According to the Jewish Encyclopedia 1906, the Rothschilds are considered the guardians of the papal treasure.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from jewishencyclopedia.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Interesting. Though, the House of Rothschild is a powerful banking dynasty. It should be noted that none of the major world banking institutions are owned by truly religious Orthodox Jews who believe in God and renounce materialism and the so called pagan, gentile world for a spiritual, eternal relationship with God. Of course many of the Orthodox sects are filled with enthno-nationalist ideologies, Zionism (only a 200 year old phenomenon), supremacy and racist views. However, a majority of these Orthodox sects also have conflicting ideologies, some of whoch are sternly against the enthnostate and Zionism.

So, people like Paul Wolfowitz (a new neoconservative, neotrotskyite) who was president of the World Bank is a Jew. Not an Orthodox Jew but an apostate Jew by Orthodox standards, an atheistic Jew of Khazar origin.

Many of the banking elites who are Jews (the largest majorty observable in US commercial banking) are not practicing Jews. They are staunchly atheist and Zionist. What thr Orthodox Jews would consider apostates.

But internationally, many of the banks owners are Catholics, Jesuits and gentiles with varying faiths.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For Jews, religion is only and always simply an excuse, one more arrow in their quiver. Don't put too much stock into who is an apostate and how is "actually" religious. Remember, with Jews, what they say is more often a lie than not, usually in an unexpected manner. For example, one might say, "I don't practice Judaism" while in fact they practice Talmudic Satanism. And then as a backup question, "are you religious?" they might reply yes or no depending on which lie serves them best, because at this point either answer is a lie. In the end, the degeneracy of the Jew is truly inscrutable.

Also, the huge influence of Jews over Christianity and Catholicism means that the New Testament has been modified to THEIR liking. The Old Testament, with its abominable incitation to violence, does not belong in the same book at all. The fact that it is, demonstrates a purely Jewish influence in attempting to display origins of Christianity as being theirs. The foremost cultural appropriators are Jews.

Christian faith is as anti-Jewish as anything ever. In fact, if you learn the story of Horus, which dates from about 12,000 years ago, you will see that it is essentially the same story. Isn't it an interesting "coincidence" that "Jesus" comes 10,000 years later, a long while after the Jews escape Egypt, and this "Jesus" happens to be Jewish, while in fact, his father was certainly no Jew, and his mother was only a "Jew" because she lived in a land where the LAW was Jewish. But the Galilee was by then only recently populated by immigrants from, er, the nation to the Northeast of that IIRC. Those were not Jews.

But no, they had to "make" Jesus a Jew, but he was as much so as those black African "refugees" in Sweden are "Swedish". His supposed Jewishness is one of the many made up lies by those same peopleoids.

In the end it doesn't really matter if it was "Jesus" from 2,000 years ago or "Horus" from 12,000 years ago who said "Love thy fellow man" and many other hugely beneficial recommendations. These are what matters, not the first name of the dude nor his alleged ethnic origins. His origin is ultimately cosmic and divine in nature, and that should be good enough for anybody.