If they play this correctly, and I suspect they will, we’ll be told the “shooter” was “radicalized” by Internet “conspiracy theories” which will seal the deal on the new threat of “domestic terrorism” from “conspiracy theorists.” Anyway, the shooting was a fake drill, and a bad one at that.

submitted by Jesus from (self.conspiracy)

A little child, w/o a parent BTW, ran into the mall and said there’s an “active shooter” at Walmart. Anyone who’s been around children knows this is legit bc they ALWAYS use formal terms like “active shooter.” Then this dude heard the shots while in the mall at Foot Locker!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBFjMQjXUAAxjvw.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBFjMNqW4AIU2NG.jpg

As usual, very lucky to have had a coincidental training, otherwise it could’ve been a lot worse! Obviously a connection between local police, Walmart, & this company Aegis as they tweeted about the Mississippi Walmart “shooting” & recent training there also.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBFwVrkXoAADc0K.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBFwVrqWsAUmuc0.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBFwVrnX4AAPd7Q.jpg

The FBI is examining a manifesto that referenced the Christchurch shooting and indicated the “attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas.”

So dumb.

Reporter Scott Stedman has tweeted that the FBI has told him that the manifesto had been circulating on 8Chan.

Very trustworthy, 8chan honeypot site.

8Chan is a controversial message board that has been described as “the home of the most vitriolic content on the internet.”

Stedman has read it and says the manifesto is “4 pages long. It is vile, references white supremacist literature and is filled with seething hatred towards Hispanics and immigrants.”

Considering the entire shooting is most likely fake, what's the agenda here?

all 29 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]E73nf73jd7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Manifesto appeared 2 hrs after the shooting

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, just like the garlic shooting. A white racist that has a grandfather that is spanish and the racist is also Iranian? ROFLAO!

These narratives are created well in advance.

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well if it did, then who posted it, and is it really his. It's not of course, because the shooting was a phony fake show. The manifesto narrative only serves the covert agenda of TPTB. Liek every other manifesto. And the media reported on it as his, before anyone really new if it was his, which it isn't because the shooting is fake.

[–]E73nf73jd7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

We found all this before the news...a tweet confirmed the manifesto got posted 2 hrs later without his name but to his account. They washed his online presence but we got enough...same with the 2nd guy who's a registered democrat. We found so much evidence that it's all antifa but it's the dame commie agenda the left pushes on reddit/4chan

Just hateful people who want chaos...they want a civil war and race violence.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've heard this same narrative in all these PSYOP shootings. The agenda was to garner the money needed for El Paso to build a new fire and polcie department. The shooting was a drill. Everything else, is theater.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you new, you just decided to post this?

[–]E73nf73jd7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Someone suggested from T_D that we migrate hete... I'm being heavily censored and limited to a few places so I'm trying to get what we find elsewhere. I am legit scared they'll come after me because of my posts and other things so im.trhing to figure this out...reddit has me stuck to T_D...censored elsewhere...they want to make this look like qanon snd antifa when its just antifa andi want as much everywhere as I can in case they find me or I have to run

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On 8chan, which is an anonymous forum. I don't know why the media is acting so certain the two are linked, it could've easily been manufactured by someone else.

[–]CompleteDoubterII 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Here we go again. I don't follow mass shootings, but prepare for weird coincidences and FBI connections. (Is it possible that instead of never happening, mass shootings were false flags helped along or perpetrated by the authorities? Not that I'm going to investigate this, but it's an idea I've never seen considered, only the official story must be correct or the thing is a hoax.)

To avoid misinformation, check out the thread on Metabunk dedicated to this shooting.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

metabunk is a shill site, that was started in order to push the status quo 9/11 narrative. I was banned there twice and many people are banned there for simply posting things that THEY CAN'T debunk. They only go after the low hanging fruit.

Here, watch this, they fake almsot everything, worldwide, it isn't just in the US, but some multinational intelligence unit doing these things, get some popcorn while you are at it. The video creator and investigator has hundreds of other videos, illustrating the fakery and outright conflicting narratives of these events, all intentional by the way:

https://153news.net/files/videos/2018/04/28/1524953561cb5d5-360.mp4

^ ^ ^ Just wait for it to load... THE high profile shootings in the US will always be table-top exercises. Few are real.

[–]CompleteDoubterII 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thank you for the documentary. I watched it a few weeks ago, and found it quite interesting. Some of it I agree with, some of it I disagree with.

