top 100 commentsshow all 112

[–]Dragonerne 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

That's why jews hate christianity

[–]Oyveygoyim 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

No, they don't because Christians are useful for them.

https://www.ifcj.org/

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I never said you were useful.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And this is why they infiltrated and subverted it with crypto-Jews, Cabalists and Freemasons, they created a faux carciture, in order to delegitimise it and radicalise antichrists into destroying it.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I'm sure they started hating the new testament out of shame of having killed Christ because of their own superiority complex, which IMO, has gotten worse over time to the point that most Israelis are atheists nowadays which makes them total cringe in my view.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Wops killed Jesus. Romans killed him during their illegal immoral imperialist terrorist white supremacist occupation of Judea. Romans are the ancestors of Wops. Wopspeak is derived from Latin. The word “nigger” is also derived from Latin. We have Wops to blame for that, too.

[–]Mandyp 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

reported for dragging down the conversation

[–]ImNotOkay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Reported for repressed homosexuality

[–]Mandyp 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

reported for dragging down the conversation

[–]ImNotOkay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Rejected, overruled, appeal denied. Allah Akbar, Queen Hassan. May your underpants be forever uncomfortable.

[–]Mandyp 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

reported for dragging down the conversation

[–]ImNotOkay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Drink this tea ☕ trust your Muslim frens, you will wake up with no trousers and no memory.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reported for being a racist goy degenerate.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I hate to break it to you, but every other religion hates your bigoted imperialist guts, too.

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You fell for jewish propaganda

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“Jewish propaganda“ is goy projection as always. Every accusation against the Jews is a confession of what the goyim up to.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (53 children)

The Bible itself, both the old and the new testament teach a materialist nationalism and the supremacy of the male, the importance of obtaining wealth etc... this was the leading view in the Protestant nations until the masonic revolutions, in which the Jesuits had a leading role:

https://saidit.net/s/Jesuits/comments/a3d4/about_the_jesuit_role_in_the_genocide_plan_along/

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

the importance of obtaining wealth

where does it say that?

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

  • Proverbs 3:9-10: Honor the Lord with your wealth and with the best part of everything you produce. Then he will fill your barns with grain, and your vats will overflow with good wine.

  • 1 Timothy 5:8: But those who won’t care for their relatives, especially those in their own household, have denied the true faith. Such people are worse than unbelievers.

  • Luke 16:11: And if you are untrustworthy about worldly wealth, who will trust you with the true riches of heaven?

  • Proverbs 13:22: Good people leave an inheritance to their grandchildren, but the sinner’s wealth passes to the godly.

  • Proverbs 21:20: The wise have wealth and luxury, but fools spend whatever they get.

So you see, the Bible teaches a collectivism when it comes to being responsible about how you handle your wealth and use it for the good of your own people. But it also demonizes the love of money, because it can become an idol. So yeah, the Bible is kind of anti-capitalist and pro-collectivist/nationalist when it comes to how wealth should be used.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Interesting man. It sure does demonize the love of money, your quotes are a good contrast.

[–]Dragonerne 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

MONEY IS NOT WEALTH

That's the important part.

24No one can serve two masters: Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.

[–]JohnRaymond 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You are interpreting Bible yourself.. Very much in error. Out of context, you aren't meshing competing verses. Holy Mother Church is sole custodian and interpreter of bibke.

[–]Mandyp 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

reported for dragging down the conversation

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He asked a question.

[–]ImNotOkay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Baaaaah 🐑

[–]Mandyp 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

reported for dragging down the conversation

[–]ImNotOkay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Touch my wool 🐑 go on...Touch it

[–]AddledCorpse 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Where can. I find out/read more about these original teachings and how it changed?

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

https://thecatholicstate.com/what-the-catholic-church-teaches-about-the-jews-part-1/

14 parts. This is part 1.

Also the original was written in greek. Septuagint (might misspell, weird name).
And the one the jews are pushing is called the masoretic bible which most bibles today are based on. It was written much later and you have obvious changes.

[–]TheCatholicState 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Thanks for sharing! God bless!

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

How did you see that I shared it? Also the website is interesting.

