all 46 comments

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

What kind of cyber-protests would actually help and how can we contribute?

[–]HopeThatHalps 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Cringeworthy, overly verbose, and sounds like it was written by a teenaged edgelord.

[–]toxic_masculinity 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

anonymous was a 4chan scene the feds dismantled years ago. Look up sabu.

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]useless_aether 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

the anonymous are not ethical hackers, but a wealthy foundation sponsoring globalist ngos such as amnesty international along the likes of soros's open society foundation or the big tax exempt foundations such as the ford foundation. its just a propaganda op of the deep state, one of the many. a dirty psyop. the people blindly buying into their propaganda should do some research.

here they are, a foundation http://anonymous.foundation/

The Anonymous Foundation exists in an effort to facilitate the Anonymous Collective in its humanitarian operations and campaigns by providing support, resources and financial donations.

and here they are sponsoring amnesty international with $667.000 https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/FIN4076912017ENGLISH.PDF

i didnt know ethical hacking is so profitable! /s

the reason they created the hollywood (pedowood) movie 'v for vendetta' is to invert history and portray themselves as the good guys who are fighting the 'evil system'.

but in reality the jesuits were behind the counter-reformation, the subversion of trent, and the gunpowder plot against king james. king james was their enemy for translating the bible into english, keeping england out of the 30-years religious war that ruined continental europe, and avoiding war with the spanish. iow king jame was a pacifist. the jesuit are THE war mongers even today. the jesuits are promoting the 5th of november as a holiday in england today, using the popularity of their 'v for vendetta' movie. their guy (guido) fawkes mask also makes the idea popular.

[–]wizzwizz4 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

Why are you going on about 400-year-old events and scapegoating Jesuits all the time?

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

because they deserve it. duh

[–]wizzwizz4 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

If they "deserve it", you don't need to scapegoat them…

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

yes i do. they deserve it.

[–]wizzwizz4 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

2. Someone punished for the error or errors of someone else.

Wiktionary

Before I go any further, can I get you to recite the Litany of Tarski? It's OK if not; I haven't been able to honestly recite it yet.

In this case, it goes something like this:

If Jesuits are to blame,
I desire to believe that Jesuits are to blame;
If Jesuits are not to blame,
I desire to believe that Jesuits are not to blame;
Let me not become attached to beliefs I may not want.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

interesting, yeah no problem. but, all my research points at the jesuits and the sabbatean frankists and if we go back further in time, middle eastern sufi sects such as the nizari ismaili assassins from alamut in iran/afghanistan represented today by aga khan... and other gnostic sects... in a word, you seem to think my convictions are faith based convictions. thats a mistake.

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Everyone believes things. Everything is faith-based. Your faith might be supported with substantial evidence, but mine is supported by meagre evidence and Occam's Razor.

And I think I've just discovered one of my implicit biases: I don't care who's responsible for things, if I can make it stop. Feel free to work around that if you do take on the fool's errand of trying to convince me of something; I'll try to listen if you do. (Though I'll want sources, not blogs and YouTube videos like so many people keep calling evidence.)

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

otoh when i tell people the source is a book they often freak out. aint nobody got time for that

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I've got more time for books than blogs. Try me.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What about The Venetians? Check out Webster Tarpley for more.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

i think what he says, fits. 1200 ad was still the age of the crusades and the time when the templars introduced international banking to the west. they were influenced by sufism and kabbalah which explains their no soul and dead soul ideas, we know newton was more into alchemy than real science, so if his research is solid, he might be on the right track. but the venetians are only one of the vectors. they are also the templars in portugal, with their marranos, who ran the santa maria, the bankers and mercenaries in switzerland, the bankers in cyprus, the jesuits, the teutonic knights, and then there are the sabbateans, the frankists, to say nothing of the bektashi. these all exist and function today.

for example, i like attacking aoc, because she is a marrano.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Webster Tarpley gave good lecture(s?) on The Venetians (Jews) infiltrating the UK establishment, including the Gunpowder Plot, and creating the 100 Years War thus allowing Venice to wage war on Rome while the rest of Europe was at war, among other things.

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (23 children)

the anonymouss is a jesuit front. the gunpowder plot was done by the jesuits.

[–]wizzwizz4 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

The Gunpowder Plot was a contentious event surrounded by mystery and intrigue, from which it's unclear who stood to profit and who profited, around which was spun a net of propaganda to condemn Catholics in the eyes of the English population.

