you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (23 children)

Don't understand the point of these posts. So what if there was a large population of jews in the Bolshevik party, what does that prove? Also, Lenin was a lot more accepting of jews than Stalin. Once Stalin came to power the real purges began.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Well I guess the main point would be that the ideologies and motivations that created Lenin's Russia still exist to this day, and might be re-creating this trajectory in other governments.

Bolsheviks should be blamed though, not Jews. Because the overwhelming majority of Jews are not Bolsheviks.

However the overwhelming majority of high-level Bolsheviks are Jews, which itself is interesting.

But again, this is a condemnation of Bolsheviks, not Jews, because most Jews are not Bolsheviks. And I really don't like it when people try to "Blame the Jews" because it's a huge category. It's like blaming "white people" for USSR. It's much too broad and doesn't really actually get at anything useful.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Very true, right wing leninists and new modernized trotskyites still exist today. Many of these mass murderers did have children and family who probably still adhere to these backwards ideologies.

and might be re-creating this trajectory in other governments.

And this is why it is important to point out what I've laid out above. I'm tired of people telling me to be quite or hush up when I talk about this.

It is a documentation of Bolsheviks and their ranks which for many years was controlled by atheistic apostate Jews. I should also note, almost no enthnic Russians had any real power during this time, in their own country!! That is important to tell.

The thing is, Judaism is a religion, and in bolshevik Russia they hated religion but these apostate Jews usually didn't harm Jews unless they got in their way or did not adhere to class warfare. The original poster is NOT blaming all Jews, his title says, the Jewish role. However, we first must DEFINE what Judaism is? Is it an ethnicity, a religion, both or a whole lot of things?

So If we call them apostate Jews then we are effectively showing that we are not blaming all Jews, just apostates that classify themselves as Jews and atheist.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

However, we first must DEFINE what Judaism is? Is it an ethnicity, a religion, both or a whole lot of things?

Yes, that's the exact problem. It means 20 different things, so it's important to use much more specific language, and pinpoint actual problem ideologies. This makes the problem actually solvable, instead of it morphing in to a holocaust situation where misdirected anger is put toward scapegoats (which actually ended up benefiting those at the very top during and after WW2). It's very important to use careful terminology, it could be the difference between another holocaust and not having one. The Zionists want nothing more than people hating the Jews (but of course ignoring the Zionists specifically). They can hide in the noise this way.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree 100%. I still do not know what Judaism really is though. I'm under the belief that it is a religion only and morphed into a faux-race. THough, there have been some shoddy studies showing some Jewish gene. idk. I only illustrated that they were apostate Jews, and that they identified themselves as Jews and thus I listed them as Jews. That doesn't mean they are the dictionary definition of Jews, or follow the values and principles of judaism nor do they represent all Jews. Just as Zionist Jews, do not represent all other Jews. I f Judaism is just a religion, it amkes everything a lot more easier to understand, but the lines have been blurred and I wish I could figure it out.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And I want to say, we are allowed to say they are Jewish, because they identify as Jews. Pointing this out doesn't mean we want to genocide these specific people who call themselves Jews. I am not generalizing that all Jews are like these people who identify as Jews. The good Jew being highly propagandized should see that neconservative Jews are warmongering lunatics and are not good Jews at all, it is a shame that some good Jews call you antisemitic if you point out the crimes of Jews, jsut because they are Jewish. And the existence of Gentiles in positions of power does that invalidate the fact that specific people who identify as Jews, who because of this identification make up less than 2% of the population control a hugely disproportionate amount of influential positions in the media and government. The thing is these people are proud of this and boast about it. Yet, when people point this out they are censored and demonized. And god forbid you publically point out a Zionist warmonger who identifies as a Jew, and your career is ruined.

It is simply an observable fact, nothing to do with shadowy “far-right propaganda” and some amorphous and unnamed figures that apparently are lurking just around the corner.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

CNN and Fox News and the rest of the US corporate media promote the ZIonist agenda. Many Jewish sects are against Zionism and are classified as self-hating Jews, a Zionist tactic.

So let us see if this works: When I mention Jews herein, please understand, that I'm refering to Zionist Jews and Zionist gentiles only. For example, Murdoch is an ardent Zionist gentile who has ties to Mossad.

If Jewish Zionists (not representable of all Jews in the diaspora) represent less than 1.5% o of the US population, would it be unusual for a media organization (whose parent company has a Zionist Jewish president and Jewish-majority of C-level executives) to also have a Jewish President and Jewish Vice-President, a Jewish-majority of Executive Vice Presidents, and a Lead Political Anchor, Chief Political Correspondent, Chief Political Analyst, Chief Political Director, Chief National Correspondent, and Chief Washington Correspondent--all 6 of its “Chief” anchor positions—who are all Jewish, as well as a majority—at least 13—of the network’s currently running shows having Jewish hosts?

