It's a pity that you think so much of yourself, yet can't grasp the reality of the subject. Did you really share this to promote yourself out of egotism, or for someone to learn something out of charity? (It's rhetorical...)

1. Alchemy comes from ancient Egypt. Egypt is not the original name of the land, it is the Greek name - Egypt, since Greeks had to travel from the Aegean sea to the land of Pta (their chief deity). The actual name was Al Kemet, meaning the Black Land (the land around the river Nile was famous for its fruitfulness, also it was black). Therefore, Alchemy would translate to the Black Arts or Dark Arts.

2. Alchemy is not transmuting metal into gold, that's the tale they give the ignorant about the Black Arts. It's actually a spiritual technique to contact demons. You can easily spot it from their drawings (they used drawings to conceal the true meaning, that's why alchemy is almost exclusively written in alchemical symbols). The main ones that you would find are 1) the kabbalistic tree a.k.a. tree of knowledge, 2) the unification of male and female a.k.a. the sexual union between the magician and the spirit, 3) the zodiac constellations. Read your books and find the philosopher's stone - the tool used to extend the life force. You might've heard of it from the satanic "Harry Potter" books. It's not actually a stone, it's blood. And not just any blood - adrenochrome. But that's not for the simple ones to figure it out. They always conceal their knowledge, it is never to be taken literally, because they fear when someone learns the truth about the Black Arts.

Also, while being on the "Harry Potter" subject... Do you know the first magician that Harry sees in the chocolate frog's card? Cornelius Agrippa. There is an actual magician that the satanic writer wants you to investigate - Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa. This magician wrote the Three Books of Occult Philosophy - a reading that is a must for everyone reading on occult magic and alchemy, and my guess is that you haven't. Anyway, he was popularized by Goette in his work "Faust". You can find that obvious when you see that Agrippa also had a dog that jumped into the river and drowned itself upon Agrippa's death, or the fact that their loved one was called Margaretta in both cases, or the fact that Agrippa renounced his works with magic at old age, therefore, hopefully... escaping the devil's grasp. Some people believe there was an actual magician named Faust, but that's clearly false, since nobody was called by a single name at that time. Even Simon the magus, was known as "Simon the magus", not just Simon.

"But of magic I wrote whilst I was very young three large books, which I called Of Occult Philosophy, in which what was then through the curiosity of my youth erroneous, I now being more advised, am willing to have retracted, by this recantation; I formerly spent much time and costs in these vanities. At last I grew so wise as to be able to dissuade others from this destruction. For whosoever do not in the truth, nor in the power of God, but in the deceits of devils, according to the operation of wicked spirits presume to divine and prophesy, and practising through magical vanities, exorcisms, incantations and other demoniacal works and deceits of idolatry, boasting of delusions, and phantasms, presently ceasing, brag that they can do miracles, I say all these shall with Jannes, and Jambres, and Simon Magus, be destinated to the torments of eternal fire." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Cornelius_Agrippa

1. Personally, I hate people, who come with their arrogance to post. When posting, ask yourself this: Are you doing it to prove yourself, or to help others? Because if you wanted to help others, you would seek a discussion, not a verification of your misguided information...

I hope you find the usefulness in this comment, even though I also write it arrogantly, because... you will eventually find out... that when you use your Ego to present your works, there is always a bigger fish in the sea.

Using your ego is clearly stating that you're against any other opinion that doesn't match your own. While charity seeks the unity of opinions born out of fruitful discussions. Here are some examples:

• "that further confirms my past posts on the subject" - (If it really did, you wouldn't have to write that part)

• "Alchemy was coopted along the way by those that could think abstractly but lacked enough knowledge of nature's workings, matter, and biology to understand it." - (demonstratively wrong as the Three Books on Occult Philosophy show)

• "makes your possibilities limitless" - (Agrippa renounced his works... Limitless? If that were truly the case, you would've given your personal example of that...)

• "The way I lean on alchemy can be found openly explained in several of old posts" - (Point out to them, make the reader understand... Or just cryptically point to something that you might've done... probably... or haven't really... or is it just you, who think that you did them...)

---

I saw your other posts, there is use for them... but not when you work out of your own Ego. Do not chase the fame of being smart in a conspiracy forum, we will be hated no matter what we do. And the smarter we get, and more famous, the more hate we will get for our work. Be content with that, and remember that once you were lacking knowledge, and someone helped you with a post, video, comment, picture, etc. Someone, who didn't have their own Ego in mind...

Do you think that my comment was meant to bash you, or to help you? If you need help figuring that one out, just review how much work you put in your post, and how much work I put in my comment. Who is really trying to make the reader understand?