They don't present evidence of it, though. Kind of a trash publication to be honest.

1. Their evidence that Cadwalladr is a CIA asset is this tweet. https://nitter.net/kennardmatt/status/1536294883933278208

The evidence in that tweet is....a publicly published article in the Observer in which Cadwalladr quotes an unnamed American source. That's literally 100% of the evidence "Mint" give for their claim.

1. Their evidence that Mason is a Mi5 asset is this screenshot of an email. https://i0.wp.com/thegrayzone.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2.jpg?w=802&ssl=1

They claim that the email recipient is Mi5 and, by the transitive property, so is Paul Mason. That's not strong evidence - besides, does that look to you like the kind of mail an asset sends to their handler? It certainly doesn't to me. That screenshot is literally 100% of the evidence provided re Mason.

So that's why I call this site trashy. In addition, they're shilling for a dictator who's currently engaged in a genocide, which is also a trashy position, so they're double shitheads Imo