you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mitutoyo 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Dude you are correct, and it's good your leaving a good response for everyone to read but sadly you will almost never change the mind of a conspiracy theorist. They are far to invested to take a step back. It all makes too much sense to them at this point. Keep it up dude

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The "conspiracy theorist" ad hominem attack is intellectually soft.

Are you an "evidence theorist" or a "coincidence theorist"?

Are you the type of person who believes everything that they read?
Your comment suggests that you are.

[–]IamRedBeard 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm not trying to change his mind, really. This guy - well he is just to dug in. But I cant let some crap like that just go unchallenged.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I get it bud.

Unfortunately, this was a hoax. That is the truth. Please see my comment (and link to a radio show) about the ongoing defamation case.

Mind will be blown.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll send you the info and SWIR data. I don't even believe in the chemtrail narrative that bad people are spraying us for ulterior agendas. If these were depicted on thr swir data as contrails and flight patterns indeed followed them, then I would conclude they're contrails but none of that is true.