Now if you classify ZIonism as a good thing...

Certain Jews should be proud of their accomplishments in media and elsewhere. Yes, in the not-so-distant past, Jewish people were targeted and forced to wear Star of David emblems. However, I'm merely pointing out how a small group of people, Zionists the majority who identify as Jews; such a tiny fractional minority of the whole, is so overwhelmingly disproportionately in positions of power, money, and media.

It's actually hard trying to not generalize all Jews in with this. It's almsot like that was a propaganda tactic so that nobody could question Zionism or the role apostate Jews played in Bolshevism. They want you to generalize the entire Jewish diaspora with their odeologies that way you look liek an antisemite.

Okay, for the next section, the majority if not all of these people who identify as Jews are not orthodox Jews or practice the religion of Judaism. Many are atheistic Jews and secular Zionist Jews.

Okay, so:

Of the 67 senior executives of the major television and radio news networks, 47 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 70%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television and radio news networks by a factor of 35 times, or 3,500%.

Of the 12 senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations, nine are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 75%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations by a factor of 37.5 times, or 3,750%.

Of the 60 senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies, 50 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions and talent agencies by a factor of 41.5 times, or 4,150%.

Of the 46 senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners, 28 are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners by a factor of 30.5 times, 3,050%.

Of the 46 senior executives of the major advertising corporations and trade associations, 31 are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major advertising corporations and trade associations by a factor of 33.5 times, 3,350%.

Of the 65 senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines, 42 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines by a factor of 32.5 times, 3,250%.

Of the 50 senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations, 39 are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 78%. Jews are approximately 2% of the US. population. Therefore, Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations by a factor of 39 times, or 3,900%.

Of the 64 senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks and production companies, 56 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 88%. Jews are approximately 2% of the US. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks and production companies by a factor of 44 times, 4,400%.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

hen I mention Jews herein, please understand, that I'm refering to Zionist Jews and Zionist gentiles only.

Then say "Zionists" not "Jews" because it's very confusing for everyone else. I don't know why you would use the word "Jews" when you just said the common denominator is the Zionism, not the Jews

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Because they identify as Jews. And it's not just Zionism. Talmudic Orthodox Judaism as a religion does have many supremacy tendencies that promote Zionism. So, yes Zionism is an adjective for certain sects of Judaism. Because these Supremacists claim they are the chosen ones who have a right to a land over another one. More than 50% of Jews, unfortunately support Zionism.

I'd just suggest that you research Judaism as a religion from the Talmud. And those who practice it. These people indeed call themselves Jews and the majority of Jews of different sects would also claim that they are good faith Jews, yet they have a supremacy ideology where they beleive the goy or gentiles should serve them. In fact, the gentiles are animals and not humans to many of them.

And then you have millions of people saying they are secular atheistic Jews who do not follow Judaism.

Honestly, only a small sect of Torah Jews who are persecuted in Israel are the real Israelites and the real Jews in my opinion. Which would mean the people I mentioned above are not really Jews. Neoconservatvies included. Okay, so if nearly all the necon war mongers who identify as Jews, but are not. What are they?

Jesus tells us who they are, but even typing out this verse is considered antisemitic. "The synagouge of Satan." Because they call themselves Jews but are not.

If Talmudism is Judaism, than I'm 100% agaisnt Judaism. But me being a follower of Jesus and doing my best to help others in my community, I love these people very much, no matter their trangressions or wrongdoings.

Jesus Christ denounced the Pharisees. He said they nullified all the Commandments of God by their Tradition, "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" (Mark 7:13; Matt. 15:6-9)

He likened Pharisaism to a whited sepulchre, indeed beautiful outwardly, but "inside full of dead men's bones and of all uncleanness." Christ climaxed one condemnation after another with the expletive, "Hypocrites!" He called the Pharisees children of them that killed the Prophets. He foretold they would go on killing, crucifying and persecuting until the guilt for all the righteous blood shed from Abel on down would be upon them. "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" Christ asked.

Christ is as utterly devastating of Pharisaism in the record of John 8. Although He admitted that His hearers were descendants of Abraham, He said they were, spiritually, of the devil. Christ told them:

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because the truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it (John 8:44).

"what has that to do with us today? What a group of Pharisees did two thousand years ago is over and done with!"

