I do not mean to be a nuisance but a 'holocaust' is certainly a flawed term. It is defined as a sacrifice or death consumed by fire. Hence, why the ovens hoax was invented by the Soviets and the allies. Of course because of political correctness the definition has changed to include genocide of Jewry and many other things but in reality it shouldn't be called a Holocasut because there was no mass extermination by fire or sacrafice by fire.

Now, a Holocaust could, thus include the Bristish terror bombing of entire German cities including German labor camps. Or it could include the nuclear bombings of Japan that incinerated, innocent people by an exploision of fire.

You should explore the book, written by a so called self-hating Jew (coined by ZIonists):

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00G2DO7XA/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_taft_p1_i0

'The Holocaust Industry' by Norman Finkelstein. And watch this documentary on the lies told today about Zionists regarding the Holocaust in order to continue thier onslaught on the Palestinians and anyone else they deem enemies.

http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/ProbingTheHolocaust-Part1-HB25.mp4

^ ^ ^ Just watch it with an objective mind. You'll notice that many events were invented well after the war, including atrocity propaganda. For example, the Holocaust industry has effectively barred anyone from questioning any story about the so called holocaust. If you do, you are a denier, even if you happen to be Jewish and you'll likely be fined and thrown in jail. This is the ONLY so called genocide which you CAN NOT QUESTION. The Armenian Genocide is fine to question and even deny.

And everything I've said IS NOT MEANT to whitewash the National Socialist regime of Germany from any of its undisputed wrongdoings, including execution of citizens and euthenasia. Imprisoning people without proper due process is a crime. Any authority committing such a crime ultimately bears responsibility for those in its custody.

However, this crime was not only committed by the German authorities prior to and during World War II, but during the war also by the U.S. authorities who imprisoned many Japanese Americans as well as Italian and German immigrants. The biggest criminal in this regard, however, was the US’s most important ally of the Second World War, the Soviet Union, where millions were imprisoned and ultimately murdered prior to, during and after the war.

Also, I found this quite interesting:

http://northshorenumismaticsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/NaziPalestina.jpg

THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT in 1933.

And yes, many Jews did die and were executed, I'm nto denying that. I'm more so saying that there are a lot of myths and atrocity propaganda perpetuated by this industry.

So, in conclusion, the genocide has been exaggerated and many anti-Zionsit Jews have written great books concerning this , in places invented, in order to bolster Israeli interests and has grown such that it undergirds the 3 billion Dollars in aid that the USA gives Israel each year; it is, the author adverts (Finkelstein), 'leverage' (in that unlovely business lexicon, its American pronunciation adopted overseas in an act of unconscious allegiance). This is Finkelstein's provocative thesis and his is an extremely readable, scholarly polemic with impressive credentials.

The Holocaust is freighted and intimately connected to the true Special Relationship, of the U.S.A., with the State of Israel, indeed it is put to use by each. Like the good sociologist he is, he demonstrates that until the 1960's not much was made of the issue, whereas now Holocaust memorials are everywhere and culturally the fate of the murdered Jews looms larger: as a symbol The Holocaust is enormous when in living memory it was once invisible, a thing even of shame. The book explains how such a change has occurred and argues that it has served extreme Israeli interests, an 'extremism' become mainstream when Begin led Likud to victory in the 1970s; when Yiztak Rabin was assassinated after a disgraceful and provocative assault on allegedly too conciliatory a position on Palestine, and consolidated by the assumptions of Sharon and Netanyahu more recently. Of course only a clod would not lament the ghastly slaughter, but not all of them were Jews. To know the use to which it is put by, infamously, AIPAC in America, and too many Israeli leaders i.e. to quash any resolution of The Palestinian Question, does Israel no favours. And as the part played by Eli Wiesel here almost cruelly demonstrates, the ideological leverage to which this 'industry' is put shames many.