all 10 comments

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Tfw the rulers of mankind are too stupid now to use the media for brainwashing the people like they used to do for every war before. Idiocracy indeed.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The time of inbreeding too long...

[–]HopeThatHalps 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Answer me this, then. What do we do to prevent China, Russia or whoever from choosing our elected officials when they hoard opposition research, and then use some intermediary to disseminate the information a few days before the election? Something has to be said for when and where information comes from. The statement from the ACLU pretends none of that is worth considering in this case, or any case.

[–]bablarb 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Whoever publishes Truthful information should be thanked. They help inform and educate the public and thus strengthen our democracy.

I personally couldn't care less who provided the info, as long as it's 100% authentic, which it was.

Makes me wonder: Are you angry the voters were made aware of the DNC rigging the nomination in 2016?

[–]HopeThatHalps 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What if it wasn't truthful?

[–]Juba 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are bringing in assange to vitness against Clinton, they are just using these charges as a cover.

Why do you think sweden aka deep state central is trying to reopen the fake rape charges at the same time??

Sweden is the most Clinton/soros loyal country in the world. They are so brainwashed here that +90% still think trump is whatever msm says.

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm surprised the ACLU is covering this like they are. I'd read someone postulating on what the deal was with Assange, and Manning; they were of the opinion that the manner in which Assange did something for Manning, that it was indeed illegal.

Aside from that, on my own level of belief, I think anyone who releases proof of crimes, in any manner, shouldn't be made an example of.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

which Country?

[–]AllTrumpDoesIsWin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are a variety of Constitutional issues with the Espionage Act, and far too few of them have been properly explored in case law. I welcome the charges against Assange, it is useful to compel the judiciary to weigh-in on these matters.