However, the missing link in Christian understanding on the subject of "Pharisees" is best supplied by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943):

The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single piece of that literature … and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.

Concerning the Pharisees, the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia says:

With the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.) the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition (Abot 1:1). Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future.

Historically speaking, scripture believers had accepted Christ as the Messiah foretold. They were no longer "Jews," but called themselves "Christians." They were persecuted as such by the Pharisees. The word "Pharisee" comes from the word "separated."

You may ascertain by turning to top Jewish authorities today that the Babylonian Talmud, the written form of the Tradition of the Pharisees, is the sole authority of the so-called "Jewish" religion, or Judaism.

Rabbi Louis Finklestein was chosen in 1937 by the Kehillas (Jewish communities) of the World as one of the top 120 Jews best representing "a lamp of Judaism" to the World, together with Maxim Litvinov (Finklestein), the Communist Commissar and bank robber terrorist; atheist communist Albert Einstein; those indefatigable Marxist reds, Harold Laski and his friend Felix Frankfurter (U.S. Supreme Court Justice) who shared honors with Rabbi Finklestein and others. Finklestein has long headed the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, with branches in New York and Los Angeles. In his two-volume work "The Pharisees." Rabbi Finklestein writes:

Pharasaism became Talmudism … But the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew … studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies. From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy. Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland. Russia and Eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharasaism has wandered. (See Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, and Exhibit 3 herein.)

In Rabbi Finklestein's history of the Jews, he states:

The Talmud derives its authority from the position held by the ancient academies. (i.e. Pharisee) The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of Palestine. were considered the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin . . . At the present time, the Jewish people have no living central authority comparable in status to the ancient Sanhedrins or the later academies. Therefore, any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be based on the Talmud as the final resumé of the teaching of those authorities when they existed.

[page 2] (The Jews — Their History, Culture, and Religion , Vol. 4, p. 1332, Jewish Publication Society of America, 1949).

"The Talmud: Heart's Blood of the Jewish Faith," was the heading of a November, 1959, installment of a bestselling book by the Jewish author, Herman Wouk, which ran serially in the New York Herald-Tribune.

To quote:

The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe — whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists — we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.

Why Was It So Often Burned?


Why is the Talmud kept so unknown to non-Jews? Why was there no usable English translation of the Talmud until the Soncino Edition, 1934-48? Why, in European history, when the laws of the Talmud became commonly known, was it burned over and over by order of the Popes, excoriated by Martin Luther, denounced everywhere, and its followers exiled from one country after another down through the centuries?

The Talmud's basic law is that only the Pharisee Jew ranks as a man, or human being. All others rank as animals, "the people who are like an ass — slaves who are considered the property of the master." The attitude resulting from such teachings has been resented by non-Jews in all countries and centuries. Such resentment, however, is always portrayed by Jews as "persecution of the Jews."

Moses, on the contrary, was most insistent upon having one law for the stranger and for the "home-born" and in teaching that the stranger must not be oppressed. (Exodus 12:49; Lev. 24:22, Num. 9:14; 15:15-16, 29, etc.) In fact, he ordered: "Love ye therefore the stranger; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt." (Deu. 10:19) It was only the abominators he warned against.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Because they identify as Jews.

Not the non-jewish zionists... of which there are many.

So, it is Jewish Zionism, Christian Zionism

Right, so let's just call them zionists, because that's what they call themselves.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, that is true, but that is primarily because of The Scofield Bible.

There are Christian Zionists, that are fooled by Judaism into believing that God will destroy America if you do not promote Zionism.

It is DISPENSATIONALISM...

This erroneous doctrine, Dispensationalism, which has resulted in the Judaizing of American Evangelical Christianity and has been successful in converting Evangelical Christian Americans into Christian Zionists, who are not following the teachings of Jesus Christ, the New Testament, or traditional orthodox Christianity at all.

Jesus himself cursed Israel and proclaimed its soon abandonment by God, in Matthew 23, especially verse 38, as well as its destruction at the hands of the Roman armies (see Luke 21:20) within the lifetimes of those who heard his words (see Matt. 24:34), Judaized Christians, or Christian Zionists will appeal to the teachings of the Old Testament, especially Genesis 12:3, in direct contradiction to the teachings of Jesus Christ found in the New Testament, and they will insist that all Christians must support and bless Israel in order to be faithful to God.

