10,000 gallons of jet fuel

submitted by raven9 from (zg3z.com)

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]FeralSparky 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

A size difference does not mean its not possible. This graph is pointless. You can put anything up against that building and make the same argument.

How about the worlds most powerful nuke? Its only 28 feet long. But it would completely obliterate New York.

https://i.imgur.com/x7c5mFz.jpg

The green bit is the nuke.

[–]raven9[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Kerosine jet fuel is a liquid fuel with properties similar to gasoline. All those with common sense can evaluate how far a liquid fuel is likely to stretch. 10,000 gallons would fill about the size of a small 12'x12' bedroom. Build a model of that building 6ft tall and take a the proportionate amount of gasoline the size of a pea and try to replicate what that amount of fuel was supposed to have done on 9/11. Not going to happen.

[–]FeralSparky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You guys are so full of shit its unreal.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You might as well show one PG&E transformer next to a forest. THE WTC was built to be taken down.

[–]raven9[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think the point is to question whether that amount of fuel could cause both the big fireball at the impact point as well as blowing up the lobby 90 stories below.