you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

The question of age of consent is not about whether it is good for people that age to have sex. It's a question of "If a 12 year old girl has sex with a grown man, is it her fault or was she a victim of child abuse". I think at 12 she knows what she is doing, and if she is going to sleep around at 12 she will sleep around at 18.

Also, if you make it illegal for a 12 year old girl to have sex with grown men, boys her own age can still have sex with her. How is this any better than a grown man having sex with her?

[–]iamonlyoneman 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

ok groomer. Children can't possibly concieve of all the spiritual aspects of sex, they don't even understand what pregnancy means. Children need to be protected from sex.

12 is too young for any sexual activity, and you should know better.

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

12 is too young for any sexual activity, and you should know better.

You stupid idealist, a high age of consent will do nothing to prevent 12 year olds from having sex. It will only lower the age of the people they have sex with. The question you need to answer is: Why is it better for teenagers to have sex with other teenagers instead of adults?

[–]iamonlyoneman 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Your false dichotomy is a pretty obvious cope for your pedophilia. Seek therapy.

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Do you believe a high age of consent will prevent teenagers from having sex with each other?

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Ages of consent, like all laws, are aimed at adults. Don't bring red herrings.

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Ok then just respond to my original comment. I don't care about the categories you learned in your gay high school class:

You stupid idealist, a high age of consent will do nothing to prevent 12 year olds from having sex. It will only lower the age of the people they have sex with. The question you need to answer is: Why is it better for teenagers to have sex with other teenagers instead of adults?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I answered it but you didn't like my answer; possibly because it doesn't make it moral for you to fuck with children

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Please link to your answer.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's immediately below your question on the comment chain, not that I'd expect you'd be able to recognize it if you missed it the first time

[–]gloomy_bear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

aoc is too low as it is. It justifies ephebephiles having sex with 16-19 yos.

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even if this were a bad thing, most 16-19 year olds don't want to have sex with older men anyway, so it is a non-issue.

[–]HeyBobby 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Get a life you pedo

[–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are a sick fuck.