Statistical analysis concluded the odds of 20 such elderly mothers is 62, 482, 742, 574, 637, 216, 553 to one (that’s 62 quintillion to one), and it is 812 million times more likely that the alleged victims were born in 1996 rather than 2006 (the “official” story).

The photos used were likely from 2006 of the children and not 2012.

In statistics, we can combine odds of two separate events. This can quickly get complicated, and combines art with science. In the approximation of odds of alleged mothers’ ages combined with chemtrails occurring only once during 5840 satellite photos, perhaps an easier analogy will help:

Imagine a person driving to work and home along the same route five days a week, 50 weeks a year for 11 years (to approximate 5840 chances). On only one morning after these 11 years, government officials re-route traffic, and with no apparent reason to do so. The person is redirected into a construction zone (not away), where an alleged accident of astronomical odds kills the person. For illustration, the “official story” is a combination of mechanical failure and human error: a demolition wrecking ball is placed directly over the driver while he is stopped by officials, dropped, and crushed the person.

Is there a connection between the officials ordering the traffic re-route and the troubled official explanation of an “accident”?

One would have to ask, and answer that apparently there is. In our analogy:

• Who ordered traffic to be re-routed when there was no apparent purpose?

• What was the purpose of the re-route?

The sheer improbability of the one morning among ~5500 of a usual commute being exactly the one morning of an impossible “accident” requiring violations of let’s say a dozen safety protocols must be investigated by any rational person wanting the facts. Let’s look at our combination of chemtrails and alleged mothers’ ages:

• Who ordered the non-commercial flights to spray what chemicals over Sandy Hook on the morning of December 14, 2012?

• Who approved these multiple flights spraying those chemicals? What was the purpose of the spraying?

The sheer improbability of the one morning among ~5840 of chemical spraying obscuring satellite photos providing helpful data to explain the facts of an apparently impossible “mass shooting” requiring violations of let’s say a dozen response protocols must be investigated by any rational person wanting the facts.

These are just a few anomalies of thousands concerning Sandy Hook. Too bad they censored everything. One thing the media and government doesn't want anyone knowing about is psyops and fakery.

They want you to believe everything on the news is real, or real with bias.