I have found that a good many 9-11 Truthers reject Christianity. One reason is the Pavlovian flag-waving of Christian pastors who throw their support behind war after war that is slaughtering the people of the Middle East. These pastors have abandoned the love of Christ for a revived book of Joshua, believing it is their “Christian duty” to support the Zionists’ bloody conquest of Palestine. They IGNORE that Zionism was financed by the Rothschilds (who also financed Communism, which exterminated Christians by the million). They IGNORE that most calling themselves Jews today are descended from Khazaria, NOT Abraham, and have no conceivable “Biblical” claim to the land whatsoever.

And many Christian Zionists give aid to Israel not because of their brainwashing from modernism but because they are Zionists solely so they can help bring about the end times.

The Jewish Messiah, or Moshiach which to them and I is a false messiah or antichrist will bring about the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ who will destroy the prince of nations.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Babylonian Talmud — The Law

The Babylonian Talmud is the law for so-called Judaism. However, its pornographic, anti-Gentile and anti-Christian doctrines have often caused hostility against it. It may then be argued by some Jews that there is a Palestinian Talmud which is innocuous. Nevertheless, you may look up the fact that Jewish authorities state it was lost for a thousand years, has missing parts and lacks the "Gemara" and other essentials, and is only used as a scholar's curiosity. Note the statement of British Chief Rabbi Hertz in his foreword to the Soncino edition of the Babylonian Talmud:

The Palestinian Talmud … was for many centuries almost forgotten by Jewry. Its legal decisions were at no time deemed to possess validity, if opposed by the Babylonian Talmud.

Without some knowledge of the written form of the "Tradition of the Pharisees," the Babylonian Talmud, one is unable to intelligently judge whether Jesus Christ was fair and just in His acid denunciations of Pharisaism, or not. One needs proof, offered by the irrefutable exhibits from Jewish authorities (set forth elsewhere herein) that the Talmud reverses every one of the Ten Commandments, the teachings of Moses and the Prophets, and enshrines their opposites under a "whited sepulchre" which is a disguise for murder and "all uncleanness," as Christ charged. Murder of non-Pharisees is always permitted; theft, sodomy, incest, rape are all permitted. For example, the righteousness of grown men violating baby girls under three is a favorite topic for discussion in book after book of the Talmud.

Talmudic literature is one long paean of praise for the very name Babylon, and all that it means to Babylonian Talmudism today, whereas it is a term of reproach in Old and New Testaments.

Note the Foreword to the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud by the late Chief Rabbi of Great Britain, J.H. Hertz, who, like Rabbi Finklestein, was one of the 120 Jews chosen in 1937 by the Kehillas of the World as best holding up the "lamp of Judaism:"

The beginnings of Talmudic literature date back to the time of the Babylonian Exile in the Sixth pre-Christian Century … When a thousand years later, the Babylonian Talmud assumed final codified form in the year 500 after the Christian era, the Roman Western Empire had ceased to be. (See Exhibit 30).

Rabbi Hertz extolls the Babylonian Exile, saying: "The Babylonian Exile is a momentous period … During that Exile Israel found itself. It … rediscovered the Torah and made it the rule of life …"

What he really means is that it was discovered how the Torah or Bible could be used as a "whited sepulchre" for Babylonian degeneracy, as even a cursory study will reveal.

One Rabbi Akiba was a First Century Talmud "sage," of whom Moses was even supposedly jealous! (See Exhibit 32). Rabbi Hertz lauds Rabbi Akiba (Exhibit 32):

Akiba was the author of a collection of traditional laws out of which the Mishna actually grew. He was the greatest among the rabbis of his own and of succeeding times … His keen and penetrating intellect enabled him to find a Biblical basis for every provision of the Oral Law.

Still enthusing over the Babylonian derivation of Pharisaism, Rabbi Hertz continues (See Exhibit 34):

When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealing with what most people understand when they speak or write of the Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an autonomous Jewish center for a longer period than any other land; namely from soon after 586 before the Christian era to the year 1040 after the Christian Era — 1626 years. (Exhibit 34)

[page 3] You will note in reproductions of Talmud pages that the word "Gemara" designates the argumentation of the rabbis, the ultimate decision being summarized as the "Mishnah." Bible Versus Oral Law (Talmud)

The Bible under Talmudic Judaism is considered to be a collection of simple tales fit only for fools, women and children. The Talmud "sages" thus must find new meanings in it by letter and number tricks which reverse the plain meaning and create out of it the permission to do otherwise forbidden crimes and misdeeds. The words of the Bible are continually misused and misquoted for purposes of blasphemy and reversal.

Stealing for themselves the title of "Israelites," the Talmud "sages" teach that "God made a covenant with Israel only for the sake of that which was transmitted orally." (See Exhibit 60) And the Biblical "basis" of this is given as Exodus 34:27. But that verse states, instead: "And the Lord said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel" — the opposite! (Talmud, Gittin 60b, See Exhibit 204) The Talmudic reversal of Moses' written words are said to have been transmitted "orally," and through Moses himself — believe it or not!