Yes, that man filming himself screaming 'Alan' or whatever and supposedly claiming that it was for his family to be able to locate him is extremely suspicious. The hearings of a second bomb is also rather suspicious. The picture(s) and video(s) of the Manchester Arena bombing compared to what was supposedly being claimed are in conflict. I also agree that the woman who lied about bringing victims to some hotel (if I remember it correctly) and not facing any supposed consequences for it is suspicious, as well as the fact that just before the supposed bombings, some of the attendees were denied re-entry back into the Arena, suggesting foreknowledge. Furthermore, the lack of CCTV footage released is suspicious (as it is in all terror acts). If U.K. Critical Thinker is correct in stating that the photo of some man with no background was the only photo released purporting to prove that man is the bomber, then he is correct in being suspicious of that.

I don't believe U.K. Critical Thinker raises a valid point when comparing the times the witnesses gave in interviews to the Manchester Police's narrative. If I remember correctly from the clips in the documentary, there was no central clock in the arena, so to get the time, people would look at their own watches and phones, and different watches and phones display somewhat different times. As such it is not suspicious at all that the witnesses gave different times when interviewed, and it's not suspicious that they're different from the police times. In fact, I would find it very suspicious if they all gave the same time for the same event. Furthermore, with regards to the medical staff not being so panicked when seeing the supposedly horrible scene, I do not believe it raises much grounds for suspicion, as they are supposed to be able to handle seeing people in horrible states. Also, supposed victims smiling when being visited and interviewed can possibly be explained by the comfort they felt by other people consoling them. I don't think anyone without serious psychology and neuroscience knowledge would be able to correctly determine an emotion's cause.

By the way, this may just be me failing at basic research, but I'm having issues finding the Manchester Police's narrative/report on this bombing. I can only ever find the Kerslake Report on it. Would you mind sharing it with me please?

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are a few videos of people, now censored filming the closest hospitals during and well after the event. Many whom called as well. Nobody was taken to the two closest hospitals, even the one with triage.

Also, look up kearnsy74's videos now deleted off YouTube depicting clear evidence that most of the individuals were transported to the Marriott Hotel, not the hospital. This was also the case with the alleged London bridge attack. The latter is actually a case closed anomaly as the hospital was 400 feet away, yet all those who were allegedly injured were transported away from the hospital.

I also posted a recent video on the alleged Boston Bombing and have many videos saved two of which provide the clearest evidence of what I like to call "hyper-active drill participants late for work."

Two eyewitnesses who publicized the raw footage of the alleged Boston Bombing were able to walk through the zone in which the pyrotechnic bomb detonated in a controlled fashion. These two individuals were not part of the drill and were quickly excorted away from the scene after they were spotted by agents. Others were also thrown to the ground by plain clothed individuals who have now after 6 years been exposed as undercover FBI agents, Counter-intelligence agents and oddly, air force personal, naval intelligence personal, and ARMY PSYOP division officers. Now, what are they doing there?

There goal was to clear the event of any non-participants, by any means necessary. Even by forcefully throwing a women to the ground. Luckily, raw footage captured two drill participants late for work.

One rather old lady ran towards the bombing a few minutues after it had exploded. She had no signs of injuries, no blood, and was able to walk to the detonation spot and lay down. She then, with the help of a plain clothed agent applies blood around her face and a weird moulage arm strap.

We are talking about a women who was not even near the bombing at the time, completely uninjured, only to walk to the area of detonation, lay down and apply moulage.

It is clear evidence of fakery.

We also have the 2nd bombing where the pyrotechnic device was placed on a small tree.

Interestingly, the tree experienced ABSOLUTELY NO DAMAGE to the bark. Plastic cups remained in their position despite being 8 feet away from detonation. It is preposterous for this to happen, unless we take into account that this was a hyper-active drill conducted on the American people, with Taxpayer money. Clearly, fakery was involved.

So, it is clear they can fake these events with the use of hyper-active drills.

That is why we will never see non-doctored surveillance footage or the full surveillance footage of any of these questionable events. We only are given the basics and highly staged photos. In fact, agents, at the Boston Bombing were able to set up vicsim participants staged photos as the pyrotechnic device exploded. They quickly went to the scene and directed the particpants. Their job was to obtain the needed propaganda photos for the media. A few Reuter photographers were involved who were interestingly able to capture various other alleged terrorist bombings and alleged mass shootings, AS THEY UNFOLDED. Huh. Always in the right place at the right time, coincidence?

You might want to watch UK's other videos on the alleged Fort Lauderdale and Orlando shooting too. Those are also well done and are far more detailed than the manchester overview documentary.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think anyone without serious psychology and neuroscience knowledge would be able to correctly determine an emotion's cause.

And that is why we must piece together the narrative. Treat every source as it comes in as its own source. We must not twist the injected narratives as evidence of something, rather we carefully investigate all sources as their own. Keep in mind, if in fact what is being conducted is a psychological operation, then we must UNDERSTAND, the use of Perception Management in psychological operations. Why? Because if we were not to, we might go on a trail that leads us to more confusion and conflict, which is exactly what these injected, ambiguous, and especially conflicting narratives and alternative government approved theories entail.

