you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

"Jews" didn't do 9/11, Zionists did. Do not confuse the two as your title does. This isn't voat.

[–]OldManCorley 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Could you please elaborate on what measures saidit will take against users who continue to post "wrong" stuff?

I'm a believer in a UFO cover up theory, but from what I've seen from your reply to a conspiracy survey on the site - you don't share my view.

If I were to post things that counterargues one of your beliefs by its existence, what would happen? Or is it just select topics we're not allowed to argue for or against?

Could you make some sort of public rules, because right now I'm seeing the main admin, from a position halfway down the pyramid of debate, by using guilt by association and "abusing" quotation marks is using the power of position to caution someone who steps out of line from the accepted narrative...

I'm positive I'm misunderstanding your intentions because this is very far from how the site has been presented and that's why I'm asking you to clarify. 👍

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Must see 2013 documentary : "Mirage Men" https://saidit.net/s/space/comments/96o/documentary_mirage_men_superbly_illustrates_how/

I'm pretty sure contrasting views are embraced here. There are alt-right and SJW posts on occasion. Sometimes folks post them because they believe them, sometimes they post them because they want to share what others believe. If we can understand many views we can better determine whether individually we agree, or better how to counter them.

Could you make some sort of public rules, because right now I'm seeing the main admin, from a position halfway down the pyramid of debate, by using guilt by association and "abusing" quotation marks is using the power of position to caution someone who steps out of line from the accepted narrative...

I don't understand this paragraph at all.

You have three choices: 1) Play it safe. 2) Do your thing. 3) Push it until it breaks.

I recommend #2. I was doing #2 (punny?) when I unintentionally did a #3. I've never done Reddit and am new to SaidIt, but ignorance is no excuse and looking back I'm embarrassed by my learning experience. I regret it but maybe you can learn from it too. It started with what I learned is called a "shit post" and all the details are self evident: https://saidit.net/s/quotes/comments/8kd/einstein_quote_if_its_smaller_than_my_fist_or_an/

[–]OldManCorley 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

  1. What is that link? How is it related to anything we're talking about here, or are you just a spammer?

  2. Are you speaking on behalf of magnora7 or saidit in any way?

I don't understand this paragraph at all.

That's fairly obvious.

I regret it but maybe you can learn from it too.

I'm not talking about myself. But it's good that you've learned some of the unwritten rules, imagine they were written down so others wouldn't have to learn the hard way...

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I speak only for myself.

Read the link. It speaks for itself. You said you were keen on UFOs.

If you're not talking about yourself why is it such big deal what the "limits" are?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If a user continues to violate the content policy after being warned then they will be banned. As you can see in this post, magnora7 didn't even issue a warning, so it's not about legalistic rules but about intention (to drag readers to the lower pyramid levels, e.g. just posting ad hominems). A goal of SaidIt is to not turn into Voat and to be a third way.