US restricts use of Johnson & Johnson Covid vaccine over rare blood clot risk. (The Guardian 2022)

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from (theguardian.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CreditKnifeMan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The J&J version wasn't a mRNA injection, so it wasn't as useful to the bankers.

The courts have ruled recently that there is a legal property right to a GMO life form (vaccinated).

Modifying a person increases the legitimacy of a property right claim of an asset.
The mass vaccination is a diabolical method of perfecting the collateral.

Reality as it is.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The claim that the vaccine somehow makes you property is retarded on it's face. That is not how anything works.

However, I do find it interesting how J+J was clearly not in the same club as Pfizer and Moderna. The latter were protected from any criticism at all costs. It almost seems as if they weren't participating in the same depopulation program. It almost makes you trust them. Which then makes me think that that is the point.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The claim that the vaccine somehow makes you property is retarded on it's face.

It's not a vaccine. It's gene therapy.

ModeRNA and Pfizer versions are infact gene therapies.

The claim that the vaccine somehow makes you property is retarded on it's face.

Monsanto owns a property right to the "accidentally" cross-pollinated GMO crops of neighboring organic farmers.

The legal precedent had been set for about a decade.

GMO humans may/will be classified as a separate legal status from intact humans.

It's inherently evil.

Can you think of a legitimate reason that the oligarchs who believe they own us aren't planning this? They are.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not a vaccine. It's gene therapy.

This changes nothing.

Monsanto owns a property right to the "accidentally" cross-pollinated GMO crops of neighboring organic farmers.

Completely out of context claim that is essentially a lie.

Monsanto owns the rights to it's gene sequence even after it transfered to another crop.

GMO humans may/will be classified as a separate legal status from intact humans.

No they won't. This is a completely baseless claim. That is not how any of this works. At best people who had thier genes modified will have the ability to sue for negligent harm.

What you are claiming is akin to someone tattooing thier logo on you against your will and then getting ownership of you. That's pretty nuts isn't it?