all 8 comments

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The Rothschild dynasty and Rockefeller family were very much at odds with each other. Business is business and when one family inches there way into banking to seize fortune and put a stake in the game, the other will surely try to prevent them from succeeding. It's false to assume that there's merely one entity working to secure global governance. It's hundreds, with different and conflicting ideas of how to achieve it.

If Hilary won the elections things would be very much the same, though, we can only speculate.

Trump has filled the swamp up with the most warhawk neoconservatives and they and he has direct relationships with the PNAC authors who were the absolute orchestrators in the WTC demolitions. So, the way in which things are going is all concocted. It is merely theater for the masses. And yes, the neoconservatives are ALL Zionists. A coup has occured in the US by neocons (neotrotskyites) since 2001.

If Al Gore won the elections, being a statist himself, it is likely the WTC demolitions would go as planned, as the planning was done during the early Clinton years, the rigging from 1998 through 2001 and the concept was known and boasted about by Israeli Zionists since the late 1970's. All this to cover up insider trading, to kill those investigating the missing trillions in the exact area where the Pentagon was allegedly hit, to demolish WTC7 which also had millions of investigatory files, to obtain insurance money in order to build the already planned WTC7 and one world trade center tower in place of the asbestos ridden towers, and to promote the war on terror forever more in order to secure defense spending as written in PNAC's 'Rebuilding America's Defenses.'

As for the geopolitics of south west Asia, largely US proxies including Turkey, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar covertly armed ISIS (Da'esh) and lesser known jhadist groups such as Al Nusra front an Al Qaeda faction. In fact the US has admited to arming Al Nusra Front for destablization purposes. Though the salafist principality rising in south east Syria was indeed a destabilization campaign to prevent LNG piplines, it also is a great way to increase military defense spending during peacetime. War business is insanity.

What is interesting is that for awhile Assad was Israeli's man of the yeaar as was Putin. So, it appears Assad is very much on board with the Belt Road Inititive that will favor China, Iran, Russia, Syria, and Israel. Israel, in fact has given China many of our military secrets and has a history of treasonous acts. So, who does Israel really serve? They serve whoever they think will prosper and that prosperity is coming from the east as a multilateral economic order. The IMF and Bank of International Settlements have written many articles about this emerging global shift.

The Albert Pike WW3 scenario is FAKE!!! ALBERT PIKE did not write it. I believe it was a Christian Zionist after WW2 who wrote it. Albert Pike did not. I'd invite you to reaearch it by duckduckgoing or searxing it.

Since the Jews would not only probably end up losing Israel but get a bunch of their own killed, then how could greater Israel ever be the final plan of the NWO?

In the Bible it mentions that during the reign of the Antichrist in Jerusalem, Jews and (modern Christians alike) shall run to the hills, far from this king who sits atop the temple mount. He appears to be war like. He is the false messiah, a man who will destroy all Jews. Ultimately, atheistical persons will be spared. This will be a time of torment and bloodshed.

That's if the prophecy becomes reality. Trump and Netanyahu seem to be fulfilling the coming moshiach.

As for the whore of babylon, in revelation. Who will be the LAST KINGDOM TO FALL? And remember, many of the rulers believe that they need to fulfill these prophecies even if it is to be artificially and theatrically driven.

Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Rome, and the last is to be named. Which kingdom will fall? We know from the text it will be like Rome but not as strong. It will be of Iron and clay. So which kingdom is like Rome? That's for you to research.

In each of these kingdoms the population worshipped a women. So, what kingdom worships the women and the flesh before God?

The black pope is indeed antichrist, and same with those that call themselves Jews but are the synagogue of Satan. Implying those under the guise of Judaism. Such as Wolfowitz, Perle, Rabbi Dov Zakarim, and all the other trotskyite neconservatives that promote war and murder.

Jews have a tremendous influence in the media and in banking. There's no denying that. A lot of the sources you are posting are not credible and do not even provide evidence for what they claim is proof. Your first source is a misquote and Albert Pike who was not the author of the ww3 scenario.

If you want I can message you an entire ownership and co-ownership and director white paper to all of the biggest corporate media conglomerates in the US. The Zionist Jews are the head front of these news agencies. 6 of the largest are owned or were owned by Zionist Jews, all 6 owned since 2000 by Zionists. One being Rupert Murdoch a gentile Zionist who has close ties to Israeli mossad and spies who stole nuclear triggers for Israel. Something JFK wanted to stop at all costs.