As for the Duping Delight, one either sees it or doesn't. If an unprecedented amount of witnesses and alleged victims are displaying duping delight we must call into question their behavior but we should NOT make it the focal center point in the investigation. Simply, display this behavior for all to see and be done with it.

Instead, we should investogate who these people are, which the media and government have done a wonderful job of hiding the alleged particpants information in sealed police reports and mugshots, or simply a name change/alias, making it quite hard to research VicSims that do not exist in the context of a real person.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As for the manchester police report, you might want to ask UK Critical Thinker that.

[–]CompleteDoubterII 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You had a Metabunk account? What was your username? I'd like to look through some of your postings there.

Can you provide any evidence of them banning people for posting things they can't debunk? In any case, even if Metabunk is a shill site, consider all pieces of information, even if it does come from a highly biased shill. And of course, Metabunk is not the be-all-and-end-all of investigation. (They actually believed Assad gassed his own people.)

I'm not into investigating mass shootings, but I might watch it later on.

[–]CompleteDoubterII 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

By the way, what site do you go to for debunkings and the other side against conspiracy theories, if not Metabunk?

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think that there is deliberately bad reporting on these shootings. That is combined with the fog-of-war. People are using it to push a certain narrative. To push a narrative, they media may even use actors /acting.

That also includes the idea that it is all just faked. And that is in my mind the honey-pot trap, that they build for the people doubting the official story. Because that will place the investigators and media out of the fight. And create a huge conflict between the victims and doubters.

[–]Jesus[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

EDIT: It's no honeypot trap. That's why the inject puff pieces and conflicting narratives, shuch as multiple shooters, etc. It is all fake. A table-Top exercise, no honeypot. Watch any UK Critical Thinker video and you'll see you fake these events really are. They are not real. What they do, is have 25-50 somtiems a hundreds or more participants who have scripted narratives. Either they block off the area where they will be conducting the drill or do it live. They fire blanks into the crowd. Non-participants disperse, leaving only the participants left, they then set up moulage and post some grainy videos for all the population to see.

It is a deliberate, intentional tactic in perception management when conducting PSYOPs termed the ambiguity method, where they inject puff pieces, added conflicting narratives and anomalies that make zero sense. Of course they're able to create these stories because the entire event is scripted, thus researchers go on wild goose chases and try to piece together the conflicting narratives, which gets them nowhere. All purposeful.

If you doubt the media’s complicity, regardless of media personal membership in think tanks groups such as CFR, Biderberg, Trilateral Commission, etc,. ask yourself how we were sold yellow cake from Niger and weapons of mass destruction, or the false Iraq-9/11 lie. Even during the 9/11 event they used the same playbook as Operation Northwoods. In the declassified document it says they would utilize mock victims. VICSIMS would play the parts of the family members of mock victims who died in drones painted to look like passenger jets. They'd blow them up or crash them in a city, which would be blamed on Cuba.

All of it fake and scripted but done in order to socially engineer the population for war. During 9/11, a good book by Elias Davidsson illustrated that the entire passenger list had mock victims or vicsims. Likely the planes were swapped mid-air and replaced with reinforced passenger jet drones, like Operation Northwoods. When we do see the families of the VICSIMS who boarded the phantom planes we notice that they all push the offical story and many conduct interviews stating how we need to increase Military spending and go to war.

Alice Hoagland, who has many aliases was laughing on TV, the day her son allegedly died on the plane.

The document (Operation Northwoods) continues by saying they'd set up mock funerals (keep in mind this was back in the 1960's). Hundreds of people playing the parts of family members who lost loved ones. All scripted and broadcasted on the TV Operation Mockingbird style. Of course Kennedy did not sign this order, which the DoD was furious about.

The Orlando shooting was also a PSYOP, nobody actually died and all the injured who made recoveries in a few hours conducted interviews the same day or the day after, one of whom -- Norman Casiano-- shot four times (two times in the chest, twice in the stomach) was allegedly out of the hospital several hours after he was shot, and conducted News interviews, even stopped by to be interviewed by Anderson "phony fake show" Cooper. He had no visable bullet wounds a week after the incident, because this mugshot criminal on facebook decided to post a Live vidio of him singing with his shirt off. He later deleted the vidio, but clearly he was never shot.

They 100% use actors, and terrible ones at that. EVERY SINGLE Person injured in PULSE, or who was a witness was a criminal with mugshots. A smaller majority had acting IMDB profiles in B-films for Hollywood, but the lot of them were criminals with high bonds.