[–]TheCatholicState 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I have an admin console as part of Wordpress that can show what web page linked my site. Since you linked it from this page I took a look and decided to make a profile here, since I am looking for new places to get the word out. I was permabanned from Reddit (no surprise) and get suspended from other social media sites pretty often, so this looks like a receptive audience to the stuff I write about. So thanks for bringing this place to my attention! God bless!

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That is actually a really good idea. I like your articles.

Do you know about https://christiansfortruth.com/

If you don't know about gab, then I would recommend it. It is another social media site that usually allow content like yours. The owner is also a very fanatic Christian

[–]TheCatholicState 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks.

Nice website, even though I don't agree with non-denominational Christianity, I am happy that there are other Christians doing this work!

I have a Gab. Follow me there:

https://gab.com/TheCatholicState

[–]JohnRaymond 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Catholicism and Christianity are interchangeable. Non Catholics are Not Christians

[–]JohnRaymond 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anybody banned like you... Gotta be good!

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is this site related in anyway to Judaism.is?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Hibiki, we already know you shill for Jews and Freemasons. Jesuits were Catholics until Jews took the society over.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Says the deranged Catholic.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Proud Latin mass Church goer, indeed.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

Karl Marx was raised in the Lutheran faith. Hitler was a Catholic. Christianity is the gateway drug to both communism and Nazism.

[–]TheCatholicState 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

Marx's dad was a cryptojew that only converted to Lutheranism to help his business get more shekels. Marx was a Jew through and through, and is the archetype of the stereotypical destructive self-hating Jew.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They all work for the Talmudic Jews.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

Marx was a dirty goy through and through, and Marxism takes everything wrong with Goyism and makes it worse. Its anti-capitalist propaganda is no different than anti-Semitic bigotry. Anti-capitalism is anti-Jewish.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Marx was a Jew, he is even related to the Rothschilds.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Jesus was a Jew.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jesus was not a Pharisee (modern Judaism) or Talmudic Jew; He damned them… repeatedly! He rejected the racial creed which the Orthodoxy of Judaism, the worst religion ever devised which has no redeeming qualities whatsoever, has taught secular culture Jews through victimhood complexes, the Holocaust industry and Zionism.

Recall especially that today’s “Jews” boast that they follow the Pharisees…  

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.”  -- Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474   "Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” -- Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jewish Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi   "The Talmud is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the ‘Tradition of the Elders,’ and to which He makes frequent allusions.” --Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the Talmud: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70

"Allusions”? Yes, Jesus damned those man-made traditions for voiding the commandment of God. Mark 7:8-9  

