you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are a few videos of people, now censored filming the closest hospitals during and well after the event. Many whom called as well. Nobody was taken to the two closest hospitals, even the one with triage.

Also, look up kearnsy74's videos now deleted off YouTube depicting clear evidence that most of the individuals were transported to the Marriott Hotel, not the hospital. This was also the case with the alleged London bridge attack. The latter is actually a case closed anomaly as the hospital was 400 feet away, yet all those who were allegedly injured were transported away from the hospital.

I also posted a recent video on the alleged Boston Bombing and have many videos saved two of which provide the clearest evidence of what I like to call "hyper-active drill participants late for work."

Two eyewitnesses who publicized the raw footage of the alleged Boston Bombing were able to walk through the zone in which the pyrotechnic bomb detonated in a controlled fashion. These two individuals were not part of the drill and were quickly excorted away from the scene after they were spotted by agents. Others were also thrown to the ground by plain clothed individuals who have now after 6 years been exposed as undercover FBI agents, Counter-intelligence agents and oddly, air force personal, naval intelligence personal, and ARMY PSYOP division officers. Now, what are they doing there?

There goal was to clear the event of any non-participants, by any means necessary. Even by forcefully throwing a women to the ground. Luckily, raw footage captured two drill participants late for work.

One rather old lady ran towards the bombing a few minutues after it had exploded. She had no signs of injuries, no blood, and was able to walk to the detonation spot and lay down. She then, with the help of a plain clothed agent applies blood around her face and a weird moulage arm strap.

We are talking about a women who was not even near the bombing at the time, completely uninjured, only to walk to the area of detonation, lay down and apply moulage.

It is clear evidence of fakery.

We also have the 2nd bombing where the pyrotechnic device was placed on a small tree.

Interestingly, the tree experienced ABSOLUTELY NO DAMAGE to the bark. Plastic cups remained in their position despite being 8 feet away from detonation. It is preposterous for this to happen, unless we take into account that this was a hyper-active drill conducted on the American people, with Taxpayer money. Clearly, fakery was involved.

So, it is clear they can fake these events with the use of hyper-active drills.

That is why we will never see non-doctored surveillance footage or the full surveillance footage of any of these questionable events. We only are given the basics and highly staged photos. In fact, agents, at the Boston Bombing were able to set up vicsim participants staged photos as the pyrotechnic device exploded. They quickly went to the scene and directed the particpants. Their job was to obtain the needed propaganda photos for the media. A few Reuter photographers were involved who were interestingly able to capture various other alleged terrorist bombings and alleged mass shootings, AS THEY UNFOLDED. Huh. Always in the right place at the right time, coincidence?

You might want to watch UK's other videos on the alleged Fort Lauderdale and Orlando shooting too. Those are also well done and are far more detailed than the manchester overview documentary.