The media even changed their names, added letters, or outright lied about who they were so people like me and other researchers would be unable to figure out who they were. Of course, we did, and discovered the majority of them were criminals. They robbed banks, sexual assault charges, domestic abuse charges, many, many felonies, and yet here they were paraded on TV as heros to a PSYOP event.

I also should note, a few of the injured also had family members who worked for corporate news networks.

These criminals then SET UP GoFraudMe accounts and garner hundreds of thousands of dollars, I kid you not. They have zero shame.

The media is running full steam ahead with a patently false narrative on so called gun violence in America. The corporate leftist media pundits lead a deliberate propaganda and social engineering campaign on gun control, whilst right leaning corporate news network pundits advocate for mental hygiene/baker act laws after these fake shootings, increased surveillance, increased gun sales through the medium of fear, and school security contracts by the defense industry; a profitable niche market. Ultimately, after the passing of the Smith Mundt Modernization act of 2012, we are able to observe a mathematically impossible frequency in annual high-profile mass shootings. A year difference can not account for this dramatic shift.

From 1994 – 2012 gun violence has decreased 53% and the gun murder rate, 47% . This explains why they have avoided the obvious FBI Uniform Crime Report facts and refuse to tell the real story of gun crime in the US, that it is going down, for the fifth straight year in a row. Gun sales are increasing at an unprecedented rate, yet gun crime is going down. Where gun violence is most common is in poorly educated, impoverished metropolitan areas, particularly in the African American communities with a population of greater than 100,000. Drug violence also plays a major role in these statistics.

Who introduced the Smith Mundt Modernization Act of 2012? U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry, a Council on Foreign Relations member. Membership was listed as of May 23, 2012, the very year when the Smith Mundt Modernization Act was written into the National Defense Authorization Act and later passed by the Obama administration.

Available at archives. http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html?letter=T

With the passing of the Smith Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 there is little preventing the State Department and the BBG from widely disseminating unattributed government-produced programming within the United States. The danger of domestic dissemination not only lies in the dissemination itself, but also lies in anonymous dissemination. To curb the potential harm of covert government propaganda, there must be either legislation or a judicial doctrine that requires the State Department and the BBG to attribute their materials.

Advocates of the legislation such as Gregory L. Garland for example wrote that the 1948 provision banning domestic dissemination deprives the United States in a communication age with no frontiers the U.S. of its "most powerful tool of soft power: our ideals.”

In short, any unnamed official who was concerned about the 2012 law version stated:

"It removes the protection for Americans. It removes oversight from the people who want to put out this information. There are no checks and balances. No one knows if the information is accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false."

The abrogation of the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948; in its place a modernized form ridding of any sort of checks and balances, effectively legalizes domestic propaganda on an unprecedented scale. The aforesaid increase in publicized narrative driven high-profile mass shootings at a mathematically impossible frequency since the passing of the legislation is circumstantial evidence of exercises or drills being presented as authentic, real shootings, irrespective of the many anomalies. It thusly, manufactures consent for multiple agendas, covert and overt.

Put differently, what our government is doing is completely legal and sanctioned. Yet people still believe that all of these high-profile mass shootings are actual, legitimate events. Despite all of the egregious anomalies, impossibilities, inconsistencies, lack of any legitimate evidence, victims with gunshot wounds released from the hospital within hours, with no visible injuries, such as the Santa Fe witness shot through the brain or the Orlando Shooting witness who was shot four times in the chest and stomach but was released from the hospital that very day, conducting interviews on CNN 12 hours after the fact. That doesn’t even take it account the fact that almost all the witnesses and injured during the Orlando shooting acted in various B-films prior to the event or had multiple mugshots with high bonds. How and why people cannot discern truth from fiction is mind boggling.

Especially when, the legislation and executive orders outlining exactly how and why and by whom these staged events are being conducted by is readily available if only one is willing to look for it. Critical thinking is dead. People believe any and everything they see on television and accept it regardless of all the anomalies, conflicting narratives and lack of evidence or reason, motive behind it. There's no need to research, and if they decide to they will just believe the title of some faux-alternative source, such as cointelpro agent Alex Jones.

I candidly believe that they intentionally make these events beyond obviously staged, just to see how badly they can botch these carbon copy narratives, recycling the same witness stories over and over again, yet still convince the vast majority of Americans that they are real. These events are designed tomanufacture consent for their agendas, and manipulate people into responding and reacting to exactly what they want us to do. They're emotionally abusing us, brainwashing us and duping us all into voluntarily surrendering our last few rights and freedoms until we have nothing left. This is so much bigger than just gun control. This is about red flag laws which establish a precedent for dismantling and decimating our constitutional rights without due process.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What are the chances that all the injured persons and witnesses at the PULSE night club shooting were either b-film Hollywood actors, or mugshot criminals with high bonds? The shooter even an actor who starred in a Hollywood documentary.