“This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible.” -- Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159   …and that Jesus singled out the followers of the Pharisees as twofold children of Hell more than the Pharisees themselves.   Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves. Matthew 23:15   The word “Jew” is a modern word with many ambiguous meanings, but neither by race, residence, nor religion was Jesus Christ a “Jew” and He certainly isn’t a bastard of a whore boiling in feces as Jews insist.   In his book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed drills that point home most eloquently:   What manner of man was this? Another paradox in the story of Zion is that in our generation Christian divines and theologians often insist that “Jesus was a Jew”, whereas the Judaist elders refuse to allow this (those Zionist rabbis who occasionally tell political or “interfaith'” audiences that Jesus was a Jew are not true exceptions to this rule; they would not make the statement among Jews and seek to produce an effect among their non-Jewish listeners, for political reasons).   This public assertion, “Jesus was a Jew”, is always used in our century for political purposes. It is often employed to quell objections to the Zionist influence in international politics or to the Zionist invasion of Palestine, the suggestion being that, as Jesus was a Jew, none ought to object to anything purporting to be done in the name of Jews. The irrelevance is obvious, but mobs are moved by such phrases, and the paradoxical result, once again, is that a statement, most offensive to literal Jews, is most frequently made by non-Jewish politicians and ecclesiastics who seek Jewish favour.   The English abbreviation, “Jew” is recent and does not correspond to anything denoted by the Aramaic, Greek or Roman terms for “Judahite” or “Judean”, which were in use during the lifetime of Jesus. In fact, the English noun “Jew” cannot be defined (so that dictionaries, which are scrupulously careful about all other words, are reduced to such obvious absurdities as “A person of Hebrew race”); and the Zionist state has no legal definition of the term (which is natural, because the Torah, which is the Law, exacts pure Judahite descent, and a person of this lineage is hardly to be found in the entire world).   If the statement, “Jesus was a Jew”, has meaning therefore, it must apply to the conditions prevailing in his time. In that case it would mean one of three things, or all of them: that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah (therefore Judahite); that he was of Judean domicile (and therefore Judean); that he was religiously “a Jew” if any religion denoted by that term existed in his time.   Race, residence, religion, then.   This book is not the place to argue the question of Jesus's racial descent, and the surprising thing is that Christian divines allow themselves some of the statements which they make. The reader should form his own opinion, if he desires to have one in this question.   The genealogy of Mary is not given in the New Testament, but three passages might imply that she was of Davidic descent; St. Matthew and St. Luke trace the descent of Joseph from David and Judah, but Joseph was not the blood father of Jesus. The Judaist authorities discredit all these references to descent, holding that they were inserted to bring the narrative into line with prophecy.   As to residence, St. John states that Jesus was born at Bethlehem in Judea through the chance that his mother had to go there from Galilee to register; the Judaist authorities, again, hold that this was inserted to make the account agree with Micah's prophecy that “a ruler” would come out of Bethlehem”.   The Jewish Encylopaedia insists that Nazareth as Jesus's native town, and indeed, general agreement exists that he was a Galilean, whatever the chance of his actual birthplace. Galilee, where nearly all his life was spent, was politically entirely separate from Judea, under its own Roman tetrarch, and stood to Judea in the relationship of “a foreign country” (Graetz). Marriage between a Judean and a Galilean was forbidden and even before Jesus’s birth all Judeans living in Galilee had been forced by Simon Tharsi, one of the Maccabean princes, to migrate to Judah.   Thus, the Galileans were racially and politically distinct from the Judeans.   Was this Galilean, religiously, what might today be called “a Jew”? The Judaist authorities, of course, deny that most strenuously of all; the statement, often heard from the platform and pulpit, might cause a riot in the synagogue.   It is difficult to see what responsible public men can mean when they use the phrase. There was in the time of Jesus no “Jewish” (or even Judahite or Judaist or Judean) religion. There was Jehovahism, and there were the various sects, Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes, which disputed violently between themselves and contended, around the temple, for power over the people. They were not only sects, but also political parties, and the most powerful of them were the Pharisees with their “oral traditions” of what God had said to Moses.   If today the Zionists are “the Jews” (and this is the claim accepted by all great Western nations), then the party which in Judea in the time of Jesus corresponded to the Zionists was that of the Pharisees. Jesus brought the whole weight of his attack to bear on these Pharisees. He also rebuked the Sadducees and the scribes. but the Gospels show that he held the Pharisees to be the foes of God and man and that he used an especial, scarifying scorn towards them. The things which he singled out for attack, in them and in their creed, are the very things which today's Zionists claim to be the identifying features of Jews, Jewishness and Judaism.   Religiously, Jesus seems beyond doubt to have been the opposite and adversary of all that which would make a literal Jew today or would have made a literal Pharisee then.   None can say with certainty who or what he was, and these suggestive statements by non-Jewish politicians ring as false as the derisive and mocking lampoons about “the bastard” which circulated in the Jewish ghettoes.     *Rabbi Stephen Wise, the leading Zionist organizer in the United States during the 1910-1950 period, used this phrase for the obvious political motive, of confusing non-Jewish hearers. Speaking to such an “inter-faith” meeting at the Carnegie Hall at Christmastide 1925, he stated “Jesus was a Jew, not a Christian” (Christianity was born with the death of Jesus). For this he was excommunicated by the Orthodox Rabbis Society of the United States, but a Christian Ministers Association “hailed me as a brother”. Rabbi Wise adds the characteristic comment: “I know not which was more hurtful, the acceptance of me as a brother and welcoming me into the Christian fold, or the violent diatribe of the rabbis”.   The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, First Printing 1956, p. 59 ff.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shut up goy.

[–]TheCatholicState 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

No, he was a cryptojew lol.

Check his early life:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Marx was raised in the Lutheran Church. He was not a Jew, in spite of the lies of antisemites. He was a goy through and through.

