you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Well yeah, look: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjAJh7oXtiY

There was a better video of that (or another similar) explosion that showed the radiation effect on the camera much better.

But yeah, nukes in Yemen of all places. I mean, those people have nothing, so let's nuke them. Because.

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thanks.
But it looks like a Fuel air bomb.
Very nasty.
Atomic bomb explodes much faster than speed of air.
Neutron bomb does not even cause explosion, just radiation.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I never said it was a neutron bomb. You clearly know very little about the topic, since you don't recognize the obvious nuclear aspect of this explosion. This is definitely not a fuel air bomb.

Also, if you think you know how all the CURRENT designs of nukes detonate and what they look like, it means you are the world's dumbest spy, you know all the deepest secrets of all the nuclear powers on Earth and you talk from the point of view of that ultra-classified knowledge.

No, you just don't know what you are talking about and are thinking about nukes from the 1950s. Take it from somebody who CAN recognize a nuclear explosion. That's a nuke. Look for other videos, there's at least one that gives a better view. Do some research, don't take my word for it.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You clearly know very little about the topic..

Personal attacks are not allowed on this forum.

Anyway. I disagree with all your points.
It was a JDAM Bomb:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1OqbwtIPy4

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL so you are posting a video of a jdam bomb that is utterly, completely and infinitely different from what I am talking about. That's only proof that you are posting completely unrelated things.

Well done. And it wasn't a personal attack, it was a simple statement of fact. Not everyone knows a lot about nukes, and the "info" about the 1960s style of nukes are not valid anymore. There has been huge advancement since then.

Still not a nuke? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaolZLwrG6M