you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EndlessSunflowers 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I'd be interested to hear him say more about why he thinks that. I'm a big time supporter of Julian Assange (and Truth!) but I can also see 9/11 was orchestrated to start more u.s. wars, and pass the patriot act, etc, etc - all anyone has to do is follow the money to see that the shady U.S. Vice President at the time made $50 Billion off that situation, Hmmm...

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem with Chenyy, is he probably didn't plan the world trade center demolition, but he was a co-signee on Project for a New America Centuries think tank document, 'Rebuilding America's Defenses' (called for a significant increase in military and defense spending), which was created by William Kristol and the neoconservative Kagans, including Robert. Both are pro-Israel ZIonists' the former, Kristol, the son of Irwin Kristol, a Trotskyite. Irwin admits to being the creator of the neoconservative movement. Cheney made billions off of Halliburton and many people like him benefited off the false flag. However, Hollywoo, like the new Cheney film and most other ZIonsit documentaries suggest he was behind the WMD fiasco and all the war propaganda that followed. He might of been but he wasn't the planner.

The only thing I can find is a connection to Austrian art students using fuses holders that happened to be created by a halliburton front company. Geletin (Blasting Geletin for demolitions), the B-thing (Bomb?), and E-Team (Explosive Team?) were teh names of these Austrian Art Students, likely working with Mossad, as Mossad and Austrian Intelligence, even more secret than Mossad work closely together.

That being said it was likely Mossad and Israeli intelligence that planned this event. Christopher Bollyn's book is a great start and then jsut read around. Everywhere you look you'll see a dual-Israeli or ZIonist behind this event.

Of course David Rockefeller who was a primary capital investor for the complex had a hand too. He even said in his 1998 book that the towers would conduct their 'Dissapearign Act."

P.S: That new Cheney film is produced by a pro-Zionist producer. Who gave millions in dollars to Israeli arms and defnse contractors.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Webster Tarpley claims that Assange is a limited hangout.

JA is "provided" with classified documents from various sources, which may or may not be legit.

The Arab Spring (a Wikileaks inspired movement) turned out to be a disaster for almost every nation that was involved. IIRC only Tunisia had any limited progress. Every other involved nation has turned into a charnal house. Particularly, Libya, Egypt, and Syria.
It's an interesting coincidence that every one of the Arab Spring countries that has opposed the actions of Israel at some point is currently in ruins. Does anyone think this is a coincidence?
The Arab Spring was probably an organized event (in hindsight).

I don't know if JA is legit.

He may be an idealistic pawn (willing, or unwitting).
However, he has an acute understanding of geopolitics and is certainly no dummy.
Either he feels 9/11 is an issue of lesser import, and a general distraction to the glory of his work, or he has been influenced and supported by some agency.

He's a well informed individual. I suspect the latter.

I am glad that he published the "leaked DNC e-mails" which were provided by the late (murdered) Seth Rich. Seth Rich is a hero.
To his credit JA did indicate that his murder was related to the DNC leaks.

I think JA has integrity for the issues that he values. He's certainly sacrificed a great deal more than most would be willing to endure.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Watch the interview of Seth Riche's family. Tell me if you think they're legit. They read off of a script and are laughing too. How do you even know if he, Seth Rich leaked the emails? Do you know for sure?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

JA rarely discussed specifics about sources (look carefully for the subtle nod).

Julian Assange on Seth Rich

Really, there's no way to be 100% certain. However, this appears to be the most probable conclusion; absent of any other evidence. IMO...

Also, how could his family know for certain? IIRC they filed a lawsuit against the DNC, or some similar action.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

he had been a "hacker" in the 90s, then disappeared until he resurfaced with wikileaks in 2006. Who knows what he was doing in intervening years where a lot happened including 9/11.

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably developed as a controlled opposition. You need to give the people what they want, OUR TRUTH, with a little disinfo. We give you your heros.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Done, this sounds similarly dismissive to me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG23AyiIObk

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yup, it is obvious he's cointelpro. He mentions how relevant Gulf of Tonkin is, or how the newly released JFK documents are intriguing but when asked a simple, straight forward question about 9/11 he double speaks. His body language tells it all. After stumbling with his words he managed to stutter out the possibility of Saudi involvement then seemed to develop a slight paralysis of his throat and stammered and yammered about possible other states, while itching his chest and pulling at his collar, but could not bring himself to say more on the issue only to say it was 'no longer so important' as there were more recent events requiring our attention.

The elephant in the room could have shat on his head but he would pretend not to notice it, but maybe blink a lot...

Either, he was nervous in answering that question out of fear or nervous in revealing himself as a cointelpro. If you learn micro-expressions Assange clearly is hiding something.

[–]swordofdamocles42 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

hey thanks, i had not seen this. he squirmed like a worm on a hook.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaUSerKvJYE

wikileaks is poison