Fulminant myocarditis and systemic hyperinflammation temporally associated with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in two patients. (IJoC, 2021)

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from internationaljournalofcardiology.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Two observed, and the rest we'll just guess? Is that what my smarts are supposed to be supplying? What? Should we say: probably only half of patients went to a doctor, so it's more likely four?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Like we just guess the COVID deaths? 🙄 Or do we just write "COVID" on death certificates without a test because it's easier and because muh government changed the autopsy reporting rules, because that didn't happen right?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Like we just guess the COVID deaths?

"We" don't attribute deaths to covid, its not you and I doing that - it's trained and qualified medical professionals.

You're saying that because trained and qualified medical professionals can make expert judgements about their field of expertise, then you should be allowed to read a headline containing the word "two" and be allowed to fill in any number that you wish. Do I have that right?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Corpse has running nose, COVID, tick, hospital gets more money, repeat.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Is that what you believe the trained and qualified medical professionals are doing?

Did you ever consider that you might be wrong about that?

And it sounds like a "yes" to my prior question - your incorrect assumption here is what allows you to sub in any number at will

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

There were medical professionals kicking up a fuss about it, explaining they had never before been asked to put a cause of death such as COVID as a cause before. They said it themselves, it was not normal procedure. The numbers were inflated through passive ignorance.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Okay excellent please share the evidence and we'll look at it together.

Also please confirm that you'll give equal weight to millions of medical professionals who DIDNT think covid was a scam, to the weight you give to those handful who DID think it was.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I don't think I have the energy anymore.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

That's a shame. Because if you had had the energy to wonder why you give far less credence to the millions of medical professionals don't think covid was a scam, you might realised something about how you consume information online

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Meet them, talk to them, they were fed up of all the nonsense. There is more truth than just what you read online.