Anonymous Message To The Captors Of Julian Assange

submitted by salvia_d from youtu.be

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

the anonymous are not ethical hackers, but a wealthy foundation sponsoring globalist ngos such as amnesty international along the likes of soros's open society foundation or the big tax exempt foundations such as the ford foundation. its just a propaganda op of the deep state, one of the many. a dirty psyop. the people blindly buying into their propaganda should do some research.

here they are, a foundation http://anonymous.foundation/

The Anonymous Foundation exists in an effort to facilitate the Anonymous Collective in its humanitarian operations and campaigns by providing support, resources and financial donations.

and here they are sponsoring amnesty international with $667.000 https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/FIN4076912017ENGLISH.PDF

i didnt know ethical hacking is so profitable! /s

the reason they created the hollywood (pedowood) movie 'v for vendetta' is to invert history and portray themselves as the good guys who are fighting the 'evil system'.

but in reality the jesuits were behind the counter-reformation, the subversion of trent, and the gunpowder plot against king james. king james was their enemy for translating the bible into english, keeping england out of the 30-years religious war that ruined continental europe, and avoiding war with the spanish. iow king jame was a pacifist. the jesuit are THE war mongers even today. the jesuits are promoting the 5th of november as a holiday in england today, using the popularity of their 'v for vendetta' movie. their guy (guido) fawkes mask also makes the idea popular.

[–]wizzwizz4 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

Why are you going on about 400-year-old events and scapegoating Jesuits all the time?

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

because they deserve it. duh

[–]wizzwizz4 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

If they "deserve it", you don't need to scapegoat them…

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

yes i do. they deserve it.

[–]wizzwizz4 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

2. Someone punished for the error or errors of someone else.

— Wiktionary

Before I go any further, can I get you to recite the Litany of Tarski? It's OK if not; I haven't been able to honestly recite it yet.

In this case, it goes something like this:

If Jesuits are to blame,
I desire to believe that Jesuits are to blame;
If Jesuits are not to blame,
I desire to believe that Jesuits are not to blame;
Let me not become attached to beliefs I may not want.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

interesting, yeah no problem. but, all my research points at the jesuits and the sabbatean frankists and if we go back further in time, middle eastern sufi sects such as the nizari ismaili assassins from alamut in iran/afghanistan represented today by aga khan... and other gnostic sects... in a word, you seem to think my convictions are faith based convictions. thats a mistake.

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Everyone believes things. Everything is faith-based. Your faith might be supported with substantial evidence, but mine is supported by meagre evidence and Occam's Razor.

And I think I've just discovered one of my implicit biases: I don't care who's responsible for things, if I can make it stop. Feel free to work around that if you do take on the fool's errand of trying to convince me of something; I'll try to listen if you do. (Though I'll want sources, not blogs and YouTube videos like so many people keep calling evidence.)

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

otoh when i tell people the source is a book they often freak out. aint nobody got time for that

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I've got more time for books than blogs. Try me.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What about The Venetians? Check out Webster Tarpley for more.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

i think what he says, fits. 1200 ad was still the age of the crusades and the time when the templars introduced international banking to the west. they were influenced by sufism and kabbalah which explains their no soul and dead soul ideas, we know newton was more into alchemy than real science, so if his research is solid, he might be on the right track. but the venetians are only one of the vectors. they are also the templars in portugal, with their marranos, who ran the santa maria, the bankers and mercenaries in switzerland, the bankers in cyprus, the jesuits, the teutonic knights, and then there are the sabbateans, the frankists, to say nothing of the bektashi. these all exist and function today.

for example, i like attacking aoc, because she is a marrano.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Webster Tarpley gave good lecture(s?) on The Venetians (Jews) infiltrating the UK establishment, including the Gunpowder Plot, and creating the 100 Years War thus allowing Venice to wage war on Rome while the rest of Europe was at war, among other things.