Bearing in mind that the Scribes were the Pharisee teachers of the Law of Moses, carefully distorted to comprise the Talmud, note: "There is greater stringency in respect to the teachings of the Scribes than in respect to the Torah … so that a Biblical law may be transgressed." (Talmud, Sanhedrin 88b, see Exhibit 95).

The Torah in its narrow sense is the Old Testament, and in a still narrower meaning the first five books (Pentateuch) of Moses. In its wider Judaistic use it means the Old Testament as misinterpreted by the Pharisaic Talmud. Always with Judaism the Talmud ranks above the Bible in every way.

Not reproduced here is a Talmud passage from the book of Nedarim (vows) of which Exhibit 170 is the title page. The Soncino edition of the Talmud states (page 107):

As will be seen on 37a, Scripture was generally regarded as the study of children only, adults usually investigating the deeper meaning … From this we see that it was usual to teach the Bible to girls in spite of the Talmudic deduction that daughters need not be educated (Kid. 30a). The opposition of Rabbi Eliezer to teaching the Torah to one's daughter (Sotah 20a "He who teaches his daughter Torah is as though he taught her lewdness.") was probably directed against the teaching of the Oral Law, and the higher branches of study (V. Maimonides Yad. Talmud Torah) … The context shows that the reference is to the higher knowledge of Biblical law.

The Talmud (Sanhedrin 59a, See Exhibit 60), states:

A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death for it is written, Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs.

Reference is also made to the "Noachian laws" which the non-Jew may study "but not laws which do not pertain to them." Also: " … (the) objection was to the studying of the Oral Law … Rabbi Johanan feared the knowledge of Gentiles in matters of Jurisprudence, as they would use it against the Jews in their opponents' courts." Understandably, since all Talmud laws discriminate against the non-Jew and rank him a virtual animal, these were apt observations.

The Jewish Encyclopedia is still more open about what is in Sanhedrin 59a of the Talmud, above, threatening death for revelation of "Torah" laws to Gentiles: "for such knowledge might have operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts." This observation follows a dissertation on the laws on cheating and getting the best of Gentiles in trade and in court. (See Exhibit 271, left column)

The Babylonian Talmud


The Babylonian Talmud is composed of "Mishnah" (or "Halacha"), or laws formulated by the Pharisees whose teachings comprise the Talmud, and "Gemara," or argumentative teachings about these laws. There are 63 books in the Babylonian Talmud, largely divided without topical organization.

All Talmud books have "Mishnah" (plural "Mishnaim"). Some lack a "Gemara." The "Mishnah" or law of one or another Pharisee may be referred to, for example, as the "Mishnah of Rabbi Akiba," or of "Eliezer ben Jacob."

"The name Mishnah is applied in particular to the collection of Halachoth, or laws, made by Judah Hanasi (generally known as Rabbi) and his colleagues at the beginning of the 3rd Century C.E." (Note: "CE." stands for "Common Era," to avoid "AD" or "Year of Our Lord," from the Latin, Anno Domini.) (See Jewish Encyclopedia "Mishnah")

Continuing to quote from the Jewish Encyclopedia:

The Mishnah represents the culmination of a series of attempts to bring order into the vast mass of traditions which had been transmitted orally for many centuries … The compiliation of the Mishnah is not, however, the work of one man, or even of the scholars of one age, but rather the result of a long process extending over a period of two centuries.

The ultimate in infamy in Talmudic Judaism is Christ, and the target of all Talmudic hatred is not just "the people who are like an ass; slaves who are considered the property of the master. (Keth. 111a) The docile "asses" willing to be saddled and used will be used as burden bearers for the masters. But of all the recalcitrant "asses" the Christians are the most insanely hated and loathed because their doctrines are the reverse of every Talmudic doctrine. They rank not just as animals like the rest of non-Talmudic humanity, but as vermin to be eradicate. Language is exhausted to find more foul and hated names for Christians in the Talmud.

Just research the sonocio Talmud. Look what it says about gentiles in it.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For reference here's what it says in the ""Wisdom of Solomon"""


A Prophecy of Christ from the Apocrypha


The Wisdom of Solomon 2:12-20, banned by the Catholic Church and early Jewish Sects,

Solomon says:

12 "Let us lie in wait for the righteous man, because he is inconvenient to us, and he opposes our actions and reproaches us for sins against the law and ascribes to us sins against our training.