[–]TheCatholicState 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

His father was a cryptojew, thus making Marx a cryptojew by birth.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

His father was a Lutheran and Marx was raised in the Lutheran death cult that later aided the Nazis. Christians have EARNED collective punishment for the collective crimes communism and Nazism.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Rosenberg, the philosopher behind Nazism was of Jewish ancestry. Marx was a Jew. They're crypto-Jews pretending to be Christians.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The more you talk about Jews, the more you make me think that you are a Jew pretending to be an antisemite just to make Goyim look bad. It’s working. Keep it up and at this rate Bibi Netanyahu will be king of the world.

[–]JohnRaymond 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Pope Pius XI had encyclical against Nazism

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nazism is the naturalist opposed racialism of Jewish racialism.

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You are right about christianity being a gateway drug to communism in the sense that communism has been designed to be a jewyfication of christianity applied to politics, while nazism is basically christianity made political (german version)

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Christianity is a “Jewyfication” of Christianity because Jesus was Jewish. Might as well cut out the middleman and be Jewish. You will burn for all eternity in Hell if you don’t.

When Jews start practicing Judaism the same way Muslims practice Islam, you’re going to be among the first ones to be held accountable.

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Christianity came before judaism

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, it did not. Judaism existed for centuries before Jesus was born. In fact, Jesus was never born. He was a myth made up by the Romans to manufacture consent for their illegal immoral imperialist terrorist white supremacist occupation of Judea.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Jesus was not a Jew.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, he was, he was. Oh yes, he was.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jesus was not a Pharisee (modern Judaism) or Talmudic Jew; He damned them… repeatedly! He rejected the racial creed which the Orthodoxy of Judaism, the worst religion ever devised which has no redeeming qualities whatsoever, has taught secular culture Jews through victimhood complexes, the Holocaust industry and Zionism.

Recall especially that today’s “Jews” boast that they follow the Pharisees…  

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.”  -- Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474   "Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” -- Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jewish Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi   "The Talmud is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the ‘Tradition of the Elders,’ and to which He makes frequent allusions.” --Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the Talmud: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70

"Allusions”? Yes, Jesus damned those man-made traditions for voiding the commandment of God. Mark 7:8-9  