Zionism has a stranglehold on the US, not the Jesuit ideology. As a matter of fact many Jesuits are cryptojews and I have a post about that, if you're willing to read it.

Neocons and the well placed scum at the top, Jews, catholics, nihilists (there's a lot of them who work as covert agents) it does not really matter though, are censoring anyone who questions 9/11 with help from Bill Kristol, Robert Kagen, JDIF, the ADL and all the PNAC neocon Israeli firsters. They merely use our military for global dominance as written in Rebuilding Americ's Defenses Doc. They are a detriment to the welfare and livlihood of the US and have conducted a soft coup here with help from the CIA and other intelligence agencies to curtail our liberties and self determination, which is only going to get worse. These are the only people who can boast about knocking down the twin towers and killing thousands, and get away with it. These are the only people that can advocate for war and in the process murder thousands and get teacher jobs at universities. They are the neoconservatives who the majority happen to be Jews but IN NO WAY REPRESENT THE IDEOLOGIES AND BELIEFS OF ALL Jews.

For the censor, those aforementioned, stir up strife whilst their censorship bolsters and hardens ideologies that they attempt to curtail. For censorship tries to promote the illusionary perception of indifference, it may even be appropriate at times or divisively harmful, and yet, still, truth prevails over all conflict. Regardless of the receding flood waters, the tides of time will surely make visible what is hidden.

Conversely, if men have forgotten God the truth will ebb into the depths of the sea. And thus, in the age of debauchery, decadence, and greed, hardening these ideologies will surely effectuate the reoccurring historical theme of bloodshed. This is why I'm against all forms of censorship.

In fact, the creation of a secular Jewish state isn't part of the agenda of the NWO.

I believe the agenda is to erase all religions and destroy Christians and Jews, and even Islam.

The Vatican is very much antichrist and a markedly corrupt system that jesus would never advocate for. For faith is a personal matter.

Something Rome and the Puritans would kill for. The quakerswho believed that God was a personal matter and a church hierarchy was not needed to talk to God were largely persecuted at the hands of the puritans.

Many denominations went on to persecute other denominations in Christianity and too, in the sects of Judaism and Islam.

I personally believe there are people masquarading as Jews who only look to destroy righteousness and rightful living on earth. There end goal is world governance and a one world religion through a multilateral order, which the current Likud party seems to advocate for. I believe at the helm, these are atheistical Jews and Catholics promoting this system which will be fronted at first by a faux-right wing populist movement. We see this occurring in Australia, the US and Europe right now.

I also notice many of the people who propped Trump up during the 2016 fake elections and Putin during his rise are in or have ties to a judaic cult called chabad Lubavich which awaits their Moshiach. In Christian Zionism, they believe that this comimg leader is the antichrist and will bring about the apocalypse and the 2nd coming. It's very odd.

Anyway, Trump and his advocates who get lots of corporate media airtime are actors playing parts. Richard Spencer, the Tommy Robinsons, all Zionists, are part of this deception. They have hijacked the nationalist, populist movements and flaunt the communist fist. I believe Trump is playing a part in the script that will bring in world facist communism.

The multilateral economic order will be a revamped united nations with Jerusalem as the center of world governance with a world court to settle all controversies. As Ben-Gurion predicted.

[–]HibikiBlack[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

You started out well, then you went completely nuts trying to fit the Jews into the whole mess like always Jesus. Seriously, show me evidence that the Rothschilds control any of those central banks.

The same goes with the control of the media. We can name Jews and Catholics that have influence in many of those places. But the CIA is the group that has the biggest influence over them and It's not controlled by Jews. It's nicknamed "The Catholic Intelligence Agency".

I myself said I don't believe Albert Pike wrote that letter. But I still found it funny because how well it describes current events. It could a way of revelation of the method.

Also, the Jesuits being a crypto Jewish group? Fucking laughable. The Jews were banned and even persecuted by the church.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The Jews infiltrated the Church and I can prove it but first read this: This illustrates how fake Jews, because if they really followed the principles of Judaism they would NOT advocate for murder and war.

"In defense of the world Order, U.S. soldiers would have to kill and die. ... We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood, as well as in words and money."

-- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Back to the Womb, July/August 1993 issue of Foreign Affairs

“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.” —Julius Caesar

“Today, Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true, if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond – whether real or promulgated – that threatened our very existence. It is then that all the peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing that every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished with the guarantee of their well-being, granted to them by their world government.” — Henry Kissinger, at the Bilderberg Conference in Evians, France, 1991

I wholeheartedly agree that the ‘Rothschild's control everything belief’ is an overstatement by immense proportions, they're more of a propagated pinata for the uninformed truth seeker but they still hold power. To create an internationalist framework you need an institutional framework of people across the globe, people in power with wealth able to wield the global economic system in their localities on behalf of a internationalist government. To be clear, the Rockefeller family are notorious for and admit to calling for a new economic world order. An order that will emergence from a strong BRIC alliance. This multilateral economic world order was conceived back in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. It is markedly similar to the ideology of duginism. Presently, this vision has thus far been materialized in the G20+, where it was before just the G7 operating the global agenda, moving from unipolar economic control from a USD global currency reserve to an all inclusive SDR base meaning multipolar, dedolarized economic control with the inclusion of other nations, most particularly developing nations, ie China, India, Brazil, and the majority of the BRIC countries, etc.

American plutocracy has been very complicit but they too wish to reap as much as possible while still having a chair of immense power in a USD global currency reserve so they've delayed IMF reforms and the bypass is already underway with the BRICS development bank, an IMF counterpart that will distribute SDRs. Though, the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements, as well as the majority of BRIC countries are becoming tired of U.S nonconservative imperialism, mostly advocated by dual-Israeli Zionists, a large majority of them Jewish. In fact the entire Iraq war and the ‘New Pearl Harbor’ catalyst: the WTC bombings were primarily conceived by 25 neoconservatives, the majority of them Jewish. The movement originated from Irwin Kristol, a communist and trotskyite.

Many of these government officials are reported to have held dual Israeli-US citizenship* during their tenure in Washington, DC. Included is Dick Cheny, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Peter Rodman, Elliott Abrams, Richard Armitage, Robert Zoellick, Paula Dobriansky, Richard Perle, Eliot A. Cohen, Douglas Feith, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Dov Zakheim, John Bolten, David Wurmser, Michael Chertoff, Phillip Zellikow, Jeb Bush, etc.

Here are some excerpts from their think tank documents:

“show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests.”

Of course we remember George H.W Bush calling for a New World Order on September 11th 1990, 11 years before September 11th 2001. But he would be key in shaping the circumstances needed to curtail established American principles and proceed in redirecting US foreign policy.

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

As evidenced from that statement, this was an essential key, critical point that was clearly not lost on this group. So, extreme doubt was cast as to how fast these aims could be achieved, even under a right-wing administration. They needed a powerful catalyst that would force Congress and the US public to go along with their treasonous plan for alleged US imperialism and dominance. (More on the "alleged" aspect as you read onward.)

By their own numerous admissions, they needed a new Pearl Harbor.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

We all know the International Masters of Finance are pulling the strings on this never ending war. My question: WHO or WHAT pulls their strings? Here we have, in 1998, the V.P. of UNOCAL urging the U.S. Congress to help the United Nations establish an internationally recognized government in Afghanistan so they can lay their oil pipeline. That was nearly four years ago!

"The only other possible route option is across Afghanistan, which has its own

unique challenges."

"... we have made it clear that construction of our proposed pipeline cannot begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company. " "A recent study for the World Bank states that the proposed pipeline from Central Asia across Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea would provide more favorable netbacks to oil producers... " [i.e., higher profits for the banksters] "... cannot begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan government is in place."

"We urge the Administration and the Congress to give strong support to the United Nations-led peace process in Afghanistan."

Read U.S. House of Representatives; 107th Congress, 1st Session; 1998: Testimony By: John J. Maresca; Vice President, International Relations, UNOCAL Corporation To House Committee On International Relations, Subcommittee On Asia And The Pacific February 12, 1998 Washington, D.C. In it, they covertly called for a war in Afghanistan in order to install a new puppet-leader; create a puppet government that will not impede their plan to glut the area of its vast natural resources... but HOW to start that war? How about terror in the U.S.?

