😑 That's all I have to say; teachers were struck with air pellets during a school shooting drill at an Indiana elementary school, they were left bleeding and with bruises when it was over, says the executive director of a teacher's association.

submitted by Jesus from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheParanoidAndroid 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Ya wtf, how does this teach anyone, anything? Maybe some sort of publicity stunt to say " see, this why arming teachers is a good idea"

[–]cmdrrockawesome 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Or maybe that sheriff is just a freaking loon. I've seen plenty of injuries from airsoft guns. That's why you wear protective gear (or at least you're supposed to) when you are shooting at each other with them. That shit can hurt.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

“During active shooter drill, four teachers at a time were taken into a room, told to crouch down and were shot execution style with some sort of projectiles - resulting in injuries to the extent that welts appeared, and blood was drawn.”

I MEAN COOOOME ON

It's a fake story. The media is giving you a reason to look into the fake PSYOP shooting frenzy. They want you to know. That way they don't feel complicit in the blame of fraud and conspiracy.

[–]cmdrrockawesome 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Do you have any proof that it's fake? I mean besides your intuition?

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Only my intuition and the past PSYOP shootings. There's no evidence this happened, that I can find. Just because the media writies that something happened doesnt mean it did. They can legally lie to you. I don't have any reason to lie.

[–]cmdrrockawesome 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

And I have no reason to believe you without proof. You say I should put on my critical thinking cap, but without some solid proof all you're slinging is the ramblings of a crazy conspiracy theorist.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're right. I sent some videos for you to watch. It is true, the level of U.S. Government disinfo is alarming, ubiquitous and pervasive. The disinfo is used to shape public opinion "Wag the Dog" style.

This may come as a surprise to you but since 2012 the U.S. Government is allowed to legally lie to the American public. They were given that power in the Smith-Mundt Nazification "Modernization" Act of 2012. The Act allows the US Government to stage hoaxes and pass them off as real in the MSM with the goal of influencing public opinion for covert geopolitical, social, socioeconomic and legislative agendas.

1) The number of mass shootings miraculously sky rocketed immediately after Smith-Mundt 2012 was passed.

https://i.imgur.com/33Loqg7.png

The legislation was passed just below the arrow with Newtown written in it.

And to put that graph into perspective it might be much larger than that, according to many of the media's figures. This is even more concerning but makes plenty of sense once you take into account the Smith Mundt Modernization Act of 2012.

Take into account the video I sent you of the actors and criminals used in interviews for all thesee shootings. I would ask you to, if you ever have the time, NOT to believe the media jsut because they write something or tell you but to research who the people are they are interviewing.

For reference, I have found on numerous times, the media to intentionally mispell their names and outright lie about who they are, only to fidn out the people are actors or criminals out on high bonds, doign dirty work for the state.

The Smith-Mundt "Modernization" Act of 2012 legalized Domestic Propaganda. It was passed by Obama so the Left could better control the narrative because sending paid shills into Internet chat rooms wasn't working.

Smith-Mundt is something right out of Nazi Germany. It employs a propaganda technique Joseph Goebbels refined from the English called "The Big Lie" which boils down to this:

"If you make a lie big enough and keep repeating it people will eventually believe it."

You might ask, "how could peopel participate in such fraud on the American people to induce fear?"

Well, watch the video. The media and DoD use pretty shady folks, most of them criminals. They then set up gofundme accounts and aquire thousands if not millions of dolalrs for their participation in the fraud. Nobody gets hurt or dies, so the guilt of participation is minimal. They also must sign national security clauses anyway, makign it treasonous to speak out against their doing. I gave you the videos that UK critical thinker has created. He's a nice individual who really gets into the details of these events unlile disinfo agents. God bless and all the best!

[–]cmdrrockawesome 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

A few things. Firstly, I don't believe things merely because they're reported by the media. Especially now-a-days. What was once an industry that prided itself on investigation and diligence has devolved into (for the most part) stenographers whose only concern is to break a story before their competition to drive the clicks and likes.

Secondly, the "media" is nebulous and vague. Who are we talking about? Network news? All newspapers and magazines? Blogs? Citizen journalists? All of them? Only some of them? Large-scale conspiracies are the hardest to prove and the least believable because they usually rely on hundreds, if not thousands of people (or more) being in on the scam and keeping quiet about it. In this modern age of ever-present recording and the ability of the average citizen to broadcast information to literally the entire world, I highly doubt a cabal of this magnitude could stay hidden for long, if at all.

The school/mass shooting numbers are suspect too. I honestly believe the uptick can be attributed to the increased interconnectivity of everyone in America and the world. These shootings get massive publicity. This can and does lead to copycat incidents. I think the increase can also be because of the way we define these shootings. The definition changes all the time. What is and isn't a mass shooting is a matter of debate, and one organization's definition might not be the same as another's.