“This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible.” -- Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159   …and that Jesus singled out the followers of the Pharisees as twofold children of Hell more than the Pharisees themselves.   Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves. Matthew 23:15   The word “Jew” is a modern word with many ambiguous meanings, but neither by race, residence, nor religion was Jesus Christ a “Jew” and He certainly isn’t a bastard of a whore boiling in feces as Jews insist.   In his book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed drills that point home most eloquently:   What manner of man was this? Another paradox in the story of Zion is that in our generation Christian divines and theologians often insist that “Jesus was a Jew”, whereas the Judaist elders refuse to allow this (those Zionist rabbis who occasionally tell political or “interfaith'” audiences that Jesus was a Jew are not true exceptions to this rule; they would not make the statement among Jews and seek to produce an effect among their non-Jewish listeners, for political reasons).   This public assertion, “Jesus was a Jew”, is always used in our century for political purposes. It is often employed to quell objections to the Zionist influence in international politics or to the Zionist invasion of Palestine, the suggestion being that, as Jesus was a Jew, none ought to object to anything purporting to be done in the name of Jews. The irrelevance is obvious, but mobs are moved by such phrases, and the paradoxical result, once again, is that a statement, most offensive to literal Jews, is most frequently made by non-Jewish politicians and ecclesiastics who seek Jewish favour.   The English abbreviation, “Jew” is recent and does not correspond to anything denoted by the Aramaic, Greek or Roman terms for “Judahite” or “Judean”, which were in use during the lifetime of Jesus. In fact, the English noun “Jew” cannot be defined (so that dictionaries, which are scrupulously careful about all other words, are reduced to such obvious absurdities as “A person of Hebrew race”); and the Zionist state has no legal definition of the term (which is natural, because the Torah, which is the Law, exacts pure Judahite descent, and a person of this lineage is hardly to be found in the entire world).   If the statement, “Jesus was a Jew”, has meaning therefore, it must apply to the conditions prevailing in his time. In that case it would mean one of three things, or all of them: that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah (therefore Judahite); that he was of Judean domicile (and therefore Judean); that he was religiously “a Jew” if any religion denoted by that term existed in his time.   Race, residence, religion, then.   This book is not the place to argue the question of Jesus's racial descent, and the surprising thing is that Christian divines allow themselves some of the statements which they make. The reader should form his own opinion, if he desires to have one in this question.   The genealogy of Mary is not given in the New Testament, but three passages might imply that she was of Davidic descent; St. Matthew and St. Luke trace the descent of Joseph from David and Judah, but Joseph was not the blood father of Jesus. The Judaist authorities discredit all these references to descent, holding that they were inserted to bring the narrative into line with prophecy.   As to residence, St. John states that Jesus was born at Bethlehem in Judea through the chance that his mother had to go there from Galilee to register; the Judaist authorities, again, hold that this was inserted to make the account agree with Micah's prophecy that “a ruler” would come out of Bethlehem”.   The Jewish Encylopaedia insists that Nazareth as Jesus's native town, and indeed, general agreement exists that he was a Galilean, whatever the chance of his actual birthplace. Galilee, where nearly all his life was spent, was politically entirely separate from Judea, under its own Roman tetrarch, and stood to Judea in the relationship of “a foreign country” (Graetz). Marriage between a Judean and a Galilean was forbidden and even before Jesus’s birth all Judeans living in Galilee had been forced by Simon Tharsi, one of the Maccabean princes, to migrate to Judah.   Thus, the Galileans were racially and politically distinct from the Judeans.   Was this Galilean, religiously, what might today be called “a Jew”? The Judaist authorities, of course, deny that most strenuously of all; the statement, often heard from the platform and pulpit, might cause a riot in the synagogue.   It is difficult to see what responsible public men can mean when they use the phrase. There was in the time of Jesus no “Jewish” (or even Judahite or Judaist or Judean) religion. There was Jehovahism, and there were the various sects, Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes, which disputed violently between themselves and contended, around the temple, for power over the people. They were not only sects, but also political parties, and the most powerful of them were the Pharisees with their “oral traditions” of what God had said to Moses.   If today the Zionists are “the Jews” (and this is the claim accepted by all great Western nations), then the party which in Judea in the time of Jesus corresponded to the Zionists was that of the Pharisees. Jesus brought the whole weight of his attack to bear on these Pharisees. He also rebuked the Sadducees and the scribes. but the Gospels show that he held the Pharisees to be the foes of God and man and that he used an especial, scarifying scorn towards them. The things which he singled out for attack, in them and in their creed, are the very things which today's Zionists claim to be the identifying features of Jews, Jewishness and Judaism.   Religiously, Jesus seems beyond doubt to have been the opposite and adversary of all that which would make a literal Jew today or would have made a literal Pharisee then.   None can say with certainty who or what he was, and these suggestive statements by non-Jewish politicians ring as false as the derisive and mocking lampoons about “the bastard” which circulated in the Jewish ghettoes.     *Rabbi Stephen Wise, the leading Zionist organizer in the United States during the 1910-1950 period, used this phrase for the obvious political motive, of confusing non-Jewish hearers. Speaking to such an “inter-faith” meeting at the Carnegie Hall at Christmastide 1925, he stated “Jesus was a Jew, not a Christian” (Christianity was born with the death of Jesus). For this he was excommunicated by the Orthodox Rabbis Society of the United States, but a Christian Ministers Association “hailed me as a brother”. Rabbi Wise adds the characteristic comment: “I know not which was more hurtful, the acceptance of me as a brother and welcoming me into the Christian fold, or the violent diatribe of the rabbis”.   The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, First Printing 1956, p. 59 ff.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shut up goy.

[–]Rastafoo 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

You're saying the jews found a middle eastern caravan robber and wrote the Quran for him? And did everything else for him? I don't think they had that kind power back in 600AD bro

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're saying the jews found a middle eastern caravan robber and wrote the Quran for him?

