you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

A hundred eye witnesses said it sounded just like a controlled demolition - boom boom boom, as at fell.
A dozen angles of video show a freefall collapse.
The NIST model stops running as soon as the collapse begins, and then they assume what comes next.
If the NIST conclusion of thermal expansion is correct, there would be entire semesters of engineering curriculum dedicated to studying this failure mode so it doesn't happen again.
Barry Seale said explosions followed him out of the building as he and a colleague tried to escape. They worked in the building. You must be tired from reading for a whole hour.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Multiple search engines give me one barry seale: a drug smuggler

Thermal expansion of steel is very well known already and the international building codes went through dozens of changes to reflect the NIST findings. A novel application and a novel failure don't make a novel branch of science!

The timing of the "freefall" is not actually a freefall LOL

People also heard explosions as the twin towers came down, which also didn't happen. There's video of the fall and it doesn't have explosion audio. You know what people may have mistaken for explosions before the free-fall collapse? Destruction of the building during the cascading not-actually-freefall collapse. Bystanders are not as reliable as video (which we have) and experts (who say unanimously there were no explosions).

You (all troofers actually) are grasping at straws and bad science. Do better.

[–]jagworms 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

My bad, it was Barry Jennings.

It's pretty gullible of you to believe that WTC 7 was built like a house of cards and could essentially liquidate itself through its own core because one beam fell off of it's column seat.

"The final report was issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on October 26, 2005. That report lists 13 NIST investigators, 78 contributors to the investigation, and 5 NIST “experts and consultants.” That’s a total of 96 people versus the 3,486 architects and engineers who say the federal government’s report is unreliable and must be re-opened." https://wallstreetonparade.com/2021/09/the-federal-investigation-of-9-11-ignored-recorded-eyewitness-accounts-of-firefighters-who-heard-explosions-just-before-the-towers-collapsed/

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Today I watched a video with sound. There were no explosions. You people are genuinely pitiful. Find something meaningful to care about in your life. Fall in love with the Jesus instead of nonsense conspiracy whackiness.

[–]jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jesus told me to stay away from liars and people who repeat those lies. Defense of the fake-ass official story of 9/11 is defense of the wars that followed, and misery that came with it. The attack was a false-flag op meant to get us into war, and the correct response would be to wage war on Washington DC for killing 3000 Americans.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Beleive whatever you need to in order to preserve your twisted worldview bby

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yea, all those who reported the explosion and fire in the basement have been suicided. The denial is strong in you.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

denial is strong in you

Right back atcha babe. Notsorry for looking at reality with an unaltered eye