you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

The question of age of consent is not about whether it is good for people that age to have sex. It's a question of "If a 12 year old girl has sex with a grown man, is it her fault or was she a victim of child abuse". I think at 12 she knows what she is doing, and if she is going to sleep around at 12 she will sleep around at 18.

Also, if you make it illegal for a 12 year old girl to have sex with grown men, boys her own age can still have sex with her. How is this any better than a grown man having sex with her?

[–]RedEyedWarrior 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

12 year olds are still underdeveloped mentally and sexually. They are trying to process all these hormonal changes that they are going through. So they are vulnerable. Adults are supposed to guide them through puberty and ensure that teenagers and pre-teens don’t make stupid decisions. Not exploit their vulnerability, their short-sightedness or their ignorance. Furthermore, 12 year olds are ignorant of the consequences of sex, ignorant of the law, unprepared for parenthood and stop not ready to process sexual behaviours.

This is why we have age of consent laws in place. This is why the age of consent should be 16 at the very lowest, although I believe that 18 is a lot more sensible. I get it: teenagers are gonna fuck each other, so I support close-age exemptions of there is an age gap of less than 3 years, or less than 5 years if the younger person is at least 16 years old. But those two teenagers are at the same mental and psychological stage as each other. Whereas an adult would have a lot more maturity than a 12 year old or even a 15 year old. So yeah, these age of consent laws exist to protect teenagers from predatory adults. And this judge is a scumbag for supporting those predators.

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

No one is answering my question of why it is better for 12 year olds to have sex with each other instead of adults. If a 12 year old girl has sex with a guy her own age, it will be some early-developing thug. This is even worse than having sex with an adult. Having a stable job should be a prerequisite for a man to have sex, but people like you want only early-maturing r-selected teenage thugs to have sexual access to teenage girls.

[–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I don't want teenagers fucking other teenagers either, retard. At least if it was another 12-year-old, his parents and her parents can punish him and her. A man (or a woman) who has sex with a teenager is always fucked in the head, no matter what kind of job he has.

People have answered your question. You just don't want to internalise those answers because you're a sick cunt.

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

A man (or a woman) who has sex with a teenager is always fucked in the head, no matter what kind of job he has.

Sir Francis Bacon married and had sex with a 14 year old girl when he was in his 40s. Was he fucked in the head?

[–]RedEyedWarrior 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I dunno who that eejit is, but yes, he's fucked in the head.

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ok it sounds like you are an idolator who accepts this modern western principle of "pedophiles are bad" as an axiom, without thinking critically about why it is that it is bad. Past cultures married off teen girls to older men all the time, and this never caused any societal problems. But you likely don't care because this goes against your culture's values, and you identify with your culture too strongly to question its values. You accept your culture's values for the sake of them being your culture's values.

I dunno who that eejit is

He is the father of science as we know it.

[–]RedEyedWarrior 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Still an eejit and a sick fuck.

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why?