Is it Anti-Semitic to Point Out That Well Over 50% of The Bolshevik Government Was Jewish?

submitted by Jesus from self.conspiracy

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Also, Albert Einstein looks to have 'gained' his 'brilliance' from stealing other's ideas in the patent office.

I take issue with this. Relativity isn't patentable. It just isn't one of those things you can patent. You can patent inventions and techniques, but neither theories of relativity were either of these.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Look into the controversies before you open you mouth. Stop shooting it off.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've looked into them before. I concluded that he probably didn't steal it (but he's dead now so it doesn't really matter) sometime circa 2013, and as far as I can tell no new evidence has come to light since.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

it doesn't really matter

Yet you keep fucking spouting off.

[–]HeyImSancho 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Did I mention relativity?

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Did he do anything else noteworthy? (Apart from QM, etc.. Something that actually could've been stolen from a patent office.)

[–]HeyImSancho 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

A few papers, a bomb, not sure, but not just relativity. My single only point with my post, was colloquially,'if people see smoke, then they expect fire'; why shouldn't they investigate?

Meaning, the list in the OP does show a strong percentages of Jews holding the majority of power often; when looking at their global population numbers, there's a compelling difference. Majority of power, held within a minority of people(by numbers). Common sense would at least say, 'look, and beg the question why?'.

The average Jew, proud of being what they are, do brag, who wouldn't? Does it mean anything, or not? I don't know, don't care, I see the average person needing to make change on their own level; in this regard, the second man in the 'tango dance'(mentioned in earlier post) is always the 'mark'; meaning that each of us can make critical changes, to foment the change. After all, there'll always be someone to blame; no matter the amount of silly 'debate logic' read, will change this fact.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Complete tangent; don't take this as continuing the discussion please. If anyone wants to continue the discussion on the topic, please reply to the above comment.

there'll always be someone to blame;

Three engineers are working through a checklist for the ocean bridge four architects have designed. This checklist was written by an insert job title here, who consulted seismologists, pedologists and local safety regulations in ensuring that it covers everything. The engineers determine that the bridge meets all the requirements they've been given to sufficient tolerance, and hand it off to the bridge builders. They put the bridge together as the specification demands over the course of 38 months. (It's a big bridge.)

Seven years later, after a large earthquake, the bridge collapses, killing 47 and injuring around 350. It's difficult to discern what the problem was, but it appears that by the time of the collapse the foundations were no longer supporting the bridge.

Who's to blame?

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm not an actuary, lawyer, judge, or jury ;-)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If anyone wants to continue the discussion on the topic, please reply to the above comment.

A formally declared Forum slide inserted above? Hilarious.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But you still think there's somebody to blame? Each individual person did their job right, and the people who designed the system didn't design a flawed system. The world just turned out not to work the way they expected, and their bridge fell down.

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

'but you still think there's somebody to blame?' Someone always does.

'Each individual person did their job right, and the people who designed the system didn't design a flawed system. The world just turned out not to work the way they expected, and their bridge fell down.' was there loss? If so then there's always someone to blame; ask a lawyer.

Wizz, the responses above, I can give all day long; while you, and others that are here for varying purposes of I guess 'reform', one thing you'll never be able to change is the organic nature of the world. Meaning, when you think you've got it all figured out, it still comes back to bite you in the butt in a way that's usually humbling. To put that into the spin on the bridge, I comprehended from the get go what your point was, but at the same time, you proved mine too.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

but at the same time, you proved mine too.

That's really the measure of a good point, isn't it? I'll have to go away and think about that.