you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

its just what you think

and i think somethin else; on one hand we have ja who is a limited hangout and controlled opposition (see 'wikileaks: created by nsa) and on the other, a jesuit propaganda psyop, anonymous. now, as they are playing their game, you are doing a hook, line and sinker.

and whitewashing them, playing a role of a jesuit apologist.

seeing how the oss/cia was created by knights of malta, its a certainty that the nsa is also their agency, closing the circuit of deception with wikileaks, assange and anonymous.

note, both the jesuits and the knights of malta are templar military orders, with the jesuits being the top dog.

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Quoting yourself, are we?

Look, I know that you're not as bad as good ol' Martin. You are actually trying to communicate, aren't running a sock army, etc.. But when it gets to certain topics, you completely shut down just the same as him, and take on the role of "preacher" to the point where some of your comments aren't even coherent.

Tackle it one thing at a time.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

aren't even coherent.

for example?

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

seeing how the oss/cia was created by knights of malta, its a certainty that the nsa is also their agency, closing the circuit of deception with wikileaks, assange and anonymous.

Even assuming your premises, you're jumping to a lot of conclusions there. And what's a "circuit of deception"? Your sentence is grammatically correct, but has very little meaning.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

a lot of conclusions there

well be precise, then. which ones?

very little meaning.

<- anonymous <- jesuits -> nsa -> wikileaks -> assange

the extreme left arrow points at assange as we can witness by this post.. this is a circuit. whether you can grasp it or not.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

A circuit requires a cyclic graph to represent it. This is an acyclic graph. But I see where you're coming from.

Though you still haven't demonstrated that the OSS/CIA being created by the Knights of Malta (assuming that's true) means that the Jesuits control the NSA.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

https://moversandshakersofthesmom.blogspot.com/2008/08/bill-donovan.html

http://www.voxfux.com/features/knightsofmalta.html

note, also allen dulles was one.

bonus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Joseph_Bonaparte founded the fbi.

he was the grand nephew of napoleon bonaparte, the illuminati puppet. the bavarian illuminati is a jesuit creation.

homework for you: look up the condom dispute and how the jesuit bergoglio took over the knights of malta just recently

you must be thinking the nsa is run by the mormons or something :-)

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

How is this because of the Knights of Malta supposedly creating the OSS/CIA?

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

these agencies - the fbi and the cia - are the fundamental pieces of the us intelligence network. everything else follows from them. things dont exist in a vacuum.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Ok. That kind of makes sense.

Yeah, you're definitely not as bad as Martin Timothy; you're actually explaining yourself. As such, I've got a chance of convincing you, and you've got a chance of convincing me.