But even if both pipelines were built, they would not have enough total capacity to transport all the oil expected to flow from the region in the future; nor would they have the capability to move it to the right markets. Other export pipelines must be built.

Now for the 1992 DPG neoconservative plan, which called for:

  • Huge increase in US defense spending.

  • Assertion of US lone superpower status.

  • Discourage industrial nations from challenging the US.

  • Maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors

  • Prevent emergence of regional competitors and new rivals.

  • Adopt the use of preemptive force - unprovoked warfare.

  • US should forsake multilateralism and act independently to get its own way.

  • Ability to handle two major regional contingencies at once. (SW Asia & Korea)

  • Foreign intervention in global disputes, even if not directly related to US interests.

  • Make Milstar (Military Strategic and Tactical Relay) satellite communications network top priority.

  • Show the leadership necessary to establish and protect "a new order."

In 1994, a new non-profit organization, the New Citizenship Project was formed, with political commentator William (Bill) Kristol as chairman and Gary J. Schmitt as president. It was largely funded by many private neoconservative donors and right-wing foundations. Their mission statement...

"An organization created to promote greater civic participation in our national life."

When it comes to neocon treachery, 1996 was indeed a very big year, because these same neoconservatives decided to get busy. Very busy. They formed the US Committee to Expand NATO, which later became the US Committee on NATO.)

Neoconservatives Bill Kristol and Donald Kagan co-authored a piece called "Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy," another cornerstone in their plan for complete control of US policy.

Also in 1996, another dark document was conceived and written for the IASPS, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, with dire implications for the middle east. It was entitled "A Clean Break - A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," penned by neocon co-authors David Wurmser and Richard Perle. It formed the basis for the middle east wars which would take place post-9/11.

Most have given credit to Douglas Feith, but he now denies being a "main" contributor, although admits to be consulted on the paper before its publication.

In 1997, the Project for a New American Century was finally born, the PNAC. Spawned from the skewed right-wing brain-trust of neocons who are really fascist neotrotskyites; William Kristol and Robert Kagan, their sole purpose was to form a new US policy... one that was overly aggressive and self aggrandizing, espousing the US as supreme over all. (In reality, the "supreme US" is all a ruse, which will be explained further on.)

In its founding statement of principles, just like the DPG draft, the PNAC statement called for U.S. global leadership and preemptive action, stating,

"Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership." The evidence of a clear effort to take down the US becomes even more transparent just a year later in October of '98, when yet another dark document was conceived, called "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy."

"Catastrophic Terrorism"... as a National Policy?


Well, that's exactly what the public and other government watchdogs were asking back then as well, and so guess what? All of a sudden - magically, overnight - that document suddenly had a new name... Catastrophic Terrorism: "Tackling the New Danger."

So, using our 20/20 hindsight once again, was that earlier title all just some form of eerie prescience, or was it an actual revealing preview of their true intended plans for this country?

Thinking minds shouldn't have to parse that one about for too long.

Then there was the issue of that little subtitle...

"Imagining the 'transformative event.'"

There are two key components to that title... the act of "imagining," as well as the "transformative event," the latter of which is actually two more things unto itself - something "transformative," and in the form of an "event."

Perhaps the only title more telling about its authors might have been "Daydreaming about the transformative event."

A very telling admission/concession of guilt came in the form of a later revision which shamelessly changed the subtitle to its present version, "Visions of Governance for the Twenty-First Century."

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Although, even that small revision reveals much about this group and its plans, because it blatantly spells out in its revised title, a new type of US governance is being implied.

This new policy proposal was the byproduct of yet another tiny micro-group of neoconservative men; Zionist gentile, Ashton B. Carter; Russian Zionist Jew, John Deutch, and Philip Zellikow, Jewish Zionist. At the time, only John Deutch was publicly well known as the former Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1994-95, and Director of the CIA from 1995-96. Deutch also served on the boards of directors of Citigroup, Cummins, Raytheon, and Schlumberger Ltd. Deutch is also a member of the Trilateral Commission.

Let us see what Jewish press says themselves about Zionists / Jews with Dual-Israeli citizenship occupying the U.S. Government.

From Jewish Week, July 21, 1995:

JEWISH APPOINTEES AT WHITE HOUSE [headline] An administration that already seems to be setting records for the number of Jews in high-level positions has added several more.