414 years ago. It isn't relevant in the slightest.

You're sounding a bit too much like a Martin Timothy for comfort.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

its just what you think, but failed to provide any sources. therefore you sound like a ultraliberal jesuit to me. also how relevant it is in your eyes means not all that much, because they are still in control today. they didnt fade away in the mysterious past as you would like us to believe. guy fawkes real name was guido and it is also known as the jesuit plot. hmm, wonder why?

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Perhaps because it was ordered by Jesuits? Or maybe it was centuries-old Stuart propaganda. Who knows?

More importantly, how is it relevant to a purported member of Anonymous talking about Julian Assange‽ It's as remote from modern-day politics as any other four-century-old event. More so than some, in fact.

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

its just what you think

and i think somethin else; on one hand we have ja who is a limited hangout and controlled opposition (see 'wikileaks: created by nsa) and on the other, a jesuit propaganda psyop, anonymous. now, as they are playing their game, you are doing a hook, line and sinker.

and whitewashing them, playing a role of a jesuit apologist.

seeing how the oss/cia was created by knights of malta, its a certainty that the nsa is also their agency, closing the circuit of deception with wikileaks, assange and anonymous.

note, both the jesuits and the knights of malta are templar military orders, with the jesuits being the top dog.

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Quoting yourself, are we?

Look, I know that you're not as bad as good ol' Martin. You are actually trying to communicate, aren't running a sock army, etc.. But when it gets to certain topics, you completely shut down just the same as him, and take on the role of "preacher" to the point where some of your comments aren't even coherent.

Tackle it one thing at a time.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

aren't even coherent.

for example?

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

seeing how the oss/cia was created by knights of malta, its a certainty that the nsa is also their agency, closing the circuit of deception with wikileaks, assange and anonymous.

Even assuming your premises, you're jumping to a lot of conclusions there. And what's a "circuit of deception"? Your sentence is grammatically correct, but has very little meaning.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

a lot of conclusions there

well be precise, then. which ones?

very little meaning.

<- anonymous <- jesuits -> nsa -> wikileaks -> assange

the extreme left arrow points at assange as we can witness by this post.. this is a circuit. whether you can grasp it or not.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

A circuit requires a cyclic graph to represent it. This is an acyclic graph. But I see where you're coming from.

Though you still haven't demonstrated that the OSS/CIA being created by the Knights of Malta (assuming that's true) means that the Jesuits control the NSA.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The first half of the first comment might be relevant. The rest is completely irrelevant.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You're sounding a bit too much like a Martin Timothy for comfort.

mt is notorious for blaming the jews for everything. that is not the case with me. please top spreading disinfo.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

mt is notorious for blaming the jews for everything. that is not the case with me.

No, you're blaming the Jews Jesuits for everything. Big difference.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

it is a big difference

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Is it? Give one argument for it being different, other than:

  • It's not antisemitic.
  • It's not about the Holocaust.
  • But Jesuits are really running the world.

If you succeed, I'll drop it.

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

simple,its the truth

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for your honesty.

[–]JohnnyMongrel 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

weird

[–]Kenny 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

lol wtf, this is like the hollywood interpretation of Anonymous. the cheap filter and the 5 USD mask from walmart are priceless

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

SO, stupid, ANON is a honeypot, limited hangout operation, jsut liek Assange.

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Gunpowder Plot was a failed attempt to blow up England’s King James I (1566-1625) and the Parliament on November 5, 1605. The plot was organized by Robert Catesby (c.1572-1605) in an effort to end the persecution of Roman Catholics by the English government. Catesby and others hoped to replace the country’s Protestant government with Catholic leadership.

https://www.history.com/topics/british-history/gunpowder-plot

The Gunpowder Plot of 1605, in earlier centuries often called the Gunpowder Treason Plot or the Jesuit Treason, was a failed assassination attempt against King James I by a group of provincial English Catholics led by Robert Catesby.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_Plot

Gunpowder Plot, the conspiracy of English Roman Catholics to blow up Parliament and King James I, his queen, and his eldest son on November 5, 1605. The leader of the plot, Robert Catesby, together with his four coconspirators—Thomas Winter, Thomas Percy, John Wright, and Guy Fawkes—were zealous Roman Catholics angered by James’s refusal to grant more religious toleration to Catholics.

The Jesuits Oswald Tesimond (also known by the alias Father Greenway) and Father Henry Garnet were also cognizant of the plot.

https://www.britannica.com/event/Gunpowder-Plot