What's the goal? To disarm people in America? I doubt that will ever happen. What would be the benefit? As much of a gun rights advocate that I am, realistically, if average American citizens were put into direct armed conflict with the military, they wouldn't stand a chance. That's the reality.

Are you saying the government and/or military are attempting a coup? Of the nation they already control? That makes no sense. What is the end game?

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The devolution and demoralization has not only broken down the callable diligence of investigative free-lance journalism but it has established a hierarchy of media conglomerates with virtuously the same geopolitical and socioeconomic ideologues. A mere six corporations control all national news outlets as well as many digital faux-alternative outlets. Five of the six companies are owned by Zionist Jews, according to their 2013 records. The six is owned by Rupert Murdoch, a self-confessed Zionist. The smaller fish in the sea take their place in that hierarchy and report as their told. On a national level the scripts are handed down to them through Reuters and the Associated Press.

Secondly, the "media" is nebulous and vague. Who are we talking about? Network news?

We are talking about the industry of corporate mass media that is backed by billions of dollars in asset/share holding and investment money; those media conglomerates whether, international, national or local. Though, I do not espouse that all of media is involved in the scheme of ‘broadcast shareholders ideology over truth’; even local media and faux-alternative media outlets unknowingly or knowingly perpetuate deception and propaganda. How?

Through the breaking of a story before their competition to drive the clicks and likes.

As well as repeating, regurgitating and reporting what the higher-ups have scripted.

That being said, the industry of mass media is an echo chamber where you need to toe the line or get booted. Stray to far, such as question the official narrative of 9/11, even if your approach is of an investigative journalist, you’ll still be demoted and likely fired. I’m under the belief that the official narrative of 9/11 is one big lie. Hence, my belief that the largest news agencies are and were complicit in the cover-up by not investigating the matter and outright lying on many occasions.

Large-scale conspiracies are the hardest to prove and the least believable to believe but they are not the hardest to keep secret. Like I have stated before, the bigger the lie, the more people will believe it. You make the false assumption that hundreds if not thousands have to be in on the deception campaign. That just isn’t the case, although it was the case when it came to the Manhattan Project. So, then, how can hundreds of PSYOP participants or those working under the power structure of the media conglomerates stay silent and perpetuate this deception. One way is through ignorance, but the most likely way is compartmentalization. People participate on a need to know basis. Take the pyramid structure of ABC’s departments, NASA, the CIA, the KGB, etc,. When everyone is on a need to know basis and the structure is set up in a way that clearance determines what you can and can not know, then the method of compartmentalization makes perfect sense. To avoid cognitive dissonance, or conflicting values, cognitions, emotions, beliefs, etc. within themselves. Compartmentalization allows these conflicting ideas to co-exist by inhibiting direct or explicit acknowledgement and interaction between separate compartmentalized self-states. This is how grand conspiracies can exist without everyone being in on it.

I highly doubt a cabal of this magnitude could stay hidden for long, if at all.

It doesn’t. The eyes can not see what the mind does not want to know. Again, watch UK critical thinkers videos and take into account compartmentalization. I suggest this, because they; the powers that be are not hiding their agenda. Much of their theatrical dirty work and PSYOP’s are so obvious, with plenty of plot holes that it becomes quite laughable. That’s if you take the time to research these events in their entirety. That means looking up birth records, mugshots, police reports, and calling the participants, which we, I say we because there was a group of us, all of whom are now censored and banned from many content creator sites that exposed these PSYOP’s and frauds by catching them in lies.

I linked some videos regarding the Santa Fe Shooting, Parkland, and many others. These videos are not inflammatory at all. They do not even come to any conclusions, that’s the great thing about UK and ssdavis75 as well as many others now banned from most of the Internet. They just take what was broadcasted by the media, the Police and the Courts and try to fit it in a time line that makes sense. You’ll realize that once you accept that SOME events reported by the media are faked and staged, which they are now legally allowed to do (why create a law to make this legal, if they do not do it?), logic will inexorably lead you to the fact that many of them are. The character of a true story is altogether different than that of a fabricated one; this is a juxtaposition to be avoided at all cost.

I posted more below >>>>>>>>>

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Concerning Psychological Operations, and the use of compartmentalization

Large-scale conspiracies are the hardest to prove and the least believable because they usually rely on hundreds, if not thousands of people (or more) being in on the scam and keeping quiet about it. In this modern age of ever-present recording and the ability of the average citizen to broadcast information to literally the entire world, I highly doubt a cabal of this magnitude could stay hidden for long, if at all.

The school/mass shooting numbers are suspect too. I honestly believe the uptick can be attributed to the increased interconnectivity of everyone in America and the world. These shootings get massive publicity. This can and does lead to copycat incidents.