13 He professes to have divine knowledge and calls himself a child of the Lord;

14 he has become a reproof to us of our thoughts; he is a burden to us even to see,

15 because his life is unlike that of others and his behavior is different.

16 We are considered by him to be base, and he keeps distant from our ways as from uncleanness. He calls the last end of the righteous happy and boasts that God is his father.

17 Let us see if his words are true, and let us test what will happen at the end of his life;

18 for if the righteous man is a divine son, he will help him and will rescue him from the hand of those who oppose him.

19 Let us afflict him with insult and torture, that we may learn how reasonable he is and may put his forbearance to the test.

20 Let us condemn him to a shameful death, for, according to his words, he will be watched over."


So, no I do not hate Jews at all, but clearly many of these sects identify as Jews and practice a doctrine that is markedly warped and backwards.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And do not forget these PEOPLE WHO IDENTIFY AS JEWS brag about this when they aren't saying "it's antisemitic canard!"

https://archive.is/O8s3d/d4fabf5ccaeacd7cdaf5f773a67d29ec75950b40 ^ ^ ^ Notice, Manny Friedman, On July 1, 2012, The Times of Israel published an essay by Huffington Post blogger Elad Nehorai titled, “Jews DO Control the Media”. Intended to be read by Jews, soon after the article began to receive the scrutiny of readers outside of its intended audience, Times of Israel replaced the author’s name with the alias “Manny Friedman,” perhaps because of Nehorai’s connection to the Chabad Lubavitch — a messianic, Jewish supremacist (Jews are an extension of God whom Gentiles are destined to serve), Orthodox Hasidic movement with a global reach (this, mentioned above). Some say the sect means to trigger a Third World War to bring on doomsday and the resultant reign of the Jewish people. President Trump’s son-in-law. As I’ve stated above, Jared Kushner and daughter Ivanka (who converted to Judaism) are members. Nehorai’s biographical profile on the Huffington Post says:

Elad Nehorai is a writer living in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. Five years ago, he became a religious Jew in the Chabad Hassidic community and has since written about his experience extensively, most recently in his blog Pop Chassid.

Here’s the original article:

https://archive.is/ihHMJ

This article was written under an assumed name… [magnora7, please read it] I'm not going to quote anything so you can see what this Zionist wrote in clear wording.



We Jews are a funny breed. We love to brag about every Jewish actor. Sometimes we even pretend an actor is Jewish just because we like him enough that we think he deserves to be on our team. We brag about Jewish authors, Jewish politicians, Jewish directors. Every time someone mentions any movie or book or piece of art, we inevitably say something like, “Did you know that he was Jewish?” That’s just how we roll.

We’re a driven group, and not just in regards to the art world. We have, for example, AIPAC, which was essentially constructed just to drive agenda in Washington DC. And it succeeds admirably. And we brag about it. Again, it’s just what we do. [but if a gentile mentions it, his career and livelihood is ruined.]

But the funny part is when any anti-Semite or anti-Israel person starts to spout stuff like, “The Jews control the media!” and “The Jews control Washington!”

Suddenly we’re up in arms. We create huge campaigns to take these people down. We do what we can to put them out of work. We publish articles. We’ve created entire organizations that exist just to tell everyone that the Jews don’t control nothin’. No, we don’t control the media, we don’t have any more sway in DC than anyone else. No, no, no, we swear: We’re just like everybody else!

Does anyone else (who’s not a bigot) see the irony of this?

Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be “Tropic Thunder” or “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews? But that’s not all. We also control the ads that go on those TV shows.

And let’s not forget AIPAC, every anti-Semite’s favorite punching bag. We’re talking an organization that’s practically the equivalent of the Elders of Zion. I’ll never forget when I was involved in Israeli advocacy in college and being at one of the many AIPAC conventions. A man literally stood in front of us and told us that their whole goal was to only work with top-50 school graduate students because they would eventually be the people making changes in the government. Here I am, an idealistic little kid that goes to a bottom 50 school (ASU) who wants to do some grassroots advocacy, and these guys are literally talking about infiltrating the government. Intense.

Now, I know what everyone will say. That everyone tries to lobby. Every minority group and every majority group. That every group has some successful actors and directors. But that’s a far call from saying that we run Hollywood and Madison Avenue. That the Mel Gibsons of the world are right in saying we’re deliberately using our power to take over the world. That we’ve got some crazy conspiracy going down.

Okay. Fine. So some of that is kooky talk.

But let’s look at it a bit deeper.

Maybe it’s true: everyone lobbies. Maybe it’s true there are actors of every ethnicity out there. But come on. We’re the ones who are bragging about this stuff all the time. Can’t we admit that we’re incredibly successful? Can’t we say it to the world?

