you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

In review, Wikispooks is place to find poorly sourced information and many conspiracy theories. This is not a credible source for information. (1/19/2017) Updated (D. Van Zandt 3/8/2018)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikispooks/

[–]Robin[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Haha, yeah. Depends on your definition of credibility. It differs radically from Wikipedia on many topics, such as culpability for 9/11. I find it a lot more credible, particularly as regards the deep state. That's why I posted it here.

[–]Robin[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's what MBFC says about WS. For the converse: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check