all 35 comments

[–]JoeyJoeJoe 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Confuses bacteria with viruses in the opening 30 seconds. Goes downhill from there. As credible as any flat earth video. Your credibility has been forever tarnished for posting this.

[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No it doesn't. You watched 30 seconds of a 2 hour video and immediately decided to post lies and slander. As credible as any phone addict is. Your credibility has never been established, and I view you as a lesser man for posting this reply.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

a) I'm never watching a bitchute or youtube sumission ever, put your thoughts in text or be disregarded b) there will never be an end of germ theory because it has been experimentally demonstrated repeatedly c) LOL rekt

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Germ theory predates viruses.

Bacteria are real, but misunderstood.

Viruses are fake, and never observed outside the body.

The originator of germ theory recanted. It has to many obvious holes in it.

Germ theory is a useful tool of control, as it's predicated on an invisible bogeyman that only medicine can save us from.

There isn't much money in promoting health, and healthy lifestyles. It also undermines centralized control structures.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

k

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Viruses are fake, and never observed outside the body.

For the amusement value, we should consider how wrong this is.

If you go to the nearest beach and take a teaspoon of water, you'll have in that sample something like 500,000,000 viruses, that have been observed using epifluorescence microscopy. - Viruses in the sea

The originator of germ theory recanted. It has to many obvious holes in it.

That's powerfully out there even for this site. There's a decent case that this is wronger than the previous sentence.

So when you go to hospital with an infection, and they send the sample to pathology to isolate the microbe responsible, what are they actually doing?

[–]Questionable[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

For the amusement value, you should watch the video (without skipping through it) and come back once you are done.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'm good ta, mate. Crazy that's that batshit, I can tell from the title.

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Of course you are. Because ignorance is strength.

­̭̣̬͍͉̞̝̘͉̥͚̙̤̰̭­͖͙̩͎̭̺͓̺̰

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Is "batshit crazy" superhuman strength?

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

No. But full legible sentences are apparently your kryptonite.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Antiscience quackstice league advance!

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. I get it. You are incapable of replying in proper sentence form, or portraying your thoughts in a rational manner. Should I play along? I think I shall!

Waiter! Fresh pepper for my word salad please!̪̩͑̐̅ͅ

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

For the amusement value, we should consider how wrong this is.

For amusement value? Nobody cares what your think /u/socks.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let me have a look at your comment history and see if anything you've posted is not completely wrong.

[–]DeadWalks 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Saidit is a site that promotes discussion based on submission of content, that might be text, image, video or any media that portrays an idea, a message or opinion. Nobody cares if you in particular choose not to indulge in a format of media, nor does anyone care if you disregard it on that basis, more the fool you should you misinterpret a topic based on nothing more than a submission title. For all you know it may be ironic, it may be a statement proved invalid in the video itself, or you might discover some interesting facts unrelated to the title in any way. Should you care that I don't have interest in reading your submissions from the Guardian newspaper?

You take such pride in disregarding the OP for not posting in the format of your preference and do not know the contents of the video, and yet post a vague rebuttle yourself with no substance whatsoever. You are a hypocrite who should have at least posted some resources or links that explain what is obvious to most of us, that germ theory is valid and with little that can dispute it as such.

Therefore, you aren't funny, the OP has not been "rekt" instead you look a little bit silly.

These types of videos often title themselves in an opinionated way, they aim to suggest a conclusion based on several historical facts where strange occurrences or unusual circumstances are evident, and considering that the media, government and profit hungry health organisations are rife with misconduct and coverups, over time you can easily conclude that there is an agenda toward hiding truths. This doesn't mean that those occurrences invalidate germ theory, but perhaps you would have a more intelligentual response than to try and humiliate the OP.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Nobody cares if you in particular choose not to indulge in a format of media

(writes wordswordswords to demonstrate how he doesn't care)

LOL

[–]DeadWalks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Pfft, I am not a Nobody, BISH Biatch

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You got the wrong account.

[–]DeadWalks 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Oi, not you, I got no beef with you

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sounds like you were using "BISH" as a descriptive adjective, rather than a proper noun with an alt account.

[–]DeadWalks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Indeed, my intention was a pejorative in the traditional sense, to proclaim the receiver of my retort with the disparaging slur for a woman, or a mere cowardly man. I can see how my use of emphasized capitalisation caused misunderstanding, as it was not meant to be perceived as a comparison to another user, or otherwise. Forgive my carelessness, and allow me to retract my initial use of the word Bish, in place of the word Biatch. 🤔

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

BISH is a great insult. It's hilarious.

That's why I picked. ;-)

[–]DeadWalks 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😎

[–]Youdundeeditnah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

ah yes the "viruses dont exist" psyop. i swear to god the amount of people who managed to not fall for the covid psyop only to dive balls deep into this one is just sad. I gave these people a fair shake too because they start off with a fairly obvious and non-controversial idea ie that your environment, diet and mental state have a huge influence on whether you get sick or not ... but then they take a hard left turn into utter nonsense. if you fell for this one you're dumber than a flat earther.

did it ever occur to you that it was a bit strange that this so called theory suddenly gained massive popularity shortly after the covid psyop started?? Doesn't seem just a tad suspicious that the likes of the Bailey's, Kaufman and Cowan have all been able to keep their youtube and other mainstream big tech platforms while so many others got banned and silenced??

Is it perhaps because the entire terrain theory 'movement' is a psyop to simultaneously discredit the truth movement and cause infighting amongst those who might otherwise be united against medical tyranny??

Nah, that would make too much sense. Germ theory is a centuries long scam that has been flawlessly maintained for generations. /s

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Oh my God! I sure hope you don't watch that video so that you can prove how flimsy the logic is! I sure am scared of the light!... Gosh no! Don't do that!....

You're not going to watch a single minute of that video are you?

[–]Youdundeeditnah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Like I said, I gave the so called "terrain theorist" a fair shake. I've watched this and several hours of interviews with all the top proponents of that nonsense and found them all to be utterly unconvincing. Sorry champ, you fell for an obvious psyop.

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Right. Even though Terrain theory is a concept of basic contamination, and can overlap with germ theory, you are denying it entirely.

As for your claims of having watched this video, I am unconvinced that you have done so, as you haven't mentioned or attacked a single aspect of this theory and just keep repeating trending words like "psyop" and... Nope... That's all you have said here. You have claimed it to be a psyop and nothing else.

[–]Youdundeeditnah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

could care less what you're convinced of. only an idiot would be convinced by the likes of bailey, cowan and/or kaufman. the whole point of the psyop is to get people to argue over a completely inconsequential distraction. no thanks.

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You are a filthy, filthy sock puppet.

there doesn't seem to be anything here

https://saidit.net/user/Youdundeeditnah/submitted/

[–]Youdundeeditnah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

lmao ... ooooookaaaay

[–]Questionable[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Right. A guy with no opinion, who offers up no facts, should keep his filthy whore mouth shut.