all 10 comments

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do not trust everything the media tells you. Psychological operations abound.

Archived page:

https://archive.ph/ODBvj

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Source of the title's claim: https://web.archive.org/web/20021109040132/https://www.wcpo.com/specials/2001/americaattacked/news_local/story14.html

Given the confusion that day I think it is very reasonable to assume the plane that landed was misidentified as flight 93, or given that the reporter already misquoted the airline in that sentence he also misquoted the flight number.

Lastly, why are there no large pieces of plane wreckage at the crash site?

One pic of the wreckage I found with a quick image search: https://www.facebook.com/crystalfiredept/photos/a.198101236907848/4524567444261184/?type=3

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was an adult the day the news media dumped this story. I do not remember ever seeing plane parts in Pennsylvania, at the Pentagon, at the World Trade Center, or at building 7. I also did a quick search, and this page shows no plane parts at the scene:

http://www.911memorial4kids.org/aaannxyz_ch06_en.html

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

package, the photo you linked to, appears to show the crash that happened in Russia, and not in Pennsylvania.

[–]Gaydolf_Titler 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You'll have to reply directly to their message, or they probably won't see it.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I guess you are trying to be helpful, but my reply to /u/package was in his single comment thread. If you click on the message link you created, my replies are there, so he can see it. I hope he admits the photo he used was for a different plane and had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks in the USA.

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why wouldn't I admit it? The tail does clearly look more like a Tu-154 than a 767

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am glad we are in agreement. Your find, with a quick search, of a mislabeled photograph demonstrates that there is inaccurate information online about major crimes. The criminals were very active on 9/11/2001, which everyone should agree on, even if not all agree on who the criminals actually were and are.

There was no tail piece left in Pennsylvania. There were no airplane parts or dead bodies found. But this does not agree with news media coverage. Isn't that strange? Can you think of any other major news media coverage that is not truthfully reported?

[–]Gaydolf_Titler 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, you're right. Sorry, somehow it appeared to me outside the thread. Must be tired.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's OK. It can be challenging lining up all the comments that are in the same thread. I hope you get some good rest and are refreshed.