all 7 comments

[–]StillLessons 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

A two-week period is a small enough amount of time that extrapolating a pattern from it is vulnerable to the obvious counter-argument that this is just a fluke. Data is noisy, and crazy amounts of events can indeed sometimes randomly cluster in short times.

Personally, there is now plenty of data out there demonstrating serious safety signal issues from these shots (hello VAERS and insurance databases), and I think this headline is probably indicating a real effect, but extrapolating from two weeks worth of data is a weak argument.

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

True.

But...

Reminder to everyone else:

Now imagine how lying and weak the extrapolation is that's been backing New World Order vax poison pushers who are trying to implement global permanent medical tyranny with passport/biometric control over people. They want to dictate injecting substances into people at their word, at risk of real excommunication, leading to a one world government tyranny, all while plundering nations along the way for the double win.

NWO vax poison merchants used tiny relative rates to statistically deceive, posing tiny incremental differences between samples as if they're giant percentages (e.g. 1/1,000,000 vs. 1.5/1,000,000 == "50% boom, the sky is falling!"), tricking average retard normies with meaningless conclusions. And then they used lying sample sets in misleading periods of time to back up their lying agenda: completely and falsely portraying "covid deaths" and risks in children relative to the normal flu. They lie about everything.

They pull this same lying slight of hand in other fields such as "climate change" propaganda.

There is no age group at which vax poison "helps". It only hurts. Babies to 90 year-olds. None. It's snake oil if snake oil were deadly.

They're waging global war.

Babies, kids, adults, pregnant women, grandparents alike, however much collateral damage it takes is no concern to these people serving the NWO international bankers, so long as they maintain their ability to lie, deny, sweep it under the table, and maybe pay a few pennies out later to put a lid on it. They own all of the media and big tech to run cover for them.

They are the most powerful people.

[–]Bonn1770 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Good post. I'm glad I never took the clot shot. I had "covid" two years ago and lost my sense of taste for a couple months. I thought it was because I drink a lot of whisky lol. My sense of taste came back 100% though. Was never sick, but I'm happy to have natural antibodies and not vaccine induced AIDS. I have not had "covid" since, yet most of my vaxxed and boosted coworkers are constantly calling out sick. The shots may or may not have been engineered as a kill shot, but I'm leaning towards slack vaccine manufacturing protocols that introduced impurities that augment the vaccine's side effects. We may never know in our lifetimes.

[–]notafed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Say what you will, but I got the two "Vaccinations". I had something over the summer that left me on my butt for about 3 weeks in June. But I won't get the "boosters", even if they are omicron specific. Why? Vaccine induced t-cell exhaustion: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/science-unclear-fourth-covid-shot/.

[–]Bonn1770 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Flu season is right around the corner I'm praying for my vaxxed friends

[–]StillLessons 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As you said, we are in agreement. The promoters of these shots are and have since the beginning been telling the greatest lie (for population affected) ever told to humanity.

This is a question of strategy, not of truth. When confronting the lie they are telling, what are the most effective tools we have? If we say things that are readily dismissed, then we have hindered our own cause. Using two weeks of data to claim a scientific effect will make "middle-ground" people suspicious of the effect claimed. They will then be suspicious of anything that points out the same trends referenced by this data. Where they might have been open to the hordes of data showing the lethality and morbidity of these shots, having seen this claim, people may then say, "ah, but this is the people claiming two weeks is a sufficient data set... they don't know what they're talking about..." We can't afford to give them free reasons like this to block out the reality.

We need to change people's minds carefully. Every move counts.

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree. It has always come down to an unfair fight. It's a war between one side which wants truth vs. evil (globalists / NWO) which will lie to the greatest extremes if it helps them dominate the planet. On a related topic, this is also why retard stuff like "flat earth" is frustrating. On one hand there's something funny about "flat earthers" and I like places where their speech is protected because sometimes wrong sounding ideas have merit; but on the other hand, verifiably false things (which are also ridiculously grand) are one of the easiest psyops used by NWO/mainstream factions to discredit truthful opposition.