you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeyImSancho 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sure, let's talk, stop the useless global shipping first.... But the damn climatistas won't hear of that. No, we must be taxed to death, while our god damned overlords shit their way across the world in private jets telling us how fucking horrible we are, right? I mean that's the reality of the situation.

From there, what's our climate supposed to be like exactly? At this point in my life, I believe almost zero of what academia has to offer; it's all lobbied, and studies bought.

In regards to the OP, yeah, in my opinion, a fairly 'cunty' title, and message. The little witch, I mean angel that this is all about, put herself on the political world stage, just like that fag, Hogg. They are open to scrutiny, they are open to discussion, but this OP, 'don't hurt, or blame the children?' Give me a break.

So yeah, I'm all good with climate discussions, and all sorts of stuff, but when snide remarks come out, fuck, why not join in, everyone for the most part anymore is entirely out for themselves; it's what academia, and society has been trained to be.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yep yep, this is not an issue that requires working class folks to make any lifestyle changes. We didn't cause it and we sure as shit can't fix it, assuming anything even needs to be fixed.

I think the "consensus" studies are legit, but all they ask is "do humans contribute to climate change?" Of course we do, but how much is a huge mostly unanswered question. The media spins this yes/no question into something it isn't.

[–]HeyImSancho 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks for the response. I key in on 'assuming anything even needs to be fixed'. It brings to mind the Amazon.

I was shocked to learn that the Amazon burns every year, and that this year was basically 'average' in burn years. I was, and am further shocked that the oxygen it produces, is exactly cancelled out by the amount of methane, and CO2 it produces. In actuality, it's net zero. I find that a shocker considering all that I've ever heard about it.

Then to realize that they've proven it's overgrowth, and overburden, that once was a highly populated area, with some of the largest cities of prehistory. Seriously a shocker, and it begs the question, of how many times are we lead by our noses into sanctified belief structures built off of lies.

I just roll with the punches, mainly concentrate on my own self development; I think the world would be better if more did this. Yet, it seems we live in a world where many to most demand others curtail to their whims, desires, and commands. Weird world, lol.

[–]raven9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The thing is, after the forests burned are they left to recover naturally or do the global corporations see it as an excuse to bulldoze it all and make plantations.