Is it all just a coincidence? The media wouldn't be involved right? They just happened to interview all these criminals and ask them scripted questions, most of whom display duping delight.

Of course you never SEEEEEE anyone dead. You see a lot of acting, some better than others, maybe they'll show a few people lying down with moulage and the fakest blood I've ever seen, of course the amount injured and dead never amounts to the number lying on the crowd with fake blood and moulage, nowhere close. But that's all the american public needs. Is a grainy vidio or a grainy picture.

Actually, the American public doesn't even need anything. They just need to hear it from the media, that's it.

Of course I'm not denyig that private contractors and our government doesn't murder people for their own agenda, but because of the legalization of PSYOPs, it makes it much easier and safer to conduct exercises instead.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Perception Management

Any presidential policy may be accompanied by broadcasts that use subliminal programming as part of perception management. These mechanisms that squelch dissent have been used since the Reagan Administration, particularly under a neo-conservative controlled Department of Defense to shape public opinion to support administrative policies. Wars require domestic support and these “black ops” programs started to use the psychological operation tools of the military. DARPA, the research and development arm of the military, has created many tools to control the enemy through media that shapes public perception. The only question left was the issue of what the goal of the president (or the real powers behind him—the Council on Foreign Relations) might be, besides the obvious one of having few people who disagree with status quo policy directives. Psychological false flag operations were and still are used to create conscious and “unconscious” support for the aforesaid agendas stated above. The use of staged events, or exercises propagandized as real is beneficial for the participants and government and private contractors involved. They are able to control the situation far better than if it were a real, chaotic event. They prepare for it, sometimes years in advance. The non-event deters the filing of real lawsuits and participants sign non-disclosure, confidential agreements, and national security clauses, erstwhile, community gag-orders are ordered if a municipality is involved. All participants benefit from the non-event. All covert and overt agendas, are achieved and long-term narratives using willing participants can be propagandized in the future.
These “False realities” are staged actions and deceptive events. They are designed to assault the emotions and control the minds of those who react to them. False reality events, such as the various high-profile mass shootings, including many international ‘terrorist attacks’ such as the Brussels bombing are contrived, engineered and implemented as repeat deception practices of corrupt governments, world-wide. Especially note that government sponsored, law enforcement and media, enabled, false realities take place as real (genuine) events, they then use the perception management of schema to ingrain false realities into your consciousness. False realities are engineered and implemented to appeal to the emotions. Once a government contrived propaganda and/or violent event is embedded within the sub-conscience, it is difficult for a person to recognize genuine reality.

13 Basic Strategies of Perception Management: Counterpart – Utilized in PSYOPs, and False Flags

El Paso fake shooting and the Gilroy fake shooting checks off all of these tactics if you take the time to research the people involved and the narratives.

EL PASO's specific agenda:

https://saidit.net/media/TxUMpIBGqoQ5xM-1Fp8xutdi-lUKJknLVwTzHhhvfGA.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBF4gWkWwAAZBbs.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBF4gWYWkAAKewy.jpg JPG

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBF4gXBXkAEYh5B.jpg JPG

EL PASO

(1) Ambiguity

If ambiguity increases, the perceiver finds it harder to form an accurate perception.

Counterpart: Eyewitnesses have intentional conflicting accounts.

(2) Social status

Targeting a person’s position in society or in an organization.

Counterpart: The official narrative has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for the governing body.

(3) Impression management

The perceptions or impressions of others.

Counterpart: The narrative behind the attack serves to leverage emotions like fear, as well as false patriotism, in order to manufacture consent around a previously controversial issue such as gun-control, or Baker Act Laws.

(4) Preparation

Having clear goals and knowing the ideal position you want people to hold.

Counterpart: Military and law enforcement training drills occur on the same day or a few weeks ahead of time very close by causing confusion to obscure eye-witness testimony and allow orchestrator's to plant both patsies, disinformation and backup operatives. Immediate calls for gun control or restricting civil liberties.

(5) Credibility

All information uses prejudices or expectations to increase credibility.

Counterpart: News agencies publicize that they are “being given reports” or “being told” and do not cite who reported or told them the unconfirmed information they broadcast as real. This is legalized extensively in the Smith Mundt Modernization Act of 2012.

(6) Multi-channel support

Have multiple arguments and fabricated facts to reinforce your information.

Counterpart: No obvious motive for the mass attack and no prior indicators. Shooter leaves manifesto or lots of evidence “proving” they were “radicalized” or “on drugs” or other undesirables.

(7) Centralized control

Employ entities to promote propaganda.

Counterpart: Fake “victims” w/ multiple aliases and crisis actors w/ high bonds, or criminal activity such as sexual assault or bank robbery in order to control the narrative with blackmail.

