you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]four 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Where's your proof?

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Check out the discussions we've been having all day here: https://saidit.net/s/WorldNews/comments/fvl/49_killed_in_mass_shooting_at_two_mosques_in/

https://saidit.net/s/Death/comments/fyo/christchurch_mosque_footage/

https://saidit.net/s/WorldNews/comments/fxl/nz_prime_minister_jacinda_ardern_said_following/

A lot of people make very interesting and logical points that it may be a false flag. But pretty much everyone agrees it was not a hoax and that those people actually died.

[–]four 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And none have evidence.

[–]fred_red_beans 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He said he think's it's likely a false flag. It would be impossible to form a hypothesis if direct evidence was to be expected before doing so. Absesece of proof is not proof of absence.