does at face value, there are always hidden agendas and motives for everything they do.

[–]solarsavior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sounds like you’re ready to learn what all of this “Q” stuff is about. When you watch the news with your new eyes you will understand.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh come on. Meuller is secretly working with Trump to expose corruption? Qanon is someone's joke that took off and worked beyond his wildest dreams.

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Yeh he's guilty. The Government's lawyers got 2 confessions from him and sent him to jail, Trump replaced the AG who was loyal to him. The original lawyers quit when the AG decided to again to quash the charges at Trump's behest, the judge who it comes before knows what's going on and on a sheer matter of law asks, "Why did you prosecute him and now you want to free him?" A very legit question. The answer to your question is a very corrupt President and AG.

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Flynn was not under oath #1 and he did not lie #2. The original 302s that were filled out by FBI agents said Flynn did NOT lie. A little editing by Sztrock changed the outcome, just like the guy that changed "He is a CIA asset" to "He is NOT a CIA asset" in regards to Carter Page. They were about to close the case against Flynn, because there was "no derogatory evidence" against him. I suggest you read the DOJ Motion to Dismiss. It goes in to the details.

https://thehill.com/regulation/496649-read-doj-motion-to-dismiss-flynn-case

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Holy shit, you are brainwashed. He lied about his conversations with the Russian ambassodor. he admitted to it.....twice!

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Flynn's behavior is not the issue- the Obama administration tried to sabotage the incoming administration by goading him into a process crime. Definitely an abuse of power.

I can say this, you can't find anything even remotely close to the level of corruption that is weaponizing the FBI and DOJ like was done by Obama. His administration spied on the opposing party nominee and President elect. Framed people working for him. Blackmailed them into pleading guilty to crimes they didn't commit. This is Watergate on steroids. You can pretend it isn't if you want, your choice.

Obama - there is no precedence for letting a liar off Scot free

Um...James Cartwright anyone????

2017 - General James Cartwright lied to FBI, pardoned by Obama

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Nonsense. Obama told Trump the day after the election about Flynn so Trump is in on it too?

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Obama knew that Flint wasn't "colluding" with the Russians, they all did. You're behind on this. Watch Jimmy Dore. The only reason this isn't "bigger than Watergate" is because the people who made "Watergate" a historical flash point don't want to do the same to the Obama presidency.

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Complete bullshit. Jimmy Dore....LMMFAO......I thought you meant real news sources.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

He's more honest and has better news than the "real news sources", all of whom backed the Iraq war that they knew to be a lie, and who routinely support corporatist candidates in elections. Fuck the "real news sources."

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Honest maybe but factual and actually having access to the facts, no? I'd rather read the actual court documents and have.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The original 302s that were filled out by FBI agents said Flynn did NOT lie. A little editing by Sztrock changed the outcome, just like the guy that changed "He is a CIA asset" to "He is NOT a CIA asset" in regards to Carter Page. They were about to close the case against Flynn, because there was "no derogatory evidence" against him. I suggest you read the DOJ Motion to Dismiss. It goes in to the details.

https://thehill.com/regulation/496649-read-doj-motion-to-dismiss-flynn-case