Lee Fisher, the former attorney general of Ohio, is President Clinton's choice as head of the National Commission on Crime Control and Prevention... [the article tells us that Fisher is: a Cleveland lawyer, played a major role in setting up hate crimes statues in Ohio; known for his effort to create partnerships between law enforcement and citizens groups; leading advocate of handgun control]

... Cheryl Halpern, to the broadcasting board of governors of the International Bureau of Broadcasting. [Halpern: was president of the Natl. Jewish Coalition; served on the executive board of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, [couldn't that be considered a conflict of interest?]the Executive Committee of the N. J. Regional Advisory Board of the A.D.L. and the Metrowest Jewish Federation] Gentiles did not scream HATE CRIMES or Discrimination! Only "special persons" do that. The Jewish Forward '95 carried an article about Jew, John Deutch's appointment as head of CIA.

As soon as he was confirmed, Deutch promptly dismissed all experienced high-ranking gentile CIA officials and replaced them with a new, all-Jewish staff: George Tenet, to CIA Deputy Director; David Cohen to Dir. Of Operations and Nora Slatkin to Executive Director... third in command of the Agency. The Forward says that Deutch and his family are holocaust survivors. His mother was the daughter of the famous Zionist, Jean Fischer, whose family were wealthy diamond merchants in Belgium. This fact connects the wealthy Deutch family both to the Zionist state of Israel and to the international Jewish diamond and banking cartel.

In February 2000, CBS-60 Minutes, aired a program about a former employee (a Jew) who was suing the CIA, alleging that he had been terminated from the CIA – singled out -- because he was a Jew. As a result of that pernicious performance, the ADL has now become an arm of the U.S. Government – a "watch dog" appointed to "observe and direct" the hiring/firing policies of (allegedly) OUR U.S. CIA! Do you understand just how far the infiltration and control of OUR government has gone and is there ANY doubt that what is in place now is a Zionist Occupied Government, a ZOG? Also from Peter Kawaja's "THE SADDEST CHAPTER OF AMERICAS HISTORY" on John Deutch, a "special person" who like Bush, took control of "our" CIA :

John Deutch now CIA Director - formerly Chemistry Professor at MIT & on the Defense Science Board which issued a secret report in 1980 urging US production of "binary" weapons.

The New York Times reported in July 1995 that on his appointment, Deutch "moved quickly to change things, Frederick Hitz [Inspector General of the Central Intelligence Agency] was the only senior official who kept his job."

Phillip Zellikow would "coincidentally" be later named as the head of the 9/11 Commission, while Ashton B. Carter would later become Secretary of Defense. The thing most damning about the Catastrophic Terrorism (CT) study was their joint speculation on what would have happened had the 1993 World Trade Center bombing brought down the twin towers...

"Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force."

The proposal then suggests:

"More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks." These members of the CT study also wrote:

"Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy is lack of imagination. An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible." "Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a before and after."

"Using imagination, we hope now to find some of the political will that we know would be there later, "after," because this nation prefers prevention to funereal reconstruction. When this threat becomes clear the President must be in a position to activate extraordinary capabilities."

This isn't a proposal as much as it is a full out plan... neocon daydreaming on how to take down the United States.

When it comes to the numerous repeated references to "Pearl Harbor," it was all very deliberate. It was literally an elaborate mass conditioning scheme, to get people to once again accept the "great lie," as they did leading to WWII.

As coincidence would have it... conspicuously enough, the $450-million dollar movie blockbuster "Pearl Harbor" was also released early that year, in May of 2001, settling the horror of Dec 7, 1941 back into the public consciousness.

Add to that, this disturbing account. According to author Barbara Honegger, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had given out literally hundreds of copies of Pearl Harbor; Warning and Decision that year, written by Rand employee Roberta Wohlstetter. It was also reported to be required reading for Rumsfeld's personal aides.

With a multi-trillion dollar War on Terror looming on the horizon, this was not a coincidence.

The PNAC set the stage and then they played it for all its worth. This group was literally the poster-child for all things non-Constitutional mayhem post 9/11, most especially the run-up to the Iraq War.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Preceding the war, key PNAC members such as Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle beat the drum for war with Iraq. According the Vanderbilt Television Archives, Wolfowitz was on 180 times to sell the war while Perle was on 187.

They were programming the American public to not only accept their ruse, but then act upon it using classical conditioning methods.