(8) Security

The nature of the deception campaign is known by few.

Counterpart: All drill participants and crisis actors sign Non-disclosure Agreements with “National Security” clause promising swift and severe punishment if broken. Everyone involved is on a “need to know” basis and kept in the dark about the overall intent of the event. Paid huge sums of money, through gofundme accounts and other private entity contributions. Gag orders are placed on entire towns.

(9) Flexibility

The deception campaign adapts and changes over time as needs change.

Counterpart: Evidence gets destroyed or tampered with and the details do not matter because the culprits are dead or never heard from or seem again. No more interest in an investigation. All contrary information memory-holed.

(10) Coordination

Organize in a hierarchy to maintain consistent distribution of information.

Counterpart: The federal agencies trump the local law enforcement agencies due to the “National Security” element of the drill which is ultimately controlled by the Department of Defense.

(11) Concealment

Contradicting information is destroyed.

Counterpart: Culprit is dead, or disappears from public realm and evidence disappears from news reports, Internet, and media. Patsy has no military training, yet shoots extremely fast and accurately with a high kill ratio but no authority looks at the evidence.

(12) Untruthful statements

Fabricate the truth.

Counterpart: Families of “victims” have acting backgrounds and receive payoffs in gofundme accounts and direct payoffs, especially mortgages. They often show little to no emotion, and even smile or laugh (duping delight). The lie perpetuates and the “official story” is shaped by the media into truth.

(13) Schema

Organization and interpretation of information based on past experiences and knowledge.

Counterpart: Reinforce past psychological operations with the same agenda.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't even know what to believe anymore with this stuff. The whole "this is fake" narrative could be fake too. Just being honest, because we don't really know.

What is obvious is that this is pushing us in a direction that benefits the military-industrial complex, and the agencies that run it. Beyond that, it is hard to know for sure one way or the other about any of it, imo. It's just he-said vs she-said, a maelstrom of narratives.

But if we follow the money, and we ask who benefits, it begins to paint a picture. But beyond that it is hard to see the details in any truth, and I find this incredibly frustrating. It makes me feel like we live in a picturebook made-up world where the media literally creates reality in the mind of the people who eat it up. I find this feeling frustrating, while at the same time knowing that feeling itself is deliberate. That's how I'm supposed to feel about all this.

Part of me just wants to not pay any of this any attention, if there's no truth to be found. Imagine if there were mass shootings and no one changed how they thought or acted... how could that be used to manipulate the masses if no one reacted to it? We have a very emotionally-reactive culture and we see it as a skill instead of a problem, and it makes the populace easy to lead by the emotions, easy to goad in to certain reactions and thus fall in to predictable patterns of thinking and behavior.

I feel like life is too short for mind-games like this that other people throw our way to try and control us. I am sad people died, but this event changes nothing. The millions of people who hyper-react to these events, and use them to demonize a race or religion, will end up causing much more problems though. This is how wars start, and I don't think the people hyper-reacting realize what their reactions are bringing upon the world. Rather than dampen the cycle of suffering, they intend to amplify it, out of spite and anger and frustration and fear.

It's sad people can't see the larger picture and cease being so reactive in ways that make them fall straight in to a war mentality as planned by the military-industrial complex. The mentality is required for the war to happen. And the economic and media conditions cultivate the mentality.

There are tens of trillions of dollars at stake. This is not a game.

Sometimes I just want to go live in a forest in some random country no one cares about... this stuff is infuriating to deal with, and I'm sure hundreds of millions of Americans feel similarly, but just don't know how to voice that frustration and instead it lands on easy scapegoats based on race and religion. Then one mass of humanity deeply hates another mass, and vice-versa, that's the fuel for war. Then the military-industrial complex can just trigger it, and then the war happens.

I want to resist war. I see no greater goal. It's not too late, people are waking up. Not all will, but hopefully enough can so that things don't get so bad at their worst.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They have the legislation in place to fake these events, not that they didn't do it before, but they now face zero legal repercussions to conduct such events. It is much easier for them to fake them, and they have entire private crisis management contractors to do just that; script and control the various narratives. Plus, no deaths, no lawsuits and everyone, except for the taxpayers and those not in the know benefit from the exercise. As for the El Paso shooting drill, the agenda had a lot to do with this:

https://saidit.net/media/TxUMpIBGqoQ5xM-1Fp8xutdi-lUKJknLVwTzHhhvfGA.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBF4gWkWwAAZBbs.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBF4gWYWkAAKewy.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBF4gXBXkAEYh5B.jpg

If you spend no more than an hour a day for one week researching just one high-profile mass shooting as it occurs (because they memory-hole information), downloading all the interviews of the various criminals and actors involved, you'll start to see how fake and phony these table-top exercises are. Their anomalies and conflicting narratives are so dumb, that you'll be unable to make any sense of anything. Take the media pieces as they are said, and try to fit everything together, you can't. it it makes zero sense, absolutely nothing flows, narratives conflict and are unworkable. That is regardless of the participants being criminals with high bonds and b-film actors/actresses. Why, inject conflicting information? Because it is intentional, they need to inject conflicting narratives, albeit, hilarious drama to confuse people, especially those who take the time to research the events. It is a deliberate tactic.

