If they play this correctly, and I suspect they will, we’ll be told the “shooter” was “radicalized” by Internet “conspiracy theories” which will seal the deal on the new threat of “domestic terrorism” from “conspiracy theorists.” Anyway, the shooting was a fake drill, and a bad one at that.

submitted by Jesus from (self.conspiracy)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CompleteDoubterII 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Here we go again. I don't follow mass shootings, but prepare for weird coincidences and FBI connections. (Is it possible that instead of never happening, mass shootings were false flags helped along or perpetrated by the authorities? Not that I'm going to investigate this, but it's an idea I've never seen considered, only the official story must be correct or the thing is a hoax.)

To avoid misinformation, check out the thread on Metabunk dedicated to this shooting.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

metabunk is a shill site, that was started in order to push the status quo 9/11 narrative. I was banned there twice and many people are banned there for simply posting things that THEY CAN'T debunk. They only go after the low hanging fruit.

Here, watch this, they fake almsot everything, worldwide, it isn't just in the US, but some multinational intelligence unit doing these things, get some popcorn while you are at it. The video creator and investigator has hundreds of other videos, illustrating the fakery and outright conflicting narratives of these events, all intentional by the way:

https://153news.net/files/videos/2018/04/28/1524953561cb5d5-360.mp4

^ ^ ^ Just wait for it to load... THE high profile shootings in the US will always be table-top exercises. Few are real.

[–]CompleteDoubterII 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You had a Metabunk account? What was your username? I'd like to look through some of your postings there.

Can you provide any evidence of them banning people for posting things they can't debunk? In any case, even if Metabunk is a shill site, consider all pieces of information, even if it does come from a highly biased shill. And of course, Metabunk is not the be-all-and-end-all of investigation. (They actually believed Assad gassed his own people.)

I'm not into investigating mass shootings, but I might watch it later on.