And as history shows, it seems to have worked pretty damn well.

Each of these PNAC proposals were essential pieces to the overall master plan, the takeover and dissolution of the United States, the latter of which is totally contrary to their stated principles, but as many have already figured out, the inevitable outcome of this has already been deviously engineered into the deployment of their aggressive plan, in the form of blowback and retaliation from those oppressed and infuriated by the plans eventual overall execution. Perhaps most telling of all, the PNAC website ( and the POTD website ( have both been removed from the internet. What's the old saying about having nothing to hide? Long story short folks, if you haven't figured it out by now, this was an illegal coup on the United States of America. Period. End of discussion. According to Michelle Ciarrocca and William D. Hartung's book, "Axis Of Influence: Behind the Bush Administration's Missile Defense Revival," World Policy Institute Special Report, July 2002...

"When Zakheim left the Defense Department in 1987, it was for an executive vice president post with the Virginia-based government contractor Systems Planning Corporation (SPC), which has supplied the Defense Department with military technology for several decades and has been a support contractor for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Zakheim also served as CEO at subsidiary SPC International and as a consultant for the defense contractors McDonnell Douglas (now a part of Boeing) and Northrop Grumman."

When it comes to the US neoconservative movement, there appears to be dirt from 9/11, no matter where you turn, yet, this is but only the tip of the iceberg.

Everyone gets the blame post 9/11, except for the neocons and their US and Israeli supporters who planned it all. The fact that the mainstream corporate media has said virtually nothing about this infiltration of the US government by a private neoconservative group of individuals, with foreign ties to another government, that is quite telling in itself. It tends to substantiate and corroborate allegations that the media is a disinformation and propaganda conduit of the government, supported by the ultra-wealthy powers that be. Another point of contention is the fact that this secretive group is also a key sister organization to another covert group, the Israeli organization known as IASPS, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. (Responsible for Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.) The two plans together, Rebuilding America's Defenses, and A Clean Break, both dovetail together as one plan, with a singular agenda and objective. One could rightfully suggest that there may be more than just these two uncovered plans in play. There very well could conceivably be at least two more plans, covering both the EU and Asia, but they have yet to surface in the public domain. I've said it many times over and I will keep repeating it every chance I get... The Taliban did not create the IASPS or the PNAC. Al Qaeda didn't draft the "Clean Break" document, nor the 1992 DPG, or the 2000 "Rebuilding America's Defenses" document. Isis is not the one changing US law or restricting your Constitutional rights. Our politicians did all of this to you... to all of us... and yet they themselves are but minions to the powers that be (TPTB), puppets to the uber-rich marionettes who rule this world with indifference for all but themselves. Allegedly... these neoconservative idealists did it all so that they could perpetuate their plan for US supremacy through the "New American Century," but in all reality, it's about the demise of the US, for a one-world globalist rule. That may be hard to accept, or even fathom for some, but one only needs to look at what's happened to the US post 9/11 as a result of their covert national policy changes.

This is why many of the internationalists see fit to turn to a multilateral economic order with the possible exclusion of the U.S.

The system at its present has been in development for more then three centuries now, its formations be seen in action in the late 1600s in Amsterdam which was a former financial power house in the past which aided in the removal of the Roman Catholic's influence in England(King James) with William of Orange, (ref. The Glorious Revolution). Many people hate on the world government for their engineering of economies and people, but what these people have done has been a natural state of progression towards a stable, economically egalitarian redistribution whose aim is a better quality of life for people, a state counter intuitive to the human animal because tribal feudalism is that state and its manifestations occur in things such as Financial Faux-Capitalism, where we have a short rebuff too, as to why we have democratic socialism with the plugin for capitalist markets.

As for the Rothschild's, they’re still kicking it, though, in the 1930’s the National Socialists did close down their banks for sometime:

It's true that the First National Bank was dominated by foreign owners.

Dr. Thayer Watkins of San Jose State University claims that 70 percent of the central bank was owned by foreigners, and notes that Britain was the primary source of capital for the U.S during this era. Given that the U.S. relied on British capital, and British banks were dominated by the Rothschilds, it's safe to say the family had a substantial stake in the First National Bank. Source: San Jose State University

Foreign investors, like Rothschild, dominated this bank, too.