They don't even try half the time, though. Some events hold water better than others, but ALL of them use the DoD tactics of perception management. They are theatrical hyper-active drills, if they want a full show, they'll use moulage.

These exercises passed off as real are not only conducted in the US but worldwide. Who is to blame? Usually private defense and security contractors, such as show-sec, law enforcement, DHS and their international entities, Cadmus, Obsidan, and especially G4S, who, with help from various other private security contractors, faked the Brussels bombings, which they did a swell job at it, except for the fact that someone filmed the whole thing on the 12th story of a building. They were setting up the event near the subway where 50+ people were rubbing blood and strapping moulage on the Vicsims. Many people say, it is the anti-gun lobby staging these events, but you'll start to observe that those behind it are no such thing. Though, the anti-gun lobby does benefit from these events, so too does the security and defense contractors, as well as intelligence agencies.

I don't even know what to believe anymore. The whole "this is fake" narrative could be fake too. Just being honest, because we don't really know.

What is obvious is that this is pushing us in a direction that benefits the military-industrial complex, and the agencies that run it. Beyond that, it is hard to know for sure one way or the other about any of it, imo. It's just he-said vs she-said, a maelstrom of narratives.

Take the time to watch UK Critical Thinkers videos, just type his name in duckduckgo search or Qwant, not GOOGLE.

PLEASE, watch his videos. ‘On the Face of it’ is a basic documentary that he made concerning the Manchester bombing, which looks very real, but was a hyper active exercise. Do you remember me showing you a few pictures of a body with moulage. Most people thought it was real. Users actually told me to delete the post and yet, it was realistic moulage but fake nonetheless. This is why even showing a few grainy pictures of alleged dead people lying down, is not enough for me to say it is real. We have to judge each piece of evidence by itself, whether it come from a witness, the media, the government, etc. That is something almost nobody does.

Anyway, UK Critical Thinker details all the narratives and tries to take the official narratives and piece everything together. He has many other videos in more detail on Manchester and various other international events. One such event was the Fort Lauderdale shooting. A fake shooting with crisis actors involved, two of whom would later be interviewed during the Parkland drill, one of those persons son had multiple best friends die during the Parkland event. Of course he displayed duping delight in the interview and didn’t seem distraught at all.

(Also, if you research how many people were affected, or injured in various worldwide drills only to be injured or killed in others, you’ll laugh. I have saved locally 50+ people many of whom were injured in various bombings and shootings all around the world. Then you have the fact that AP and Reuters photographers and journalists are ALREADY AT the events as they occur, taken pictures and videos. They then just so happen to show up at various other worldwide events as they occur. They know nobody cares to research this and even if a hundred or so people research, and expose this, it doesn’t really matter to them.)

UK exposes all of these mass shootings and terrorist attacks. Make a bag of non-gmo popcorn and watch his many videos. He and a few other researchers are the only ones I'd ever show asleep people. Most of the conspiracy crowd that promote the hoax narrative are shills, mixing the reality of table-top exercises with the falsity of flat earth and the Mandela effect, a deliberate tactic to discredit.

Another thing I find hilarious, is in many recent high-profile shootings they have a fluff piece built into the narrative about a hoax, related or unrelated with the shooting. This is to provide the psyop with credibility. It also serves to cover up videos exposing the drill. The search engines will then be flooded with their hoax injected fluff piece drama.

It makes me feel like we live in a picturebook made-up world where the media literally creates reality in the mind of the people who eat it up. I find this feeling frustrating, while at the same time knowing that feeling itself is deliberate. That's how I'm supposed to feel about all this.

Well, that’s only if you believe the media’s narrative, which is merely the governments and it’s private contractors script. They actually, make these shooting as fake as possible just to see how dumb the masses are. They even add in hilarious stories for researchers to discover. Such as “ANGEL” “COLON”, a criminal with multiple mugshots, who was allegedly shot at the gay night club named PULSE, later to be worked on by Dr. “LUBE”.

Part of me just wants to not pay any of this any attention, if there's no truth to be found. Imagine if there were mass shootings and no one changed how they thought or acted... how could that be used to manipulate the masses if no one reacted to it? We have a very emotionally-reactive culture and we see it as a skill instead of a problem, and it makes the populace easy to lead by the emotions, easy to goad in to certain reactions and thus fall in to predictable patterns of thinking and behavior.