Yeah you are right, they have the same stories about jewish people completely by coincidence and has nothing to with the fact that judaism is an older abrahamic faith. Mohammad just happened to come up with all the same stories, and the people even had the same (jewish) names, amazing

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Read this http://prophetofdoom.net/

You'll learn the christians refused to have anything to do with him but the local jews were willing to sell him their stories, which he bastardized a bit and made his own backstory.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's baiting people on his way to eternal torments, like mohammed did but with fewer actual coins changing hands.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Christians and Muslims stole the Torah and used that distorted version to manufacture consent for one war crime after another for the last two millennia.

[–]Rastafoo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

That's hilarious, because Islam is largely inspired by gnostic texts (not jewish) and Christians did not have military power of any kind for hundreds and hundreds of years; even Constantine didn't really stand with them which is why he made Christmas the same day as the pagan sun god, because Christians were just another religious group in the kingdom.

You make me laugh

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All non-Jewish religion is terrorism. All of it.

[–]JohnRaymond 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Could you tell me, how do I give myself more upvotes? And, you know after Great a apostasy nicer news are getting converted to Catholic fsith. our Lady of FATIMA.. Well, that should tell Muslims all they nerd to know.

THE REIGN OF CHRIST, TRIUMPH OF IMMACULATE HEART!!!!

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Eat shit.

[–]JohnRaymond 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Only problem. Christianity, which is interchangeable with Catholicism, has prophecies about Christ and Mary. Public miracles of Christ including Resurrection. And prophecies by Christ. Prophecies have been fulfilled. A few to go. Catholic Church has fulfilled many of Christ's promises . some still to come And then private revelations through out centuries by Jesus and Mary.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

I was having a bit of a troll here. It was meant to be satirical, but sound like a serious Jew conspiracy of the type that Saidit likes, using the same kind of reasoning to draw a conclusion I didn't think they would like, hoping to get some reactions, which seems to have succeeded somewhat judging by the volume of comments.

[–]JohnRaymond 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Vg. Actually, I'm gonna get you a link nxt couple days. I am on fringe of what you prob would call extreme nuts Catholics.

Anyway Jews are alleged to set up Islam and protestantism I haven't examined closely enough, but I kinda believe it .l they set up Vatican II church, headed by Francis... They have all our property And our name.

But! What they've done! Taken weak, stupid, cowardly and left a MEAN BASTARDS in ferocious Church Militant. And when we get pope, lights out for NWO!

Here's link https://archive.org/details/the-plot-against-the-church-maurice-pinay

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks for the link, I'm interested to see more about the real power relationships of these groups, I'll give it read

[–]JohnRaymond 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

2500 Bishops walked into Vatican II an failed to heed it. They handed over their church and souls to satan. Bitches

[–]JohnRaymond 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Beautiful book! I have the original hardcover.

[–]JohnRaymond 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The probable author wss brave Mexican priest. Brave, smart , holy. STOOD BY HOLY MOTHER CHURCH!

[–]JohnRaymond 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Btw, HongKong, I put post on saidit main group, about Mandy (edward?) Who reported me 10 times

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah Mandy is Edward. He has been banned countless times, but between making new accounts and Tor, there really isn't anything anyone can do about him other than block his accounts as he creates them

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm a Catholic mod, I won't let that happen.

[–]JohnRaymond 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Darn, I've been kicked off so many groups, sometimes for nsda. Sometimes I deserved it. 7th day Adventists protected me once because I was humiliating prodfies, Vatican 2 herrtics, unorthodox!

Sweet ✌

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–]Drcolossus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Turn the other cheek while we fuck you in the ass dipshits. The meek shall inherit the earth and while you are waiting for that the tyrants will run the show. Keep worshiping the dying god while those who truly seek power take it and seize control.

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All authority is from God.
Those "tyrants" you talk about cannot hold any authority in a christian nation, unless they themselves are christian, because all authority comes from God and all authority must follow the law (Gods law)

[–]LynchTheGroomers 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Letting other people make laws over you is slavery. You're a stupid animal.

[–]Hoomsns 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Which country do you live in where other people don't make laws for you?

Maybe you live at the south pole with shitting penguins?

[–]Rah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Mohamed united his teachings with jewish tenets to have enough money to fund his own warlord actions, and in exchange refused to loot jewish caravans. Jesus never parleyed with the people of the Old Covenant.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Jesus was Jewish.

[–]Rah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ok raniggerbbi

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shut up, honky goy.