I’ll give my theory for why Jews don’t want to talk about their control of the media.

First of all, as much as Jews like to admit that so many of them are successful, and that so many of them have accomplished so much, they hate to admit that it has to do with they’re being Jewish. Maybe they’ll admit that it has something to do with the Jewish experience. But how many Jews will admit that there is something inherently a part of every single one of them that helps them to accomplish amazing things?

The ADL chairman, Abe Foxman, was interviewed in a great article about the subject and he said that he “would prefer people say that many executives in the industry ‘happen to be Jewish.’” This just about sums up the party line.

The truth is, the anti-Semites got it right. We Jews have something planted in each one of us that makes us completely different from every group in the world. We’re talking about a group of people that just got put in death camps, endured pogroms, their whole families decimated. And then they came to America, the one place that ever really let them have as much power as they wanted, and suddenly they’re taking over. Please don’t tell me that any other group in the world has ever done that. Only the Jews. And we’ve done it before. That’s why the Jews were enslaved in Egypt. We were too successful. Go look at the Torah — it’s right there. And we did it in Germany too.

This ability to succeed, this inner drive, comes not from the years of education or any other sort of conditional factors, but because of the inner spark within each Jew.

Now, the reason groups like the ADL and AIPAC hate admitting this is because, first of all, they are secular organizations. Their whole agenda is to prove that every Jew is the same as every other person in the world. I cannot imagine a more outlandish agenda. No, we’re different. We’re special.

Of course, people hate when anyone says this. They assume that if you’re saying that Jews are special, it somehow implies that they’re better.

To be honest, I’m not really sure what the word “better” even means. What I do know is that being special simply means a person has a responsibility to do good.

I think that’s the real reason most Jews are so afraid to admit that there’s something inherently powerful and good about them. Not because they’re afraid of being special. But because they’re afraid of being responsible. It means that they’re suddenly culpable when they create dirty TV shows that sully the spiritual atmosphere of the world. It means that things can’t just be created for the sake of amusement or fun or even “art.”

Suddenly, we can’t screw up the world.

The interesting thing is that Jews have done so much for the world in so many other ways. They’ve moved forward civil rights; they’ve helped save lives in Darfur, Haiti and just about everywhere else.

But that’s not enough. Fixing the world physically is only half the battle.

Our larger battle, the harder battle, is elevating the world spiritually. And this is what the people that fight with every inch of their soul to prove that Jews are just the same as everyone else are afraid of. It means that we can no longer just “express ourselves.” We’ll have to start thinking about the things we create and the way we act. It means we’ll have to start working together. It means we’ll have to hold one other, and ourselves, to a higher standard.

The time has come, though. We no longer have to change our names. We no longer have to blend in like chameleons. We own a whole freaking country.

Instead, we can be proud of who we are, and simultaneously aware of our huge responsibility — and opportunity.

https://archive.is/o/O8s3d/www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column


Also. I'm researching Judaism. And I have to admit, the Torah biblical people who identify as Jews, such as the Ethiopian Jews, many of whom converted to Ethiopian Christianity and have an entire bible written in Ge'ez are truely people of God. These Jews are persecuted in Israel.

However, certain Talmud forms of Judaism certainly reek of supremacy.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh no... Somebody on saidit posting in the conspiracy sub believes in the hollow cost.

Ouch.

[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But Lenins idea for russia much different than what Stalins russia came to be. Stalin purged almost all the old Bolshevik leaders, etc., so I still have trouble seeing the significance of this.

[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Is it though? There seems to be way more condemnation of Jews in this thread than anything to do with Bolsheviks. Also, why does thr same exact post show up every week about Jews this or Jews that? I've seen this Jews + Bolshevik posted probably 5 to 6 times in the last month, why? Why when I go to the new section of this site it's looking more and more like a voat "ruck certain groups" circle jerk? Why does the creator of this site defend such posts and site this discussion pyramid when it's not being followed?

Look I'm all for a good discussion or debate but this isn't either of those. This is someone spaming the front page with what they believe or don't believe. Why not just pod this once and move on? Why is it the same exact post every week and why is it the same three people having a fingering contest about who can hate stuff more? And why are you in here defending it? This post isn't about Bolshevik s its about Jews & Judaism, for you to say otherwise is disingenuous and factually wrong. Read the comments my friend its all about Jews. This stuff gets boring & it degrads the site. This is just my opinion of course you run your site the way you want but I've come to respect you for what you are trying to do & seeing you defend this post makes me sad.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nobody is spamming. 5 posts a month about this is not spamming be real here. He's defending it because he defends free speech and nobody is promoting hate here. It is about Bolsheviks in the 1st government who identify as apostate atheistic Jews, or merely ethnic Jews who then went on to murder 10 million Christians and Muslims in a Gulag system that they created. If the noble peace prize winner Alexamder Solzhenitsyn is barred from publishing his 200 years together book in English, then we should have a duty to post what he tried to explain. This isn't my post and unfortunately the author didn't specify what kind of Judaism. But maybe that's already obvious. That is, he doesn't have to because I know he doesn't mean all Jews at all. However, he should specify.