I don’t blame you. Many researchers who exposed various shootings and events in the earlier years, have started to disappear, mostly due to censorship. Know that they do not like people researching these events and try to censor each and everyone of them.

People say who cares? Well, we should care because they are socially engineering entire populations. Falsifying history. Creating fake events to be written in future so called educational books. Not everyone is cut out to research said events. Back in the day I went so far as to call the various actors, such as Norman Casiano. Shot four times at PULSE, allegedly released from hospital the same day as the shooting. Did CNN interview shortly after. This traitor even told a researcher on the phone a week later that he was shot 6 times. A few days later he does a Facebook live video singing with his shirt off. He had zero wounds, and yet he was supposedly shot in the chest and stomach. How stupid can people be?

I feel like life is too short for mind-games like this that other people throw our way to try and control us.

That’s understandable. But you have to first become aware of these events and their agendas. The first step is seeing for what these shootings are, hyperactive exercises featuring criminals. The next step is understanding why they conduct them; what is the covert agenda? The third step is trying to live as best as you can and try your hardest to live a sustainable life without the need for the systems assistance.

I am sad people died, but this event changes nothing.

I don’t know if anyone died. But I’ll have to research further on this shooting. Though I posted why they conducted this event above. And the various other high-profile shootings this year were all fake.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks. I agree it is possible, I am still not fully convinced that it's the definite truth and probably never will be tbh. Some of these shootings ARE real, and they just use them as convenient excuses to accomplish political goals. "Never let a crisis go to waste" doesn't mean they're creating every crisis though. Real crises can have conflicting narratives and people who act weirdly on camera. I don't know. I'll agree some percentage may be faked by those agencies looking for a budget increase, but I'm not sure what percentage that is. I'm pretty sure it's not 100% though. But it's probably also not 0%.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like I said watch UK Critical Thinkers videos, I think you'll see these events much differently. You'll learn a lot and you'll be able to see through future events, if they are exercises.

Some of these shootings ARE real

Not many high profile shootings with mass casualties, from 2012 to present, most of them are table-top exercises, sometimes full-community, with gag orders on the town. They now have the legal authority to conduct them.

Real crises can have conflicting narratives and people who act weirdly on camera.

That's true.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The millions of people who hyper-react to these events, and use them to demonize a race or religion, will end up causing much more problems though. This is how wars start, and I don't think the people hyper-reacting realize what their reactions are bringing upon the world. Rather than dampen the cycle of suffering, they intend to amplify it, out of spite and anger and frustration and fear.

I agree, that is why the alleged shooters allegedly write manifestos expressing their hate for another race, a group of people. This also serves to heighten unity for the powers that be. These events, thankfully for the most part are fake. But false flag atrocity events, such as 9/11 serve the same purpose. To heighten unity in a time of atrocity. That unity then serves to push an agenda, an agenda that most people would never advocate for on principles alone.

It's sad people can't see the larger picture and cease being so reactive in ways that make them fall straight in to a war mentality as planned by the military-industrial complex. The mentality is required for the war to happen. And the economic and media conditions cultivate the mentality.

I agree, but domestically they socially engineer populations to willingly advocate for their rights to be taken away. 9/11 served the domestic policies of surveillance and legislature such as the Patriot Act and foreign policy agendas such as the neoconservative balkanization of the middle east.

There are tens of trillions of dollars at stake. This is not a game.

It sort of is to them.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

SS: About halfway through this article is the following:

'I heard the shots but I thought they were hits, like roof construction,' said Adriana Quezada, 39, who was in Walmart with in the women’s clothing section with her two children.

She said she saw four men, dressed in black, wearing shirts, moved together firing guns indiscriminately.

'I saw four men, shooting everywhere,' Quezada said.

'I told my son, those are gunshots.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7317905/El-Paso-police-say-theres-active-shooter-local-mall.html

Now researchers will go on a goose chase, when in reality the entire shooting was fake with willing participants. So, why put these stories out there? It is a perception management method utilized in PSYOP's called Ambiguity method

If ambiguity increases, the perceiver finds it harder to form an accurate perception.

*Counterpart: * Eyewitnesses have many conflicting accounts.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like they are going to release any footage. They will just leave a statement on what they saw on this footage..

It's all fake.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The police and FBI are investigating whether an anonymous white nationalist "manifesto", shared on an online forum, was written by the gunman. The document says the attack was targeted at the local Hispanic community.

Just watched multiple News channels, both said:

Ithink social media is at the root of these shootings.

[–]Vigte 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd say "don't give them ideas" but let's face it...