This is understandable but researching many of these high profile shootings and the corresponding drills associated with them, that and the eye-witness accounts, the conflicting story lines, the psychology of ‘duping delight’, the hundreds of millions garnered on gofundme, the conflicting police, court and eye-witness accounts, etc,. It makes plenty of sense to me and I think it will to you once you take the time and watch some of UK’s videos and Steven Davis’s:

https://153news.net/view_channel.php?user=ssdavis75#user-playlist

https://153news.net/view_channel.php?user=UK%20Critical%20Thinker

The charts and data I have researched on the statistics of mass shootings and how it is defined have changed but the many I’ve looked up STILL DO show a staggering increase AFTER the signing of the Smith Mundt Modernization Act. There really wasn’t a drastic cultural change but there was a drastic legislative change which allowed domestic propaganda. As I understand it, 4 people dead in close proximity by a person or person(s) with a gun is considered a mass shooting, anti-gun advocates have changed this definition. Nevertheless, mass shootings with more than 4 killed has decreased since the 1990's yet high profile school shooting with 5, 10, a dozen killed has increased significantly and in close relationship with the passing of the Smith Mundt Modernization Act of 2012.

What's the goal? To disarm people in America? I doubt that will ever happen.

If it is a long term goal used with idealogical subversion or the poisoning of the minds of the younger generations through fear, than yes, disarmament which is a goal of certain politicians and especially the united nations is desired. Though, they need an international police force stationed in the US to completely confiscate, which would only be considered if say there was a massive economic collapse. There are 1960’s through present day UN disarmament books showing how they'd disarm civilian population as well as advocating for US civilian disarmament in the US. The UN’s small Arms Treaty was vetoed by congress but the Obama administration tried to fastrack it.

As much of a gun rights advocate that I am, realistically, if average American citizens were put into direct armed conflict with the military, they wouldn't stand a chance. That's the reality.

if freedom of speech applies to the Internet freedom of religion applies to Mormonism (founded in the 1820s), and freedom from warrantless search and seizure applies to your cell phone, then the right of the people (this is the key phrase in the 2A that makes it crystal-clear what they are talking about) to keep and bear arms must apply to modern weapons. I’m not only a big gun supporter but I also believe those responsible should have the right to keep automatic rifles.

Aside from the fact that repeating and automatic weapons DID exist when the Constitution was written, the founding fathers (many of whom you may recall were famous and celebrated inventors) absolutely understood that there would be technological advances over time. The state knows that if the citizens, legally can not own automatic rifles or those use by the military than the 2nd amendment needs not applies to them. Hence, why they are trying to ban the low hanging fruit, the AR-15 with these past PSYOP shootings. It’s always the AR-15, even though it accounts for a minuscule amount of deaths annually and is a subset of a rifle, the state wants to ban it thus giving them a reason to ban all semi-automatic firearms over a long period of time.

It is a desired goal of these internationalists. Look at what the Prime Minister in Australia said during the Port Arthur shooting. He stated it wasn’t his doing but “he had to”… “because they are telling him to.” Meaning some entity or person above the prime minister of Aus Australia is calling for the disarmament of civilians. Take a look at that shooting, see if the narrative makes any sense? I’d suggest you read and watch:

https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=b1JQ1uvYuMY

https://www.change.org/p/the-hon-will-hodgman-mp-martin-bryant-deserves-a-lawful-coronial-inquest-and-for-all-our-sakes

https://cairnsnews.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/advanced-obituary-martin-bryant.pdf

Good documentary about the Port Arthur Shooting and an even better book, it’s around 800pages but exposes what the Port Arthur Shooting was really all about:

https://www.amazon.com/Murder-Keith-Allan-Noble-2013-07-19/dp/B01FEM6V10 /ref=sr_1_2?qid=1552691607&refinements=p_27%3AKeith+Allan+Noble&s=books&sr=1-2 https://www.bookdepository.com/Mass-Murder-Keith-Allan-Noble/9783000028410

The state has always feared the people. We outnumber them and have millions of firearms in circulation. This quells certain aspects of tyranny. Look at the Taliban and certain Sunni terrorist factions in the middle east, look at the war in Vietnam, were we able to defeat them with all the hi-tech weapons we had? The ideology that we stand no match to the government so we should give up our guns is sort of ignorant in my opinion. I know you’re not specifically saying this but many do.

Are you saying the government and/or military are attempting a coup? Of the nation they already control? That makes no sense. What is the end game?

The military is full of civilians with the higher ups having Zionist and war hawk like tendencies. That doesn’t mean the entire military will attack their own people, though many of them will. I’d imagine sub-factions of the military would make militias and side with the people if total tyranny arrived.

The end goal is the collapse of the US hegemony and cnetral bank system, the capture of all assets and property after said collapse, the implementation of an invisible surveillance state as exposed via wikileaks and snowdon. Whatever the end goal may be, it will be multilateral. With Israel, China and Russia taking the lead. The IMF and bank of International Settlement knows this and writes articles about this daily. The economic world order will not be from teh western front. They are simply, waiting on populism and nationalism to rise to a state where when the economies collapse the blame will be put on them. My opinion of course.