Yes, the entire war on terror was concocted by the Think Tank Document "A Clean Break" by ISAPS, an Israeli geopolitical policy THink Tank, which woudl then foster into PNAC by the same Dual-Israeli NEOCONS. The interesting thing right now is that Trump is pretending to be antiwar, when he is a hard-line pro Likud party ZIonist, who has appointed neocons around him. I think it is laughable when people tell me that if he fired Bolton Trump would be able to end the wars. Trump is a master at deception. He claims NYtimes is fake news, and for the most part it is. They pushes the war in Syria and Libya but they seem dubious on Iran, possibly because their could be serious blowback if we send ground troops in. The New York Times released a document illustrating the Trump admins war plans for Iran. Trump then in an interview says the new york times is fake news at the very same time the document was released but claims 120,000 troops near Iran and stationed in the middle east, is not enough. "We need a hell of a lot more" he says, if we want to go to war with Iran.

9/11 is sort of smoldering in the background. Today, people are not foolish enough to believe that we must go to war against Iran. The War on Terror is at the end of its life.

Unfortunately, with all the corporate pullouts of personal in Iraq and near Iran such as exxon oil fields, it seems that a so called "New Pearl Harbor" is in the future.

---

Russia has a very small influence on the US domestically, but geopolitically, it fronts a multilateral order that is counter but most likely theatrical to the IMF's SDR goal. Israel is just using our military at this point and is in bed with Russia, and China. The goal has always been to collapse the US dollar and build the new modernized silk road and a multilateral economic order.

However, I think neither country is prepared to put its economy in the hands of an invisible cabal of bankers with their foreign reserves held by their debtors and subject to instant seizure any more.

None of the existing structures are fit for purpose and it is this that makes the SDR’s completely inappropriate, whatever else happens the new world order will be created out of a whole cloth IF Russia and China are not completely subjugated in the meantime.

Countries are controlled by their central banks because the central banks control the money supply. All of the major central banks belong to the Bank of International Settlements. They are working not against each other but in cooperation in a grand Hegelian dialectic.

This is why I menion that the SDR counter agenda against the BRIC's alliance is theatrical. There is no reason the BRICS bank and the western-led IMF cannot run parallel for awhile until a crisis forces a consolidation up the pyramid at which point the western sovereign debt will be restructured through the IMF’s SDRM. Though perhaps this restructuring comes sooner rather than later. Each country will retain it’s own commodity-backed currency but those commodities will be priced in SDR. The recent moves by Russia and China is evidence of this scripted process moving forward.

So, from my current knowledge of what the globalists have planned, they seem to be aiming for an “Enhanced China Model” for the global economy. In China, the central government dictates the direction of the economy, but that direction is pursued with a capitalistic approach. The BRICS move towards a partial gold standard goes beyond their own national currencies, though. To “save the international financial system from cataclysm,” they will also offer a portion of their gold reserves to back the IMF’s SDR, and they will receive a large allotment of SDRs in return. This “gold for SDRs” strategy was hinted at in a (UK) Royal Institute of International Affairs paper titled Adding Gold into the Valuation of the SDR.

So, according to the globalist script, in return for “saving the IMF and the international financial system” with their gold, the BRICS (particularly China) will demand sweeping governance reforms of the IMF and the rest of the UN Complex, as well as a Chinese IMF head. The Chinese would then “own” the New World Order system in the way that George Soros described back in 2009.