Here's a fun conspiracy, not sure what to think of it yet. The whole Canadian genocide, MK Ultra, mass graves stuff is led by a Canadian pastor, Kevin Annett. Also not sure what to think of him yet, although the testimonies of abuse and torture seem true.

Native American William Coombes testified that Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillips disappeared 10 Canadian indigenous kids in 1964

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q74ZiOt37cQ

witnessed...sisters and brothers taken, looked like little bodies under white clothes and put them into the furnace. The Queen came and visited for about 2-3 days...a lot of children went missing there

Original links to the written testimony have been taken down from the internet. Here are the archived versions:

https://web.archive.org/web/20190108063851/http://itccs.org/2011/02/28/star-eyewitness-who-named-queen-of-england-in-abduction-of-aboriginal-children-dies-suddenly-in-vancouver-hospital/

https://web.archive.org/web/20190501092503/https://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/09/05/aboriginal-residential-school-survivor-says-the-queen-of-england-abducted-children-in-canada/ (archived)

In October, 1964 when I was 12 years old, I was an inmate at the Kamloops school and we were visited by the Queen of England and Prince Phillip. I remember it was strange because they came by themselves, no big fanfare or nothing. But I recognized them and the school principal told us it was the Queen and we all got given new clothes and good food for the first time in months the day before she arrived.

The day the Queen got to the school, I was part of a group of kids that went on a picnic with her and her husband and some of the priests, down to a meadow near Dead Man’s Creek. I remember it was weird because we all had to bend down and kiss her foot, a white laced boot.

After awhile, I saw the Queen leave the picnic with ten children from the school, and those kids never returned. We never heard anything more about them and never met them again even when we were older. They were all from around there but they all vanished.

 

Coombes died an early death (death count: 8). This lady claiming to be a nurse says Coombes died under suspicious circumstances at St. Paul's hospital:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfhVnlYt5sk

However, I can't find her full name, so I can't verify if she was actually a nurse at the hospital.

 

The main point of this post is to examine the media reaction though.

Snope's fact check: https://www.snopes.com/articles/347191/queen-kamloops-abduction-rumor/

Reuter's fact check: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-missing-children-canada-idUSL1N2LM0VL

Politifact fact check: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/23/facebook-posts/queen-elizabeth-did-not-kidnap-10-children-canadia/

Daily Kos fact check: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2010/7/3/881519/-

 

There are 3 main reasons they provide for this story being false.

1) There's no evidence.

Except no evidence doesn't mean it's false, especially when zero people in power are doing any investigations. It's one guy's testimony, which may or may not be true.

 

2) Queen never visited the city, Kamloops in 1964

Fact-checkers note that the Queen visited Kamloops twice in other years (1959, 1983), but not 1964. Well, Coombes' testimony implies that she visited in secret (no fan-fare). So why would there be any documentation of her visiting the city in 1964?

Can someone as famous as the Queen really sneak away to a different city for 3 days? Well, were there daily reports of her whereabouts 365 days/year in 1964? Cause if you ask me where any of the royal family is on any given day in the age of the internet, I wouldn't be able to tell you.

Not to mention, why would the Queen ever visit some random Canadian town (Kamloops had a population size of ~10,000 in 1960) in the first place? Never mind visiting there TWICE.

 

3) Queen visited Canada in October, 1964. Coombes' testimony claims she visited the school in September, 1964. Therefore, the timing's off and she couldn't have visited the school!

Here's where the mind fuck begins. Coombes never testified that the Queen visited the school in September. Coombes' original testimony was that she visited in October

Fact-checkers changed the testimony from this:

In October 1964 when I was 12 years old...

to this:

In September 1964 when I was 12 years old...

Last time I checked, copy and paste was "ctlr+c, cltr+v"....NOT "ctlr+c, ~delete October, insert September~, cltr+v".

Yet, Reuters, one of the most well-respected media platforms is patting itself on the back for solving this mystery:

The statement alleges the incident happened in September 1964 when the Queen was not in Canada

 

Given that we know the media is controlled/manipulated by intel agencies, if Queen Elizabeth actually was innocent, why would intelligence have the media purposely lie and use logical fallacies to discredit the story?