all 13 comments

[–]EndlessSunflowers 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

It's almost as if they've polluted the whole system so much that when someone stands up to honestly and repeatedly say "we need to end the regime-change wars" people use politico to support the theory that they're just being trolled - if someone wouldn't do everything that you would do, the way that you would do it - does that make them your enemy

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She didn't stamd up for crap. She's a CFR member, pro-AIPAC, and clfaux anti-establishment. It's theater. She isn't Putin's puppet, she's a Cfr controlled opposition plant. Many of the controlled opposition alternative news losers were former cfr members.

Her bill to stop arming terrorists in Syria was a political ploy. She knew it wouldn't pass, it was only done to make her look anti-establishment. Hence, why she was paraded on CNN to state that the US is arming terrorists. CNN would mever do this unless she is controlled opposition.

[–]EndlessSunflowers 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What a nonsense article / tweet/ point they're trying to make - that google should be allowed to manipulate people - is that where you're at?!? WTF, take a look at the comments on that tweet about her being putin's bitch or whatever LOL some folks are easily confused

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is nonsense. That's the point. Gabbard is a plant. Not a Putin plant but a status quo plant acting like she isn't anti-establishment. Sort of like what Trump did during his election. God, I'll post a whole expose on this liar soon. They need to give you your heros.

[–]Neptunes_Driver 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

For all of the many times I have seen people slag on the Counsel on Foreign Relations on-line, I still do not see the issue with them. They are a bunch of academics sitting around talking policy and such. I've listened to "The World Next Week" from the CFR as a podcast for years and other that political stances I have often disagreed with, I don't see the nefarious behaviour that seems to scare people so much. What am I missing? Why is there so much conspiracy around the CFR? What power do they hold as an organization?

I also listen to the Federalist Society, for the same reason. Are they too the new illuminati or is there something specific about the CFR?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Someone has been hypnotized by the propaganda.

[–]Neptunes_Driver 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

What is the propaganda pushing? What is their endgame? That was the whole point of the question. What nefarious shit are they up to?

A wise man can entertain a thought without adopting it.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's funny.

A wiser man can look at your account history and draw attention to the fact that you've only had this username for 18 hours as of 17:55:14 UTC Friday, August 2, 2019 (Zulu time).

Tell me "wise man" did you create this "Neptune_Driver" throwaway because you're a comedian, cause your CFR story is a absurd joke.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

He's probably a shill. Anytime I post posts about Tulsi, espeically on reddit, or anything about AIPAC, Hasbara shills with either brand new accounts or accounts in which they have not posted anything in years, shill for AIPAC and any other status quo agenda. It's pretty obvious.

[–]Neptunes_Driver 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually you are both very wrong. I came up with Neptunes_Driver because I served in submarines, and it felt like all I did was drive the fucking boat. It's also my current on what's left of reddit.

Of all of the douchenozzles on stage at the DNC debates recently, Tulsi was the only one that didn't make my skin crawl.

Back to the point, if you want to claim I am "hypnotized by the propaganda" at least fucking identify the propaganda. Which was my original question.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's controlled opposition theater. They play both sides and every side in between.

[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Who is a better option? Not that that is a reason to elect someone but don't you think someone who is in politics is going to part of some groups? I see you post a lot about her being a plant but I don't see that you recommend any type of replacement or even a name of another person who would be a good president.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Holy fuck! You may be right..

This should be handled as a antitrust issue for Congress.

Instead, this could turn into the inverse of the Alex Jones backdoor strategy.