Foreign holdings of the Second Bank of the United States grew from just under 30,000 shares in 1820 to over 84,000 shares in 1832. James de Rothschild of France was rumored to be a principal investor in the new central bank.

Source: The Second Bank of the United States, Vers Demain Journal

[–]HibikiBlack[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You still have showed zero evidence of the Rothschilds controlling any of those central banks and I already shared a wall of text explaining how the central banks use currency for evil and that they are the cause of 80% of the world's problems and how the biggest banks in the world are controlled by apprentices of the Jesuits. When it comes to the big fights between nations. The Jesuits created both Communism which they tested in Paraguay and NS. Himmler himself admitted he based the SS on the Jesuits.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Firstly, what is the evidence that someone else wrote Mein Kampf? Didn't Hitler dictate it to Hess while they were in Landsburg prison in '24?

Everyone in the prison knew they were creating their manifesto, even the guards. And if you actually read Mein Kampf, teh Stalg edition in particular, you would see that it is largely a record of Hitler's political awakening. Is there any corroboration that Staempfle did this, other than a dead man's purported claim?

Because I found the original source, written in the book, ' Paris: The Secret History of Jesuits. Unfortunately, it is the only paragraph on the page that isn't sourced, so either it is made up or we have to take the authors word for it:

The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum, only five years before, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in 'Mein Kampf were already realised; this book, an insolent challenge to the western democracies, was written by the Jesuit Father Staempfle and signed by Hitler. For—as so many ignore the fact—it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it. (p. 138)

Wikipedia does not claim that this Catholic wrote Mein Kampf. They said he might of, or partly did.

Was Rothschild an agent of the Vatican? Is Bronfmann? Did the Vatican plot to install Russian Jews in Palestine? Is the Federal Reserve Corporation owned by the Vatican or by the Rothschild group? The City of London? How about the US Congress and the White House?

Wasn't Bush guided by Sharon? Was Sharon a Vatican agent? Why does Bush study the Talmud and not his Catechism? Do you really believe that Dov Zackheim and Ari Fleischer and Michael Chertoff and John Bolten are run by some Catholic renegade? Does Bush send troops to protect the Vatican, or Israel? Did Catholics blackmail Woodrow Wilson to get the US into WWI? Did a Catholic write Germany Must Perish or the Morgenthau Plan? How about the Versailles Treaty? Were Jesuits caught dancing around during 911? Were Catholics warned to stay home that day?

Jewish popes are nothing new to the Catholic Church. We know the first ten popes were Jewish (especially St. Peter), and it is speculated that many more popes were Jewish as well...

Pope Zephyrin (199-217)

Pope Siricus (384-399)

Pope Hormidas (514-523)

Pope Analdet II (1130-1138)

Pope Callistus III (1455-1458)

Pope Alexander VI (1492-1503)

Pope Pius III (1503)

Pope Leo X (1513-1521)

Pope Clement VII (1523-1534)

Pope Paul III (1534-1549)

Pope St. Pius V (1566-1572)

Pope Gregory XIII (1572-1585)

Pope Pius XI (1922-1939)

Pope Pius XII (1939-1958)

Pope John XXIII (1958-1963)

Pope Paul VI (1963-1978)

Pope John Paul II (1978-2005) - Possibly, I believe his mother was a Katz. 

In addition to defrauding confused lapsing Catholics, these pseudo-Churchmen are literally engaging in all sorts of murder and mayhem. They are practicing sodomy, the second of the 4 abominations; and they are starting to openly endorse it in California.

And know that I'm not saying the Jews are doing this. Because all of these actions are from apostates, Jewish or Catholic.

Do I need to remind you that you cannot hold office in an organization that has kicked you out? That the clerical penalty for heresy, murder, and moral turpitude are automatic loss of office, due to automatic excommunication?

As Bella Dodd said during her testimony before the US Congress in the 1950s, hundreds of Communists infiltrated the Catholic Church. They intended to destroy the Church from within and build a new Church, one that appeared Catholic, but was not in actual substance Catholic.

As the mystic Catherine Emmerich predicted, they have created a false Church. She said that we ought to pray that God will drive them out of Rome. Let us pray that He will do so.

And I'm going to post a post on the Jesuits and how many of them are Jews with a supremacy agenda. At least many of the modern jesuits are, after WW2. Jesuits even promote Futurism something Chrsitianity would never preach.