Again, not all Jews. But maybe research why a large swath of Jewish sects hold a supremacy agenda. Research the Sonocio Talmud. Of course not all Jews follow the Talmud but a large majority do. And in my eight part series on Bolshevism, Jewry, Stalinism, communism, etc., I make it clear, if you read it, that many Jews were against the classless society that many so called atheistic ethnic Jewsish bolsheviks and gentile bolsheviks were trying to create. It also could be considered a crusade too, as 40 million Christians perished.


I went to NEW and there was one bolshevik, Jewish post on the 2nd page. Stop trying to promote censorship. The posts are clearly following the pyramid of debate. There's clearly a difference between my posts and the hateful posts of Voat and 8chan, which are merely ploys that promote censorship.

Ignore these historical posts if you find them offensive, they are in small number anyway.

Agains, no hate here. Though, I notice there is some people that post material like mine generalizing all Jewry and the Jewish diaspora into one catagory. I'm not doing that. Read any of my submissions, such as the 8 part series I posted a month ago.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There seems to be way more condemnation of Jews in this thread than anything to do with Bolsheviks.

Yes, that's rather my point!

This post isn't about Bolshevik s its about Jews & Judaism, for you to say otherwise is disingenuous and factually wrong.

I didn't make the post. I am voicing the same angle you are, so I'm not sure why you're speaking as if I am the problem.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They aren't bolsheviks when they don't need to be bolsheviks in order to gain power over the goyim.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Now they're neoconseravties which was created out of the trotskyite movement. They want war, foreign revolutions and a crappy welfare state set up in the US.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Read my post above. They are atheistic apostate Jews. Lenin and Stalin both made antisemitism illegal. (Party because the Bolshevik government were apostate Jews, and also because antisemitism made people less likely to work and merge into one classless society.) The cheka, directed by mostly apostate Jews in the first and 2nd Bolshevik governance would execute people who had so called antisemitic views. Stalin didn't purge the Old Bolsheviks because he hated Jews, in fact many of Stalin's mass murdering friends were atheistic apostate Jews. He purged the Old Bolsheviks because many were his opponents, just as ruthless as he was. They just had a different idea of how to go about communism.

wikipedia says:

The campaign of purges prominently targeted Stalin's former opponents and other Old Bolsheviks, and included a large-scale purge of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, repression of the kulak peasants, Red Army leaders, and ordinary citizens accused of conspiring against Stalin's administration.[9] Although many of Great Purge victims were ethnic or religious Jews, they were not specifically targeted as an ethnic group during this campaign according to Mikhail Baitalsky,[10] Gennady Kostyrchenko, David Priestland, Jeffrey Veidlinger, Roy Medvedev[14] and Edvard Radzinsky., though many historians like to promote this myth.

[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ok your point is taken but I still don't see the point in posting this every week. We get it you guys don't like Jews for whatever reason, cool, but flooding the site with the same irrelevant info every week is just annoying & idt rates very high on this discussion pyramid you guys get wet over.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I never said I don't like Jews, your putting words in my mouth. (Also Imm getting wet?) One post a week about the history of Bolshevism and you think it is irrealavent that many of the same ideologies have effectively, and sucessfully conducted a coup in the US via the neoconservative (neotrotskyites) agenda that came out of Bolshevism. It's much more than Zionism because many apostate atheistic Jews promote this same supremacist agenda, despite them having no religious ideologies. And that the media and our government pushes a supremacy agenda because just maybe there's some apostates in power that identifiy as Jews, Jesuits and Catholics included. And pointing this out, I need to shut my mouth or be censored, when the majority of posts on saidit are nothing more than filler.

I'm not alt-right, I'm not even against Jews because many Jewish sects, so called self-hating Jews, are also against the supremacy of certain Jewish sects. You should know by now that we are not generalizing all Jews into one catagory. I and many orhers who promote this make that clear. It is you who tries to use this strawman.

No where in my posts do I ever say I do not like Jews. Maybe you should go on 8chan and voat, because they're the ones that promote the hate.